IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New for your next barchart
I'd like to see a depiction of the number of civilians killed by aerial bombardment conducted by German jet aircraft between 1939 and 1945, and by US jet aircraft between 2009 and 2015, which will demonstrate that Obama is the greatest war criminal in history, surpassing even the notorious A. Hitler.

If you'd care to submit a passport-suitable photograph of yourself, I'll submit it to Merriam-Webster to go alongside the definition of "disingenuous" in some future edition.

cordially,
New Hmmm.
Time spans differing by 8 years is the same as time spans differing by 70. Yep, that sounds fair to me. Er, no, wait. You're showing me what disingenuous means, right?

Are you saying that assassinations by drone did not increase with Obama? That the first and only Americans murdered with that technology did not occur during his presidency and at his direction? Not to mention the Americans we kill with those things by accident (https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2015/04/23/the-u-s-keeps-killing-americans-in-drone-strikes-mostly-by-accident/) Or is it that none of this matters because REPUBLICANS!?
New Yeah, it matters
I'm saying that the number of furriners who will die by orders of the Hillabeast is likely to be significantly smaller than the number who will die if one of the GOP contenders takes the prize. But hey, don't let a little thing like that sully your moral purity, keed.

"It is necessary now to make a choice, to choose between two admittedly regrettable, but nevertheless distinguishable, postwar environments: one where you got twenty million people killed, and the other where you got a hundred and fifty million people killed."
New I don't think the difference on that issue is as great as you seem to think.
I'm saying that the number of furriners who will die by orders of the Hillabeast is likely to be significantly smaller than the number who will die if one of the GOP contenders takes the prize.


Why do you think that? HRC's hawk credentials are well known. How did you arrive at the conclusion that more furriners will die if it's Trump and not Hillary?
New Hillary was pushing for war with Iran? Like, say, Rubio?
http://www.cnn.com/2015/05/01/politics/marco-rubio-iran-war/

Or how about Trump?

http://dailycaller.com/2015/07/20/donald-trump-in-2007-we-have-to-strike-iran/

The Teabaggers can't wait to have another war. Hillary may be more hawkish than Obama, maybe, but she's not itching to get into a war the way the GOP is.

Cheers,
Scott.
     Joe says no - (gcareaga) - (48)
         Don't do that. - (mmoffitt) - (47)
             Progress is always incremental. Vote Team D. -NT - (Another Scott) - (46)
                 Disagree. - (hnick) - (45)
                     Disagree. - (Another Scott)
                     Yeah, "heighten the contradictions" - (rcareaga) - (43)
                         Going back in time is fun. - (hnick) - (42)
                             Just be sure to apply the same analysis to the other guy. - (Another Scott) - (18)
                                 You "lesser evil" guys slay me. - (mmoffitt) - (17)
                                     Re: You "lesser evil" guys slay me. - (lincoln) - (3)
                                         Frog fable. Results are the same. One just takes longer and I'm impatient. -NT - (mmoffitt) - (2)
                                             refill my bank account so I can survive your impatience -NT - (lincoln) - (1)
                                                 Well said. -NT - (Another Scott)
                                     Serious question: Who would be your preferred candidate? - (Another Scott) - (12)
                                         Huh? I know I've posted here I'm supporting Bernie. Doesn't he count? - (mmoffitt) - (11)
                                             Ok. - (Another Scott) - (10)
                                                 Re: Ok. - (rcareaga) - (2)
                                                     ;-) -NT - (Another Scott)
                                                     so you continue to support shit candidates because republicans? -NT - (boxley)
                                                 What part of "not my perfect candidate" was ambiguous? - (mmoffitt) - (6)
                                                     So you admit Bernie is the lesser evil for you? - (Another Scott) - (5)
                                                         Sure. - (mmoffitt) - (4)
                                                             Re: Sure. - (lincoln) - (3)
                                                                 How about Rubin? Can I blame him for Rubin? -NT - (mmoffitt) - (2)
                                                                     No, the clintons are democrats, cant blame them for anything -NT - (boxley) - (1)
                                                                         bullshit. Clinton gets plenty of blame for things - (lincoln)
                             nice doggie - (rcareaga) - (22)
                                 +1 -NT - (malraux)
                                 Yeah, that. -NT - (pwhysall)
                                 Yeah, not a nice world out there. - (hnick) - (17)
                                     Tell that to the Nader and Buchanan voters out there. - (Another Scott) - (5)
                                         Sheesh. Not that old refrain. - (mmoffitt) - (4)
                                             I voted for Nader in 2000. I would have voted if he hadn't been on the ballot. :-p -NT - (Another Scott) - (3)
                                                 OH! THAT'S why you gave me so much grief in 2008 for doing the same thing. - (mmoffitt) - (2)
                                                     Some of us learn from our mistakes, and want others not to make the same ones. ;-) -NT - (Another Scott) - (1)
                                                         Ha! -NT - (mmoffitt)
                                     I take it, then - (rcareaga) - (10)
                                         Oh, right. 2009 was so much better for foreigner (and Americans, too, because Justice said so). - (mmoffitt) - (7)
                                             Cherry-picking mode: ACTIVATE! -NT - (pwhysall) - (1)
                                                 Form of... A BAR CHART! -NT - (malraux)
                                             for your next barchart - (rcareaga) - (4)
                                                 Hmmm. - (mmoffitt) - (3)
                                                     Yeah, it matters - (rcareaga) - (2)
                                                         I don't think the difference on that issue is as great as you seem to think. - (mmoffitt) - (1)
                                                             Hillary was pushing for war with Iran? Like, say, Rubio? - (Another Scott)
                                         You take it incorrectly. - (hnick) - (1)
                                             Give my regards to the Lollipop Guild. -NT - (rcareaga)
                                 Of all those fantasy creatures, one is real, and she is my boss - (crazy) - (1)
                                     :-) -NT - (Another Scott)

Bestowing a cruddy-green patina to this over-polished line of deductive reasoning.
229 ms