IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New :-( Get him a copy of UltraEdit.
[link|http://www.ultraedit.com/index.php?name=Content&pa=showpage&pid=10|UltraEdit].

He may love it. It has help for regex. He'll be in your debt... ;-)

Hang in there.

Cheers,
Scott.
(Satisfied customer, nothing more.)
New UltraEdit is great
if you want to avoid Windows, try nedit, or if Mac OS X is an option, try TextMate.
Have fun,
Carl Forde
New UE costs money.
SCiTE is free and Free. And it's *tiny* and fast and stuff.


Peter
[link|http://www.no2id.net/|Don't Let The Terrorists Win]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Home]
Use P2P for legitimate purposes!
[link|http://kevan.org/brain.cgi?pwhysall|A better terminal emulator]
New OT: Shouldn't you be on your honeymoon?
-YendorMike

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
- Benjamin Franklin, 1759 Historical Review of Pennsylvania
New he's gotta come up for air once in a while. ;-j
A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort. (Herm Albright)
New That is one of the current Win choices.
I need to come up with a Unix character mode editor that junior Perl programmers (Ex COBOL programmers) can use.

Desire perl syntax highlighting.
New nano?
In my trying to set up [link|http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=186747|MythTV on Ubuntu 6.06] a few weeks ago, I found that the default Gnome editor wouldn't let me edit files I needed to change due to some permission issue, but nano worked fine. I was able to figure it out without reading any manual, so it's probably a good choice.

It does [link|http://wiki.linuxhelp.net/index.php/Nano_Syntax_Highlighting#Perl|perl syntax highlighting too], with some configuration.

HTH.

Cheers,
Scott.
(Who had to quit for a while after fighting with getting IVTV working, step 5.2, and being unsuccessful...)
New Install requested
Already on my Linux box, asked for them to put it on the Solaris.
New I use nano as my default editor.
I don't consider it a bad editor at all.

I use emacs and vi, but only if pico or nano aren't available.

nano can help him graduate into vim, vi or emacs once he gets used to the PuTTY stuff and howto use it properly.

And that syntax highlighting Katzer pointed out can be hugely extended.

Also, on Debian and Ubuntu, /etc/nanorc has a lot of it already there just commented out.
--
[link|mailto:greg@gregfolkert.net|greg],
[link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] @ iwethey
Freedom is not FREE.
Yeah, but 10s of Trillions of US Dollars?
SELECT * FROM scog WHERE ethics > 0;

0 rows returned.
Expand Edited by folkert Aug. 10, 2006, 12:29:22 PM EDT
New Hmmm
Once a user is actively using as something as simple and easy as nano, I highly doubt they will move to another editor after that point.

Just like you won't.

No matter how productive the other editor is, the core incentive to move is not there, ie: they are accomplishing what they need to accomplish using the simple editor.

I asked to have it put on the box so this one guy can at least work directly.

But for people who are new to the environment, who claim to be programmers, who I have some responsibility for (career direction, education, management recommendations for what they should be doing in a few months) I'll give a choice.

vim or eamcs.

Choose one or the other. But if you choose emacs, I can't help you if you run into a problem.

If the response is: Nah, that's too hard, I heard so-and-so say that this editor (nano) is much easier. I'll let them. But I'll also know that they don't really care about learning to best way to do something, they care about immediate gratification. And as time goes on, I'm sure the ones that choose vim or emacs will also be the ones who learn the best and produce the best, which is a virtuous cycle.

Also, I LIKE modal. Sorry. And it's not baby chick, I've worked with many editors before I started using vi. Single character movement is the quickest, especially though laggy dial-up or network. And vi was designed to be the minimum number of keystrokes to type and transmit to do a given task.
New No "undo"
What piece of crap.
New Try this
In the [link|http://www.linux.com/article.pl?sid=05/08/24/145234|list of plugins] I mentioned in the other post, there's a link to "cream", which is a vim targeted at new users. Might be worth a look.
===

Purveyor of Doc Hope's [link|http://DocHope.com|fresh-baked dog biscuits and pet treats].
[link|http://DocHope.com|http://DocHope.com]
New I've played with cream
It is INCREDIBLY slow.
New I won't respond to that post
Mostly because I'm afraid to read whatever is under that subject line.
===

Purveyor of Doc Hope's [link|http://DocHope.com|fresh-baked dog biscuits and pet treats].
[link|http://DocHope.com|http://DocHope.com]
New Undo is only necessary for htose who make mistaeks.
I didn't know that nano had no undo. Oh well.

For safety, one could enable the [link|http://www.nano-editor.org/dist/v1.2/nano.html#SEC4|-B flag] to make backups on saves. But yeah, it's not ideal.

Cheers,
Scott.
New You can force it to be the default
in /etc/nanorc
## Backup files to filename~.\nset backup

--
[link|mailto:greg@gregfolkert.net|greg],
[link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] @ iwethey
Freedom is not FREE.
Yeah, but 10s of Trillions of US Dollars?
SELECT * FROM scog WHERE ethics > 0;

0 rows returned.
New No, I use them all. I am not a programmer.
Though when I do bulk changes etc... I use a stream editior

I could change. If I could gain 1 hour a day... I would have quite a long time ago.

