Post #236,619
11/30/05 3:20:44 PM
|
Re: Of course I have antilock.
And I don't give a fuck about my ignition timing control, because I don't turn the ignition whilst the car is moving. Your car's computer does, constantly, just like it controls shifting in the transmission in most modern vehicles with automatics.
-- Steve [link|http://www.ubuntulinux.org|Ubuntu]
|
Post #236,623
11/30/05 3:26:01 PM
|
and early autos did have ignition control . . .
. . generally a separate lever in the center of the steering wheel. This was replaced by the centrifugal and vacuum advances built into the distributor.
This is not a problem because it responds pretty much instantaneously to current engine conditions. The probalem with automatic transmissions is that they cannot anticipate the intended actions of the driver and they're slower to respond to current conditions and often wrong.
Of course not everyone drives as aggressively as I do so many are happy with the automatic.
[link|http://www.aaxnet.com|AAx]
|
Post #236,627
11/30/05 3:32:11 PM
|
Now I understand the helmet!
A good friend will come and bail you out of jail ... but, a true friend will be sitting next to you saying, "Damn...that was fun!"
|
Post #236,629
11/30/05 3:38:31 PM
|
Yup, that was my point
Ignition timing used to be a manual process. And when they figured out a way to automate it, there were people who criticized the loss of control. And some of them were even right, for a while. Until they improved the performance of the automatic systems.
So if your issue with an automatic is that it doesn't react quickly enough -- which you, Andrew, seem to be saying -- then you may be right. Or you may think you're a better, more agressive driver than you really are. (You did say you haven't felt the need for the "performance" switch yet, right?)
But if your position is that stick is better because it demands more attention, then you should also be in favor of manually controlling the ignition timing. And the fuel richness. And the injector timing. And ... and ... and ...
===
Purveyor of Doc Hope's [link|http://DocHope.com|fresh-baked dog biscuits and pet treats]. [link|http://DocHope.com|http://DocHope.com]
|
Post #236,633
11/30/05 3:46:36 PM
|
If you want to control *anything*...
...you want to control *everything*?
Blimey.
Peter [link|http://www.no2id.net/|Don't Let The Terrorists Win] [link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal] [link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Home] Use P2P for legitimate purposes!
|
Post #236,638
11/30/05 3:50:43 PM
|
You didn't say, "This is one thing I'd like to control."
You said, "This is something that everyone, especially inattentive drivers, should be forced to control, as it will demand more attention from them." I'm just suggesting other things that would demand more attention.
===
Purveyor of Doc Hope's [link|http://DocHope.com|fresh-baked dog biscuits and pet treats]. [link|http://DocHope.com|http://DocHope.com]
|
Post #236,640
11/30/05 3:56:41 PM
|
Programmers. So damned literal all the time.
I had a situation today where I had to explain (to a developer) that saying "Bad format at line XXXX" wasn't helpful, as the format could have been wrong in at least a half-dozen different ways, and line XXXX could be anywhere in a three-million-line-long text file, and the thing causing indigestion at line XXXX could have been at line YYYY, also anywhere in a three-million-line-long text file.
And I didn't say that, anyway. I said that it demands more attention on the driving situation at hand, because it forces you to pay more attention to the speed and situation of your vehicle.
Which is NOT what you just said that I said.
So neener.
I'm so going to tip you in that damn pool next time, permissions-boi.
Peter [link|http://www.no2id.net/|Don't Let The Terrorists Win] [link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal] [link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Home] Use P2P for legitimate purposes!
|
Post #236,663
11/30/05 5:22:58 PM
|
But it doesn't
I said that it demands more attention on the driving situation at hand, because it forces you to pay more attention to the speed and situation of your vehicle. No, it demands you pay attention to the speed and situation of your engine and transmission. This is related to the speed and situation of your vehicle. The Toyota minivan I rented last weekend ran so quietly I could not have shifted without staring at the tach. I never knew what gear it was in, and frankly didn't care. There was one point when I wanted to merge and knew I'd need to drop a gear. I just floored it a half-second before I knew I'd want to speed up. So by having a grasp of my speed and situation, I was able to react appropriately. Without a stick-shift.
===
Purveyor of Doc Hope's [link|http://DocHope.com|fresh-baked dog biscuits and pet treats]. [link|http://DocHope.com|http://DocHope.com]
|
Post #236,641
11/30/05 4:00:10 PM
|
No, I'm not that much of a control freak.
My point is that an automatic transmission cannot anticipate my needs, in fact it's a second or two behind. I can anticipate my needs and see that my engine speed and gearing will be what I need them to be when I need them.
The Saturn's greater engine power combined with much better selections by the automatic transmission is a vast improvement over the Escort, but it's still sometimes messing around doing the wrong thing for a second or two and has to change its mind.
Automatic ignition timing and injection control are better than I'd want to bother to be at their job, so I'm perfectly happy to let them have those functions.
Now, for my real complaint. This Saturn is the first car I've had with an alarm system built in. Now that stupid thing is a TOTAL pain in the ass.
[link|http://www.aaxnet.com|AAx]
|
Post #236,701
12/1/05 12:08:14 AM
|
ICLRPD (new thread)
Created as new thread #236700 titled [link|/forums/render/content/show?contentid=236700|ICLRPD]
-- Steve [link|http://www.ubuntulinux.org|Ubuntu]
|