IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Open Forum / What is this measured on?
Post #226,665
by folkert
Picture of folkert
9/27/05 10:46:17 AM
9/28/05 1:41:21 PM
Reply
New What is this measured on?
As I get some thing, I was not aware of.

It seems to be much too personal to be coincednce.

Well, I scored a: 32 underscale

But I thought I didn't put my name in, yet it had it there. So, i guess I musta.

So, I guess its not what anyone would think.
--
[link|mailto:greg@gregfolkert.net|greg],
[link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] @ iwethey
[image|http://www.danasoft.com/vipersig.jpg||||]
Expand Edited by folkert Sept. 28, 2005, 01:41:21 PM EDT
Expand All History
Post #226,673
by inthane-chan
Picture of inthane-chan
9/27/05 11:47:25 AM
Reply
New Honestly don't know.
I do know that one PhD at my wife's work got an 18...
When somebody asks you to trade your security for freedom, it isn't your freedom they're talking about.
     IQ Test - (inthane-chan) - (70) - Sept. 27, 2005, 07:43:21 AM EDT
         What is this measured on? - (folkert) - (1) - Sept. 28, 2005, 01:41:21 PM EDT
             Honestly don't know. - (inthane-chan) - Sept. 27, 2005, 11:47:25 AM EDT
         I already know I'm an idiot - (tuberculosis) - (1) - Sept. 27, 2005, 12:32:03 PM EDT
             ICLRPD (new thread) - (Steve Lowe) - Sept. 27, 2005, 12:44:34 PM EDT
         IQ: 32 (under scale?) - (ben_tilly) - (8) - Sept. 27, 2005, 01:04:41 PM EDT
             Cool site Ben! - (GBert) - (1) - Sept. 27, 2005, 02:47:49 PM EDT
                 AFAIK, they do - (ben_tilly) - Sept. 27, 2005, 05:26:50 PM EDT
             I'll give it to him - (admin) - (5) - Sept. 27, 2005, 02:55:59 PM EDT
                 Deviation or ratio score in the 180s? - (ben_tilly) - (4) - Sept. 27, 2005, 06:19:29 PM EDT
                     Ratio, probably. - (admin) - (3) - Sept. 27, 2005, 07:06:14 PM EDT
                         One thing "kids like Duncan" are "maddeningly obtuse" about - (drewk) - (1) - Sept. 27, 2005, 08:20:47 PM EDT
                             IQ tests and the unmeasured cute parts - - (Ashton) - Sept. 27, 2005, 10:18:56 PM EDT
                         They measure ability at certain kinds of mental processing - (ben_tilly) - Sept. 27, 2005, 09:30:07 PM EDT
         I was a 29 - (imqwerky) - (1) - Sept. 27, 2005, 01:06:32 PM EDT
             Me too... - (hnick) - Sept. 27, 2005, 04:38:22 PM EDT
         43 -NT - (Yendor) - (6) - Sept. 27, 2005, 01:18:55 PM EDT
             Freak - (tuberculosis) - (5) - Sept. 27, 2005, 03:35:33 PM EDT
                 Nah - (Yendor) - Sept. 27, 2005, 03:44:56 PM EDT
                 Of course they are stupid - (ben_tilly) - (3) - Sept. 27, 2005, 04:53:01 PM EDT
                     Ah -- then its a conformance test - (tuberculosis) - (2) - Sept. 27, 2005, 04:55:29 PM EDT
                         "Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority ..." -NT - (mmoffitt) - Sept. 27, 2005, 05:23:46 PM EDT
                         Not quite... - (ben_tilly) - Sept. 27, 2005, 05:27:36 PM EDT
         Somebody want to clue me in on part 3? - (drewk) - Sept. 27, 2005, 03:15:50 PM EDT
         Got a 22. - (static) - Sept. 27, 2005, 09:50:53 PM EDT
         86, in scale - (cforde) - Sept. 28, 2005, 01:50:56 AM EDT
         32 here. No cheating. *boggle* -NT - (Meerkat) - Sept. 28, 2005, 08:28:41 AM EDT
         Answering no questions: Score = 49. - (Another Scott) - (3) - Sept. 28, 2005, 01:58:06 PM EDT
             The only way to win is not to play... - (hnick) - (2) - Sept. 28, 2005, 02:01:39 PM EDT
                 Yer, right. :-) Try the other one (below). -NT - (Another Scott) - Sept. 28, 2005, 02:14:44 PM EDT
