A) The market for sand may not be so great, but fundamentalism seems to be selling quite well.
B) That spanking is only because even the colonies are more and more just shrugging at the whole sport.
![]() A) The market for sand may not be so great, but fundamentalism seems to be selling quite well.
B) That spanking is only because even the colonies are more and more just shrugging at the whole sport. --
Christian R. Conrad Same old username (as above), but now on iki.fi (Yeah, yeah, it redirects to the same old GMail... But just in case I ever want to change.) |
|
![]() notsureifserious.gif
You certainly don't have much contact with saffas, injuns, windians or convicts if you think that's the case. |
|
![]() ...who gives a fuck?
--
Christian R. Conrad Same old username (as above), but now on iki.fi (Yeah, yeah, it redirects to the same old GMail... But just in case I ever want to change.) |
|
![]() Even the jockanesians and oirish are trying to get in on it.
|
|
![]() Regards,
-scott Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson. |
|
![]() |
|
![]() I've tried to watch some matches occasionally, and I've skimmed through the rules on Wikipedia, but its very very strange.
The bowler can't/must have a bend in his arm? WTF? And there was some famous bowler who had a birth defect that made his deformity perfect to satisfy the rule or something... Yeah, this guy (or someone like him) - http://static.espncr...et-on-Murali.html The jargon is a little thick on that page, though: The most bizarre irony in world cricket is that the brilliant Sri Lankan spinner Muttiah Muralitharan is perhaps the only Test slow bowler on Planet Earth who legitimately bowls the off-spinner's wrongun, the "doosra". Does Pakistan's Saqlain or India's Harbijhan really bowl the other one? Or is their method of delivering the doosra acheieved with a flawed action? Um, what? :-) Cheers, Scott. |
|
![]() |
|
![]() The bowler must bowl the ball, not throw it.
|
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() Seems to me that the defence against the fundies (certainly for Islam) is an educated and comfortable middle-class - which is (eventually) a by-product of economic advancement.
Once you get to that point, they all convert to fundamentalist CoE, and then it's cake or death. |
|
![]() ...and fundamentalism, where is that educated and comfortable middle-class going to come from? As I understood it, they're not building one even now, while they still do have oil.
Oh, OK, you mean as *the rest of the world* goes middle class, there won't be any markets for them to export it to? Yeah, let's at least hope so... But the Middle Easterners will still have an abundant supply, should any part of the world ever run out. --
Christian R. Conrad Same old username (as above), but now on iki.fi (Yeah, yeah, it redirects to the same old GMail... But just in case I ever want to change.) |
|
![]() The middle class here (such as it is) cannot afford education. Our right wing governors are busy privatizing K-12 education and post-secondary educations (even at state universities) are becoming well out of reach of the middle class here.
Caveat: the solution here is consistent with our government's solution for everything - have college students start their death spiral of debt to Wall Street banksters even before they graduate. That's "working" for now, but I don't think it will last. |