IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Jobs Forum / I don't make large edits on these systems
Post #264,454
by jb4
Picture of jb4
8/10/06 3:47:50 PM
8/10/06 3:50:03 PM
Reply
New I don't make large edits on these systems
When I need to do real work, I use ED4W on a Windows system (the files I need to work with are generally on ClearCase servers, so access to them is just as fast on winders as on a Linux system...and the tools are much better).
jb4
"So don't pay attention to the approval ratings that say 68% of Americans disapprove of the job this man is doing. I ask you this, does that not also logically mean that 68% approve of the job he's not doing? Think about it. I haven't."
— Stephen Colbert, at the White House Correspondent's Dinner 29Apr06
Collapse Edited by jb4 Aug. 10, 2006, 03:50:03 PM EDT
I don'
jb4
"So don't pay attention to the approval ratings that say 68% of Americans disapprove of the job this man is doing. I ask you this, does that not also logically mean that 68% approve of the job he's not doing? Think about it. I haven't."
— Stephen Colbert, at the White House Correspondent's Dinner 29Apr06
Collapse All History
     I am SCREWED - (broomberg) - (71) - Aug. 9, 2006, 11:28:33 PM EDT
         :-( Get him a copy of UltraEdit. - (Another Scott) - (16) - Aug. 9, 2006, 11:44:53 PM EDT
             UltraEdit is great - (cforde) - Aug. 10, 2006, 01:40:00 AM EDT
             UE costs money. - (pwhysall) - (2) - Aug. 10, 2006, 08:11:17 AM EDT
                 OT: Shouldn't you be on your honeymoon? -NT - (Yendor) - (1) - Aug. 10, 2006, 08:40:50 AM EDT
                     he's gotta come up for air once in a while. ;-j -NT - (jbrabeck) - Aug. 11, 2006, 08:05:12 AM EDT
             That is one of the current Win choices. - (broomberg) - (11) - Aug. 10, 2006, 11:14:10 AM EDT
                 nano? - (Another Scott) - (1) - Aug. 10, 2006, 11:22:57 AM EDT
                     Install requested - (broomberg) - Aug. 10, 2006, 01:28:26 PM EDT
                 I use nano as my default editor. - (folkert) - (8) - Aug. 10, 2006, 12:29:22 PM EDT
                     Hmmm - (broomberg) - (7) - Aug. 10, 2006, 01:41:08 PM EDT
                         No "undo" - (broomberg) - (5) - Aug. 10, 2006, 02:01:34 PM EDT
                             Try this - (drewk) - (2) - Aug. 10, 2006, 02:04:09 PM EDT
                                 I've played with cream - (broomberg) - (1) - Aug. 10, 2006, 02:13:24 PM EDT
                                     I won't respond to that post - (drewk) - Aug. 10, 2006, 02:14:05 PM EDT
                             Undo is only necessary for htose who make mistaeks. - (Another Scott) - (1) - Aug. 10, 2006, 02:18:43 PM EDT
                                 You can force it to be the default - (folkert) - Aug. 10, 2006, 02:54:07 PM EDT
                         No, I use them all. I am not a programmer. - (folkert) - Aug. 10, 2006, 03:09:45 PM EDT
         Never "learned" vi, eh? I like him already! - (jb4) - (50) - Aug. 10, 2006, 09:46:17 AM EDT
             Sigh - (broomberg) - (49) - Aug. 10, 2006, 11:24:25 AM EDT
                 Well... - (jb4) - (37) - Aug. 10, 2006, 01:22:03 PM EDT
                     I think auto-complete is a macro - (drewk) - (36) - Aug. 10, 2006, 11:50:34 AM EDT
                         Depends on who you ask - (jb4) - (13) - Aug. 10, 2006, 01:23:37 PM EDT
                             So have them fix it - (broomberg) - (3) - Aug. 10, 2006, 01:42:41 PM EDT
                                 Yeah...comma...right - (jb4) - (2) - Aug. 10, 2006, 02:08:21 PM EDT
                                     Sigh - (broomberg) - (1) - Aug. 10, 2006, 02:16:44 PM EDT
                                         I don't make large edits on these systems - (jb4) - Aug. 10, 2006, 03:50:03 PM EDT
                             Is vim the windows version of vi? - (Nightowl) - (8) - Aug. 11, 2006, 02:23:29 PM EDT
                                 Nope, 'vim' is 'vi, improved' - (drewk) - (7) - Aug. 11, 2006, 02:35:10 PM EDT
                                     I seem to have both kinds - (Nightowl) - (6) - Aug. 11, 2006, 02:50:41 PM EDT
                                         If it has multiple levels of 'undo' it's probably vim -NT - (drewk) - (5) - Aug. 11, 2006, 02:55:26 PM EDT
                                             Hmmm I only know of one undo command. - (Nightowl) - (4) - Aug. 11, 2006, 03:08:10 PM EDT
                                                 What's the command you use to start it? - (jake123) - (3) - Aug. 11, 2006, 07:37:30 PM EDT
                                                     vi :) - (Nightowl) - (2) - Aug. 12, 2006, 12:08:55 PM EDT
