IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New why cant he use the xeditor on solaris?
Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free american and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 50 years. meep
New 'X' - not character mode
     I am SCREWED - (broomberg) - (71)
         :-( Get him a copy of UltraEdit. - (Another Scott) - (16)
             UltraEdit is great - (cforde)
             UE costs money. - (pwhysall) - (2)
                 OT: Shouldn't you be on your honeymoon? -NT - (Yendor) - (1)
                     he's gotta come up for air once in a while. ;-j -NT - (jbrabeck)
             That is one of the current Win choices. - (broomberg) - (11)
                 nano? - (Another Scott) - (1)
                     Install requested - (broomberg)
                 I use nano as my default editor. - (folkert) - (8)
                     Hmmm - (broomberg) - (7)
                         No "undo" - (broomberg) - (5)
                             Try this - (drewk) - (2)
                                 I've played with cream - (broomberg) - (1)
                                     I won't respond to that post - (drewk)
                             Undo is only necessary for htose who make mistaeks. - (Another Scott) - (1)
                                 You can force it to be the default - (folkert)
                         No, I use them all. I am not a programmer. - (folkert)
         Never "learned" vi, eh? I like him already! - (jb4) - (50)
             Sigh - (broomberg) - (49)
                 Well... - (jb4) - (37)
                     I think auto-complete is a macro - (drewk) - (36)
                         Depends on who you ask - (jb4) - (13)
                             So have them fix it - (broomberg) - (3)
                                 Yeah...comma...right - (jb4) - (2)
                                     Sigh - (broomberg) - (1)
                                         I don't make large edits on these systems - (jb4)
                             Is vim the windows version of vi? - (Nightowl) - (8)
                                 Nope, 'vim' is 'vi, improved' - (drewk) - (7)
                                     I seem to have both kinds - (Nightowl) - (6)
                                         If it has multiple levels of 'undo' it's probably vim -NT - (drewk) - (5)
                                             Hmmm I only know of one undo command. - (Nightowl) - (4)
                                                 What's the command you use to start it? - (jake123) - (3)
                                                     vi :) - (Nightowl) - (2)
                                                         Of course vim can be aliased to "vi"... - (jb4) - (1)
                                                             Re: Of course vim can be aliased to "vi"... - (Nightowl)
                         Yes, I mean vim - (broomberg) - (21)
                             Was I right about that being a plugin? - (drewk) - (20)
                                 No idea - (broomberg) - (19)
                                     Hmm, gvim vs vim - (drewk) - (18)
                                         I prefer gvim - (broomberg)
                                         No law says you have to use a mouse and scroolbars - (jb4) - (16)
                                             :7000<ENTER> or 7000G -NT - (broomberg) - (2)
                                                 But the day goes faster hitting Page Down 200x. ;-) -NT - (Another Scott)
                                                 Assuming, of course, that you know the target line... - (jb4)
                                             No, that's not what I was going to say - (drewk) - (11)
                                                 I've seen enough of them. - (admin)
                                                 Here - (broomberg) - (7)
                                                     And the last time you needed to edit /etc/termcap was...? -NT - (Yendor) - (6)
                                                         About 21 years ago - (broomberg) - (5)
                                                             YPB -NT - (hnick) - (1)
                                                                 Wasn't so bad. - (broomberg)
                                                             I think the term would be "pathological example" - (drewk)
                                                             Oops, time travelling on the reboot - (drewk)
                                                             No, really, that's what happened - (drewk)
                                                 10K lines? Pshaw. - (pwhysall) - (1)
                                                     Yes, I **did** know that. - (jb4)
                                             That's what incremental search is for... -NT - (admin)
                 Emacs. - (admin) - (10)
                     You can do that in vi, too - (drewk) - (9)
                         I don't see that in the man page. - (admin) - (4)
                             Nope, it's a plugin - (drewk) - (3)
                                 Looks somewhat similar - (admin) - (2)
                                     Yeah, it's not as general-purpose - (drewk) - (1)
                                         Right. - (admin)
                         nano can edit files on remote machines... - (folkert) - (3)
                             Emacs is as simple as you make it. - (admin) - (2)
                                 "Modal == teh sukc" for newbies, indeedly do. - (folkert) - (1)
                                     What bad habits would they be? (new thread) - (static)
         why cant he use the xeditor on solaris? -NT - (boxley) - (1)
             'X' - not character mode -NT - (broomberg)
         Emacs with CUA Mode? - (altmann)

It applies to so much...
309 ms