Maybe with you.

Post #227,701 by bepatient 10/3/05 9:22:26 AM Reply	Maybe with you. Not so with many. Sure, had he done everything "right" from the beginning he could have won some over. I guess I'm even more cynical about other admins versus this admin. Are tehy actually >more< crooked or just more open about it? Heard Clinton talking about imperialist economics last night wrt Africa. It was MORALLY imperative as well as self interest. Somehow, though, when he says it some folks think it sounds great...if it were to come identically from the lips of GWB (though he'd likely mangle the pronounciation of the countries) it would be considered the worst type of policy imagined. Dunno..I see it more as biz as usual. If you push something hard enough, it will fall over. _{Fudd's First Law of Opposition} [link\|mailto:bepatient@aol.com\|BePatient]
Post #227,708 by hnick 10/3/05 9:52:11 AM Reply	Re: Other admins vs this one It's hard to tell. This administration is so secretive that it's hard to know just how corrupt they really are. Other administrations did a lot of horse trading to get their agendas implemented, and admittedly some of those were fairly rotten. This administration wishes to rule, not lead. There is little negotiation, just demands and iron rule of the legislature. What is visible, the cronyism, no bid contracts, special interests, all look rotten, perhaps worse than it really is. But how to know? Most is hidden. So if you're saying that other administrations were corrupt as well, there is no arguement. If you are saying that Crusader Bunnypants should get a pass because he's not as bad as others, I would disagree. I think Bush et al. is probably the worst thing to hit this country since the Civil War. And may cause another.
Post #227,745 by tuberculosis 10/3/05 12:24:27 PM 10/3/05 12:26:25 PM Reply	Key difference I see is that this one is a system designed to subvert the intent of the constitution. Other admins actually mostly did their job while lining their own pockets. These guys don't do their jobs and don't just line their pockets, they line theirs and all their friends who often use the resources to kick the workers in the teeth. These guys have also set human rights back about 100 years by fomenting their own terrorism/torture and throwing out the geneva convention. They are war criminals and should be tried and (most likely) executed. IOW, these are FASCISTS. New animal in US History. "Whenever you find you are on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect" --Mark Twain "The significant problems we face cannot be solved at the same level of thinking we were at when we created them." --Albert Einstein "This is still a dangerous world. It's a world of madmen and uncertainty and potential mental losses." --George W. Bush Edited by tuberculosis Oct. 3, 2005, 12:26:25 PM EDT Expand All History
Post #227,747 by Simon_Jester 10/3/05 12:26:37 PM Reply	Now that I agree with... Heard Clinton talking about imperialist economics last night wrt Africa. It was MORALLY imperative as well as self interest. Somehow, though, when he says it some folks think it sounds great...if it were to come identically from the lips of GWB (though he'd likely mangle the pronounciation of the countries) it would be considered the worst type of policy imagined. The left is just as bad at this, imo. If George talked about imperialist economies with any country, the left would be in arms. Hillary gets a freakin' free pass on it.

Welcome to IWETHEY!