Post #405,544
10/23/15 9:54:27 AM
|

I take it, then
...that you were in a coma between 2001 and 2009, because the practical consequences of your kind of petulance remain vividly in the memories of those of us who didn't sleep through that tunnel of carnage. "I'm going to suffer economically no matter who becomes president, so I don't give a shit whether we kill x foreigners or 20x foreigners over the coming years."
It's not about you.
|
Post #405,547
10/23/15 10:24:33 AM
|

Oh, right. 2009 was so much better for foreigner (and Americans, too, because Justice said so).
|
Post #405,554
10/23/15 11:15:37 AM
|

Cherry-picking mode: ACTIVATE!
|
Post #405,555
10/23/15 11:29:55 AM
|

Form of... A BAR CHART!
Regards, -scott Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson.
|
Post #405,557
10/23/15 11:44:09 AM
|

for your next barchart
I'd like to see a depiction of the number of civilians killed by aerial bombardment conducted by German jet aircraft between 1939 and 1945, and by US jet aircraft between 2009 and 2015, which will demonstrate that Obama is the greatest war criminal in history, surpassing even the notorious A. Hitler.
If you'd care to submit a passport-suitable photograph of yourself, I'll submit it to Merriam-Webster to go alongside the definition of "disingenuous" in some future edition.
cordially,
|
Post #405,564
10/23/15 1:43:37 PM
|

Hmmm.
|
Post #405,572
10/23/15 3:22:01 PM
|

Yeah, it matters
I'm saying that the number of furriners who will die by orders of the Hillabeast is likely to be significantly smaller than the number who will die if one of the GOP contenders takes the prize. But hey, don't let a little thing like that sully your moral purity, keed.
"It is necessary now to make a choice, to choose between two admittedly regrettable, but nevertheless distinguishable, postwar environments: one where you got twenty million people killed, and the other where you got a hundred and fifty million people killed."
|
Post #405,573
10/23/15 3:33:39 PM
|

I don't think the difference on that issue is as great as you seem to think.
I'm saying that the number of furriners who will die by orders of the Hillabeast is likely to be significantly smaller than the number who will die if one of the GOP contenders takes the prize. Why do you think that? HRC's hawk credentials are well known. How did you arrive at the conclusion that more furriners will die if it's Trump and not Hillary?
|
Post #405,580
10/23/15 7:21:09 PM
|

Hillary was pushing for war with Iran? Like, say, Rubio?
|
Post #405,577
10/23/15 6:10:21 PM
|

You take it incorrectly.
I voted for Obama both times, holding my nose the second. As such, I accept my responsibility for the bullshit Obama pulled on us. I do not wish to take responsibility for another pseudo-democrat. I don't agree with everything Bernie stands for but I do not consider him evil. Therefore he is not a lesser evil. I live with disagreement daily; np. In response to your smug assertions of disaster due to my "purity", I consider the condition of our country to be the fault of those who compromise with evil, claiming it could be worse. That would include you. We aren't going to agree. I'm done.
"Religion, n. A daughter of Hope and Fear, explaining to Ignorance the nature of the Unknowable." ~ AMBROSE BIERCE (1842-1914)
|
Post #405,578
10/23/15 6:21:33 PM
|

Give my regards to the Lollipop Guild.
|