ifconfig eth0:1

1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 1 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #67,483 by boxley 12/9/02 10:18:10 AM Reply	ifconfig eth0:1 works on nix why did you make the statement SHORT OF actually binding two different IP addresses to the same card. Trust me, you don't want to do that why not? thanx, bill will work for cash and other incentives [link\|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html\|skill set] Opera was the television of the nineteenth century:loud, vulgar and garish with plots that could only be called infantile. "Pendergast"
Post #67,485 by pwhysall 12/9/02 10:20:41 AM Reply	Bad Idea on Windows 2000 Peter [link\|http://www.debian.org\|Shill For Hire] [link\|http://www.kuro5hin.org\|There is no K5 Cabal] [link\|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org\|Blog]
Post #67,520 by boxley 12/9/02 11:19:06 AM Reply	why is binding 2 addresses on one nic bad in 2k? the OS cant handle aliasing? thanx, bill will work for cash and other incentives [link\|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html\|skill set] Opera was the television of the nineteenth century:loud, vulgar and garish with plots that could only be called infantile. "Pendergast"
Post #67,522 by pwhysall 12/9/02 11:20:28 AM Reply	Thanks - saved me an explanation That's basically it. Peter [link\|http://www.debian.org\|Shill For Hire] [link\|http://www.kuro5hin.org\|There is no K5 Cabal] [link\|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org\|Blog]
Post #67,539 by deSitter 12/9/02 11:55:09 AM Reply	Not bad at all - very useful My external NIC is configured with two separate IP addresses. I can run a website on one port of the alternate address and block everything else to that address. I use the primary address for letting the internal network see the outside world. The primary address is invisible to the world - incoming packets are all dropped unless they have an entry in the NAT table, i.e. originated on the inside. -drl

How do I set up multiple LAN connection in Windows 2000 Pro? - (CRConrad) - (40) - Dec. 9, 2002, 08:26:14 AM EST

Slow down, cowboy. - (pwhysall) - (13) - Dec. 9, 2002, 09:04:43 AM EST

What's not to understand??? - (CRConrad) - (12) - Dec. 9, 2002, 09:57:07 AM EST

Re: What's not to understand??? - (pwhysall) - (11) - Dec. 9, 2002, 10:08:34 AM EST

ifconfig eth0:1 - (boxley) - (4) - Dec. 9, 2002, 10:18:10 AM EST

Bad Idea on Windows 2000 -NT - (pwhysall) - (3) - Dec. 9, 2002, 10:20:41 AM EST

why is binding 2 addresses on one nic bad in 2k? - (boxley) - (2) - Dec. 9, 2002, 11:19:06 AM EST

Thanks - saved me an explanation - (pwhysall) - Dec. 9, 2002, 11:20:28 AM EST

Not bad at all - very useful - (deSitter) - Dec. 9, 2002, 11:55:09 AM EST

Ah, great - will try that. Thanks!! -NT - (CRConrad) - Dec. 9, 2002, 10:41:27 AM EST

Re: What's not to understand??? - (deSitter) - (3) - Dec. 9, 2002, 12:02:23 PM EST

Re: What's not to understand??? - (pwhysall) - (2) - Dec. 9, 2002, 03:23:00 PM EST

Re: What's not to understand??? - (deSitter) - (1) - Dec. 9, 2002, 03:34:41 PM EST

You're doing it again! - (pwhysall) - Dec. 9, 2002, 04:12:47 PM EST

Ahhh, that'd be the best way. Winders Hates "fuzzy" stuff... - (folkert) - Dec. 9, 2002, 12:53:37 PM EST

Re: How do I set up multiple LAN connection in Windows 2000 - (deSitter) - (18) - Dec. 9, 2002, 10:02:28 AM EST

Read the question. - (pwhysall) - Dec. 9, 2002, 10:10:05 AM EST

Thing is, I DON'T want to use the secondary NIC... - (CRConrad) - (16) - Dec. 9, 2002, 10:15:05 AM EST

Thoughts on That - (deSitter) - (15) - Dec. 9, 2002, 11:51:47 AM EST

Reading between the lines - (jbrabeck) - (6) - Dec. 9, 2002, 02:12:21 PM EST

Re: Reading between the lines - (deSitter) - (4) - Dec. 9, 2002, 03:08:35 PM EST

Oh hush. - (pwhysall) - (3) - Dec. 9, 2002, 03:18:31 PM EST

Aha! - (folkert) - (2) - Dec. 9, 2002, 03:54:55 PM EST

You rang? - (static) - (1) - Dec. 10, 2002, 01:57:01 AM EST

Yeah... - (folkert) - Dec. 10, 2002, 09:12:45 AM EST

Yup, that's it exactly. (Wasn't that *obvious* to everyone?) -NT - (CRConrad) - Dec. 11, 2002, 05:10:08 PM EST

Windows does not particularly like - (folkert) - (3) - Dec. 9, 2002, 02:31:53 PM EST

Correct - (deSitter) - (2) - Dec. 9, 2002, 03:10:55 PM EST

Might be interested to know... (new thread) - (folkert) - Dec. 9, 2002, 06:41:37 PM EST

Unfortunately... - (CRConrad) - Dec. 11, 2002, 05:08:29 PM EST

Sorry, but Peter's right - you Just Don't Get It. - (CRConrad) - (3) - Dec. 11, 2002, 05:32:21 PM EST

I think... therefore I might just understand... - (folkert) - Dec. 11, 2002, 07:38:09 PM EST

Re: Sorry, but Peter's right - you Just Don't Get It. - (deSitter) - (1) - Dec. 11, 2002, 10:04:07 PM EST

I know of several companies - (boxley) - Dec. 11, 2002, 10:50:28 PM EST

Windows won't - (scoenye) - (6) - Dec. 12, 2002, 02:32:25 PM EST

Ackshully - (pwhysall) - (5) - Dec. 12, 2002, 09:44:40 PM EST

Fucking Whoopee - (deSitter) - (4) - Dec. 12, 2002, 10:13:30 PM EST

No you can't. - (pwhysall) - (3) - Dec. 12, 2002, 11:38:28 PM EST

Re: No you can't. - (deSitter) - (2) - Dec. 12, 2002, 11:48:17 PM EST

As usual... - (pwhysall) - (1) - Dec. 13, 2002, 12:03:00 AM EST

Re: As usual... - (deSitter) - Dec. 13, 2002, 11:17:43 AM EST

iwethey.org

Your Bork God[tm] was HERE!
67 ms