As usual - you want to dumb down the possibilities to some either/or as panders to the absurd idea that, increasing the power of an inept group - can somehow make up for their demonstrated overall incompetence. Brilliant, that.
Ya wants a recipe, eh? [I'll bet you do..]
Among choices are:
A) The reasonably sane (and AFAIK - extant) rules - that the Fed already Can take over *anytime* it perceives a chaotic situation and declares a National Emergency. BUT: this power is NOT a substitute for Government's duty to provide coordinated assistance, competently organized and expedititiously applied. Obv The Army et al - Must be Fed controlled - should their at-home service be needed.
(Help-service not bayonet-service.)
(B thru n) Rewrite a bunch of laws making the Fed the Official, not emergency organizer of All Things, henceforth. About as fine an idea as [FEMA + Fatherland Security] - all run by party hacks with no experience or cred.
Now, given the record of this Admin - its paranoid secrecy beyond that of any predecessors
(commencing with the silencing of Previous Presidential writings on Day 1);
its virtually sole motive for making every decision:
(that we've yet become aware of)
perceived political gain, including - every possible step to assure One-party permanence in power.
(~~ P.R.I. de Mexico) --
Given all that - methinks B thru n represent a much greater likelihood of additional threats to Constitutional law in the US than would:
simply, some clarification of A) and steps to edjakate the Managers / replace with Pros, all the remaining political hacks with patronage positions (a ploy used by cabals who don't really Want a functioning government.)
Making the C+C+C structure actually function! - would go a long way to obviating any need for further arrogation of Power to the likes of these (or any megalomaniacal successors): we are supposed to Learn from past naivete and mistakes, even if their perpetrators "never make any".
Oh, and -
I suspect that A) shall not actually work:
these people are incapable of creating and executing any viable plans - yet. Wouldn't it be foolish to expect Objectively Infallible folk to - change?
That would require Admitting Error. Zealots are incapable of such heresy.
Oh, yes too -
..hold the mayo, hold the onions - hold the Faith-based addena, in this process - Please.
edit typoo