If I were a programmer, I'd have a MUCH different set of feelings.
--
[link|mailto:greg@gregfolkert.net|greg],
[link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] @ iwethey
Freedom is not FREE.
Yeah, but 10s of Trillions of US Dollars?
SELECT * FROM scog WHERE ethics > 0;

0 rows returned.
     I am SCREWED - (broomberg) - (71)
         :-( Get him a copy of UltraEdit. - (Another Scott) - (16)
             UltraEdit is great - (cforde)
             UE costs money. - (pwhysall) - (2)
                 OT: Shouldn't you be on your honeymoon? -NT - (Yendor) - (1)
                     he's gotta come up for air once in a while. ;-j -NT - (jbrabeck)
             That is one of the current Win choices. - (broomberg) - (11)
                 nano? - (Another Scott) - (1)
                     Install requested - (broomberg)
                 I use nano as my default editor. - (folkert) - (8)
                     Hmmm - (broomberg) - (7)
                         No "undo" - (broomberg) - (5)
                             Try this - (drewk) - (2)
                                 I've played with cream - (broomberg) - (1)
                                     I won't respond to that post - (drewk)
                             Undo is only necessary for htose who make mistaeks. - (Another Scott) - (1)
                                 You can force it to be the default - (folkert)
                         No, I use them all. I am not a programmer. - (folkert)
         Never "learned" vi, eh? I like him already! - (jb4) - (50)
             Sigh - (broomberg) - (49)
                 Well... - (jb4) - (37)
                     I think auto-complete is a macro - (drewk) - (36)
                         Depends on who you ask - (jb4) - (13)
                             So have them fix it - (broomberg) - (3)
                                 Yeah...comma...right - (jb4) - (2)
                                     Sigh - (broomberg) - (1)
                                         I don't make large edits on these systems - (jb4)
                             Is vim the windows version of vi? - (Nightowl) - (8)
                                 Nope, 'vim' is 'vi, improved' - (drewk) - (7)
                                     I seem to have both kinds - (Nightowl) - (6)
                                         If it has multiple levels of 'undo' it's probably vim -NT - (drewk) - (5)
                                             Hmmm I only know of one undo command. - (Nightowl) - (4)
                                                 What's the command you use to start it? - (jake123) - (3)
                                                     vi :) - (Nightowl) - (2)
                                                         Of course vim can be aliased to "vi"... - (jb4) - (1)
                                                             Re: Of course vim can be aliased to "vi"... - (Nightowl)
                         Yes, I mean vim - (broomberg) - (21)
                             Was I right about that being a plugin? - (drewk) - (20)
                                 No idea - (broomberg) - (19)
                                     Hmm, gvim vs vim - (drewk) - (18)
                                         I prefer gvim - (broomberg)
                                         No law says you have to use a mouse and scroolbars - (jb4) - (16)
                                             :7000<ENTER> or 7000G -NT - (broomberg) - (2)
                                                 But the day goes faster hitting Page Down 200x. ;-) -NT - (Another Scott)
                                                 Assuming, of course, that you know the target line... - (jb4)
                                             No, that's not what I was going to say - (drewk) - (11)
                                                 I've seen enough of them. - (admin)
                                                 Here - (broomberg) - (7)
                                                     And the last time you needed to edit /etc/termcap was...? -NT - (Yendor) - (6)
                                                         About 21 years ago - (broomberg) - (5)
                                                             YPB -NT - (hnick) - (1)
                                                                 Wasn't so bad. - (broomberg)
                                                             I think the term would be "pathological example" - (drewk)
                                                             Oops, time travelling on the reboot - (drewk)
                                                             No, really, that's what happened - (drewk)
                                                 10K lines? Pshaw. - (pwhysall) - (1)
                                                     Yes, I **did** know that. - (jb4)
                                             That's what incremental search is for... -NT - (admin)
                 Emacs. - (admin) - (10)
                     You can do that in vi, too - (drewk) - (9)
                         I don't see that in the man page. - (admin) - (4)
                             Nope, it's a plugin - (drewk) - (3)
                                 Looks somewhat similar - (admin) - (2)
                                     Yeah, it's not as general-purpose - (drewk) - (1)
                                         Right. - (admin)
                         nano can edit files on remote machines... - (folkert) - (3)
                             Emacs is as simple as you make it. - (admin) - (2)
                                 "Modal == teh sukc" for newbies, indeedly do. - (folkert) - (1)
                                     What bad habits would they be? (new thread) - (static)
         why cant he use the xeditor on solaris? -NT - (boxley) - (1)
             'X' - not character mode -NT - (broomberg)
         Emacs with CUA Mode? - (altmann)

A mindset is a terrible thing to waste.
103 ms