                 'War Games'__silly flik, but then it has lots of company now -NT - (Ashton) - Sept. 28, 2005, 07:23:34 PM EDT
         This one seems to work better. - (Another Scott) - (34) - Sept. 28, 2005, 02:14:17 PM EDT
             138 - (Yendor) - Sept. 28, 2005, 03:11:22 PM EDT
             142 - (folkert) - Sept. 28, 2005, 03:15:08 PM EDT
             144. [Edit:] Yup, time matters: Repeated it, got 185. - (CRConrad) - Sept. 29, 2005, 03:11:35 AM EDT
             163 - (admin) - (2) - Sept. 28, 2005, 07:11:10 PM EDT
                 Odd that - (tuberculosis) - (1) - Sept. 28, 2005, 07:38:37 PM EDT
                     NFC what that measures. - (admin) - Sept. 28, 2005, 07:40:32 PM EDT
             156 / 65 ... stupid test - (drewk) - (2) - Sept. 28, 2005, 08:18:36 PM EDT
                 Think light filters. -NT - (static) - (1) - Sept. 28, 2005, 10:53:41 PM EDT
                     So, Photography Experience=Intelligence. What a BS question! -NT - (CRConrad) - Sept. 29, 2005, 03:12:56 AM EDT
             Speed matters - (ben_tilly) - (2) - Sept. 28, 2005, 09:18:00 PM EDT
                 Indeed. - (Another Scott) - Sept. 28, 2005, 09:26:37 PM EDT
                 That would explain a lot - (tuberculosis) - Sept. 29, 2005, 01:46:34 AM EDT
             165. -NT - (static) - Sept. 28, 2005, 10:54:12 PM EDT
             fwiw: 139 on this one - (cforde) - Sept. 29, 2005, 12:31:01 AM EDT
             World Trivia - (cforde) - (19) - Sept. 29, 2005, 12:57:05 AM EDT
                 26/30 - (ben_tilly) - (2) - Sept. 29, 2005, 01:02:59 AM EDT
                     24 - same message -NT - (tuberculosis) - Sept. 29, 2005, 01:46:05 AM EDT
                     Ditto. -NT - (mmoffitt) - Sept. 29, 2005, 10:52:25 AM EDT
                 23/30 - (Steve Lowe) - (1) - Sept. 29, 2005, 01:17:11 AM EDT
                     Same -NT - (Yendor) - Sept. 29, 2005, 01:44:23 AM EDT
                 29. BTW, It's "Michelangelo" and "Garibaldi". - (CRConrad) - (2) - Sept. 29, 2005, 02:03:54 AM EDT
                     ICLRPD: "stupid test makers!" (new thread) - (Steve Lowe) - Sept. 29, 2005, 03:45:51 AM EDT
                     Same. -NT - (admin) - Sept. 29, 2005, 08:42:18 AM EDT
                 29 -NT - (Silverlock) - Sept. 29, 2005, 08:24:13 AM EDT
                 28/30. -NT - (Another Scott) - Sept. 29, 2005, 08:33:23 AM EDT
                 25/30 -NT - (imqwerky) - Sept. 29, 2005, 09:54:37 AM EDT
                 31/30 -NT - (Ashton) - (3) - Sept. 29, 2005, 03:24:37 PM EDT
                     smartass -NT - (Steve Lowe) - (2) - Sept. 29, 2005, 04:44:55 PM EDT
                         What, you never heard of bonus points for Ashtonese? -NT - (a6l6e6x) - Sept. 29, 2005, 04:49:09 PM EDT
                         I am soo smart - (Ashton) - Sept. 29, 2005, 05:43:04 PM EDT
                 30/30 - (GBert) - (3) - Sept. 29, 2005, 04:58:01 PM EDT
                     I *thought* they had that wrong! - (ben_tilly) - Sept. 29, 2005, 05:41:33 PM EDT
                     Well, that explains my score too then. :-P -NT - (admin) - Sept. 29, 2005, 05:51:09 PM EDT
                     I must confess, I did the same; got only 28 first time round - (CRConrad) - Sept. 30, 2005, 07:06:22 AM EDT
         Age is a factor - (gdaustin) - Sept. 28, 2005, 11:22:07 PM EDT
         Hmm. - (pwhysall) - (3) - Sept. 30, 2005, 07:22:34 AM EDT
             The highest score ever, I'd say. -NT - (Meerkat) - Sept. 30, 2005, 08:24:28 AM EDT
             A Golden Bawk Bawk Award.... ;-) -NT - (Another Scott) - Sept. 30, 2005, 08:40:38 AM EDT
             Exile to Elba? (crowded boat, though) -NT - (Ashton) - Sept. 30, 2005, 04:50:48 PM EDT

How depressing. Brain the size of a planet, and they have me opening doors.
119 ms