                                                         Of course vim can be aliased to "vi"... - (jb4) - (1) - Aug. 15, 2006, 03:08:41 PM EDT
                                                             Re: Of course vim can be aliased to "vi"... - (Nightowl) - Aug. 16, 2006, 02:32:36 AM EDT
                         Yes, I mean vim - (broomberg) - (21) - Aug. 10, 2006, 01:25:05 PM EDT
                             Was I right about that being a plugin? - (drewk) - (20) - Aug. 10, 2006, 01:35:37 PM EDT
                                 No idea - (broomberg) - (19) - Aug. 10, 2006, 01:44:20 PM EDT
                                     Hmm, gvim vs vim - (drewk) - (18) - Aug. 10, 2006, 02:02:46 PM EDT
                                         I prefer gvim - (broomberg) - Aug. 10, 2006, 02:15:25 PM EDT
                                         No law says you have to use a mouse and scroolbars - (jb4) - (16) - Aug. 10, 2006, 03:53:36 PM EDT
                                             :7000<ENTER> or 7000G -NT - (broomberg) - (2) - Aug. 10, 2006, 04:59:30 PM EDT
                                                 But the day goes faster hitting Page Down 200x. ;-) -NT - (Another Scott) - Aug. 10, 2006, 05:01:30 PM EDT
                                                 Assuming, of course, that you know the target line... - (jb4) - Aug. 10, 2006, 05:07:21 PM EDT
                                             No, that's not what I was going to say - (drewk) - (11) - Aug. 10, 2006, 05:20:44 PM EDT
                                                 I've seen enough of them. - (admin) - Aug. 10, 2006, 05:22:32 PM EDT
                                                 Here - (broomberg) - (7) - Aug. 10, 2006, 06:20:39 PM EDT
                                                     And the last time you needed to edit /etc/termcap was...? -NT - (Yendor) - (6) - Aug. 10, 2006, 06:34:12 PM EDT
                                                         About 21 years ago - (broomberg) - (5) - Aug. 10, 2006, 06:49:46 PM EDT
                                                             YPB -NT - (hnick) - (1) - Aug. 10, 2006, 07:00:14 PM EDT
                                                                 Wasn't so bad. - (broomberg) - Aug. 10, 2006, 07:15:49 PM EDT
                                                             I think the term would be "pathological example" - (drewk) - Aug. 10, 2006, 05:05:33 PM EDT
                                                             Oops, time travelling on the reboot - (drewk) - Aug. 11, 2006, 10:25:23 AM EDT
                                                             No, really, that's what happened - (drewk) - Aug. 11, 2006, 10:25:48 AM EDT
                                                 10K lines? Pshaw. - (pwhysall) - (1) - Aug. 11, 2006, 03:01:08 AM EDT
                                                     Yes, I **did** know that. - (jb4) - Aug. 15, 2006, 03:10:51 PM EDT
                                             That's what incremental search is for... -NT - (admin) - Aug. 10, 2006, 05:22:12 PM EDT
                 Emacs. - (admin) - (10) - Aug. 10, 2006, 11:50:13 AM EDT
                     You can do that in vi, too - (drewk) - (9) - Aug. 10, 2006, 11:54:26 AM EDT
                         I don't see that in the man page. - (admin) - (4) - Aug. 10, 2006, 12:26:49 PM EDT
                             Nope, it's a plugin - (drewk) - (3) - Aug. 10, 2006, 12:38:20 PM EDT
                                 Looks somewhat similar - (admin) - (2) - Aug. 10, 2006, 12:44:37 PM EDT
                                     Yeah, it's not as general-purpose - (drewk) - (1) - Aug. 10, 2006, 12:55:09 PM EDT
                                         Right. - (admin) - Aug. 10, 2006, 12:57:19 PM EDT
                         nano can edit files on remote machines... - (folkert) - (3) - Aug. 10, 2006, 12:27:34 PM EDT
                             Emacs is as simple as you make it. - (admin) - (2) - Aug. 10, 2006, 12:32:21 PM EDT
                                 "Modal == teh sukc" for newbies, indeedly do. - (folkert) - (1) - Aug. 10, 2006, 12:55:19 PM EDT
                                     What bad habits would they be? (new thread) - (static) - Aug. 14, 2006, 01:10:34 AM EDT
         why cant he use the xeditor on solaris? -NT - (boxley) - (1) - Aug. 10, 2006, 02:27:08 PM EDT
             'X' - not character mode -NT - (broomberg) - Aug. 10, 2006, 05:02:43 PM EDT
         Emacs with CUA Mode? - (altmann) - Aug. 10, 2006, 06:19:38 PM EDT

If I'm trying to do something that stupid, strong typing is the least of my problems.
74 ms