This issue with netmasks is often not well explained....I still couldn't say that it is.
(Not that it matters very much, since it seems rather irrelevant to my situation.)
How do I set up multiple LAN connection in Windows 2000 Pro?
- (CRConrad)
- (40)
- Dec. 9, 2002, 08:26:14 AM EST
Slow down, cowboy.
- (pwhysall)
- (13)
- Dec. 9, 2002, 09:04:43 AM EST
What's not to understand???
- (CRConrad)
- (12)
- Dec. 9, 2002, 09:57:07 AM EST
Re: What's not to understand???
- (pwhysall)
- (11)
- Dec. 9, 2002, 10:08:34 AM EST
ifconfig eth0:1
- (boxley)
- (4)
- Dec. 9, 2002, 10:18:10 AM EST
Bad Idea on Windows 2000
-NT
- (pwhysall)
- (3)
- Dec. 9, 2002, 10:20:41 AM EST
why is binding 2 addresses on one nic bad in 2k?
- (boxley)
- (2)
- Dec. 9, 2002, 11:19:06 AM EST
Thanks - saved me an explanation
- (pwhysall)
- Dec. 9, 2002, 11:20:28 AM EST
Not bad at all - very useful
- (deSitter)
- Dec. 9, 2002, 11:55:09 AM EST
Ah, great - will try that. Thanks!!
-NT
- (CRConrad)
- Dec. 9, 2002, 10:41:27 AM EST
Re: What's not to understand???
- (deSitter)
- (3)
- Dec. 9, 2002, 12:02:23 PM EST
Re: What's not to understand???
- (pwhysall)
- (2)
- Dec. 9, 2002, 03:23:00 PM EST
Re: What's not to understand???
- (deSitter)
- (1)
- Dec. 9, 2002, 03:34:41 PM EST
You're doing it again!
- (pwhysall)
- Dec. 9, 2002, 04:12:47 PM EST
Ahhh, that'd be the best way. Winders Hates "fuzzy" stuff...
- (folkert)
- Dec. 9, 2002, 12:53:37 PM EST
Re: How do I set up multiple LAN connection in Windows 2000
- (deSitter)
- (18)
- Dec. 9, 2002, 10:02:28 AM EST
Read the question.
- (pwhysall)
- Dec. 9, 2002, 10:10:05 AM EST
Thing is, I DON'T want to use the secondary NIC...
- (CRConrad)
- (16)
- Dec. 9, 2002, 10:15:05 AM EST
Thoughts on That
- (deSitter)
- (15)
- Dec. 9, 2002, 11:51:47 AM EST
Reading between the lines
- (jbrabeck)
- (6)
- Dec. 9, 2002, 02:12:21 PM EST
Re: Reading between the lines
- (deSitter)
- (4)
- Dec. 9, 2002, 03:08:35 PM EST
Oh hush.
- (pwhysall)
- (3)
- Dec. 9, 2002, 03:18:31 PM EST
Aha!
- (folkert)
- (2)
- Dec. 9, 2002, 03:54:55 PM EST
You rang?
- (static)
- (1)
- Dec. 10, 2002, 01:57:01 AM EST
Yeah...
- (folkert)
- Dec. 10, 2002, 09:12:45 AM EST
Yup, that's it exactly. (Wasn't that *obvious* to everyone?)
-NT
- (CRConrad)
- Dec. 11, 2002, 05:10:08 PM EST
Windows does not particularly like
- (folkert)
- (3)
- Dec. 9, 2002, 02:31:53 PM EST
Correct
- (deSitter)
- (2)
- Dec. 9, 2002, 03:10:55 PM EST
Might be interested to know... (new thread)
- (folkert)
- Dec. 9, 2002, 06:41:37 PM EST
Unfortunately...
- (CRConrad)
- Dec. 11, 2002, 05:08:29 PM EST
Sorry, but Peter's right - you Just Don't Get It.
- (CRConrad)
- (3)
- Dec. 11, 2002, 05:32:21 PM EST
I think... therefore I might just understand...
- (folkert)
- Dec. 11, 2002, 07:38:09 PM EST
Re: Sorry, but Peter's right - you Just Don't Get It.
- (deSitter)
- (1)
- Dec. 11, 2002, 10:04:07 PM EST
I know of several companies
- (boxley)
- Dec. 11, 2002, 10:50:28 PM EST
Windows won't
- (scoenye)
- (6)
- Dec. 12, 2002, 02:32:25 PM EST
Ackshully
- (pwhysall)
- (5)
- Dec. 12, 2002, 09:44:40 PM EST
Fucking Whoopee
- (deSitter)
- (4)
- Dec. 12, 2002, 10:13:30 PM EST
No you can't.
- (pwhysall)
- (3)
- Dec. 12, 2002, 11:38:28 PM EST
Re: No you can't.
- (deSitter)
- (2)
- Dec. 12, 2002, 11:48:17 PM EST
As usual...
- (pwhysall)
- (1)
- Dec. 13, 2002, 12:03:00 AM EST
Re: As usual...
- (deSitter)
- Dec. 13, 2002, 11:17:43 AM EST
