Any reason not to use 686 v.s. 386 kernel? - (inthane-chan) - (6) - April 4, 2006, 01:42:35 PM EDT
         Clearly, there is a reason that the 686 version exists. - (folkert) - (2) - April 4, 2006, 02:01:49 PM EDT
             Done, thanks. - (inthane-chan) - April 4, 2006, 02:08:31 PM EDT
             Low-power VIA stuff might need 386 - (dws) - April 5, 2006, 01:12:49 AM EDT
         Yup - (broomberg) - (1) - April 5, 2006, 12:04:32 AM EDT
             :-) - (Steve Lowe) - April 5, 2006, 12:42:25 AM EDT
         You've answered your own question - (pwhysall) - April 5, 2006, 02:59:26 AM EDT