IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New I've played with cream
It is INCREDIBLY slow.
New I won't respond to that post
Mostly because I'm afraid to read whatever is under that subject line.
===

Purveyor of Doc Hope's [link|http://DocHope.com|fresh-baked dog biscuits and pet treats].
[link|http://DocHope.com|http://DocHope.com]
     I am SCREWED - (broomberg) - (71)
         :-( Get him a copy of UltraEdit. - (Another Scott) - (16)
             UltraEdit is great - (cforde)
             UE costs money. - (pwhysall) - (2)
                 OT: Shouldn't you be on your honeymoon? -NT - (Yendor) - (1)
                     he's gotta come up for air once in a while. ;-j -NT - (jbrabeck)
             That is one of the current Win choices. - (broomberg) - (11)
                 nano? - (Another Scott) - (1)
                     Install requested - (broomberg)
                 I use nano as my default editor. - (folkert) - (8)
                     Hmmm - (broomberg) - (7)
                         No "undo" - (broomberg) - (5)
                             Try this - (drewk) - (2)
                                 I've played with cream - (broomberg) - (1)
                                     I won't respond to that post - (drewk)
                             Undo is only necessary for htose who make mistaeks. - (Another Scott) - (1)
                                 You can force it to be the default - (folkert)
                         No, I use them all. I am not a programmer. - (folkert)
         Never "learned" vi, eh? I like him already! - (jb4) - (50)
             Sigh - (broomberg) - (49)
                 Well... - (jb4) - (37)
                     I think auto-complete is a macro - (drewk) - (36)
                         Depends on who you ask - (jb4) - (13)
                             So have them fix it - (broomberg) - (3)
                                 Yeah...comma...right - (jb4) - (2)
                                     Sigh - (broomberg) - (1)
                                         I don't make large edits on these systems - (jb4)
                             Is vim the windows version of vi? - (Nightowl) - (8)
                                 Nope, 'vim' is 'vi, improved' - (drewk) - (7)
                                     I seem to have both kinds - (Nightowl) - (6)
                                         If it has multiple levels of 'undo' it's probably vim -NT - (drewk) - (5)
                                             Hmmm I only know of one undo command. - (Nightowl) - (4)
                                                 What's the command you use to start it? - (jake123) - (3)
                                                     vi :) - (Nightowl) - (2)
                                                         Of course vim can be aliased to "vi"... - (jb4) - (1)
                                                             Re: Of course vim can be aliased to "vi"... - (Nightowl)
                         Yes, I mean vim - (broomberg) - (21)
                             Was I right about that being a plugin? - (drewk) - (20)
                                 No idea - (broomberg) - (19)
                                     Hmm, gvim vs vim - (drewk) - (18)
                                         I prefer gvim - (broomberg)
                                         No law says you have to use a mouse and scroolbars - (jb4) - (16)
                                             :7000<ENTER> or 7000G -NT - (broomberg) - (2)
                                                 But the day goes faster hitting Page Down 200x. ;-) -NT - (Another Scott)
                                                 Assuming, of course, that you know the target line... - (jb4)
                                             No, that's not what I was going to say - (drewk) - (11)
                                                 I've seen enough of them. - (admin)
                                                 Here - (broomberg) - (7)
                                                     And the last time you needed to edit /etc/termcap was...? -NT - (Yendor) - (6)
                                                         About 21 years ago - (broomberg) - (5)
                                                             YPB -NT - (hnick) - (1)
                                                                 Wasn't so bad. - (broomberg)
                                                             I think the term would be "pathological example" - (drewk)
                                                             Oops, time travelling on the reboot - (drewk)
                                                             No, really, that's what happened - (drewk)
                                                 10K lines? Pshaw. - (pwhysall) - (1)
                                                     Yes, I **did** know that. - (jb4)
                                             That's what incremental search is for... -NT - (admin)
                 Emacs. - (admin) - (10)
                     You can do that in vi, too - (drewk) - (9)
                         I don't see that in the man page. - (admin) - (4)
                             Nope, it's a plugin - (drewk) - (3)
                                 Looks somewhat similar - (admin) - (2)
                                     Yeah, it's not as general-purpose - (drewk) - (1)
                                         Right. - (admin)
                         nano can edit files on remote machines... - (folkert) - (3)
                             Emacs is as simple as you make it. - (admin) - (2)
                                 "Modal == teh sukc" for newbies, indeedly do. - (folkert) - (1)
                                     What bad habits would they be? (new thread) - (static)
         why cant he use the xeditor on solaris? -NT - (boxley) - (1)
             'X' - not character mode -NT - (broomberg)
         Emacs with CUA Mode? - (altmann)

Powered by sporks.
140 ms