Windows does not particularly like

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #67,593 by folkert 12/9/02 2:31:53 PM Reply	Windows does not particularly like Out of Bit order Subnet Masking. It gets confused sometimes. Well, most of the time you run them concurrently. Running a SNM of 255.255.255.240 is just fine Windows won't have a cow on this one. But 255.255.255.16... Yikes it'll screw up the XOR if the same interface has the other active SNM active also. Only time I use OOBSNM is when I am short on available IP Ranges, and I have to get places connected using those. Most of the time I just use a 255.255.255.252 (or 4 address routing network). I rather use a variable length subnet mask than an out of bit order one. Less headache and doesn't go against the CIDR stuff(big, Big, BIG) out there. All int all, OOBSNMs are not a truly supported option in most of the Older Routers and Switches out there. It'll confuse them as well. BE careful where you use it. `[link\|mailto:curley95@attbi.com\|greg] - Grand-Master Artist in IT [link\|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry/\|REMEMBER ED CURRY!!!]` Your friendly Geheime Staatspolizei reminds: [link\|http://www.wired.com/news/wireless/0,1382,56742,00.html\|Wi-Fi enabled device use] comes with an all inclusive free trip to the (county)Photographer! Overbooking, is a problem, please be prepared for "room-ies". Why You ask? Here is the answer to your query: `SELECT * FROM politicians WHERE iq > 40 OR \\ WHERE ego < 1048575; 0 rows found`
Post #67,604 by deSitter 12/9/02 3:10:55 PM Reply	Correct I was just giving illustrative examples. This issue with netmasks is often not well explained. -drl
Post #67,651 by folkert 12/9/02 6:41:37 PM Reply	Might be interested to know... (new thread) Created as new thread #67650 titled [link\|/forums/render/content/show?contentid=67650\|Might be interested to know...] `[link\|mailto:curley95@attbi.com\|greg] - Grand-Master Artist in IT [link\|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry/\|REMEMBER ED CURRY!!!]` Your friendly Geheime Staatspolizei reminds: [link\|http://www.wired.com/news/wireless/0,1382,56742,00.html\|Wi-Fi enabled device use] comes with an all inclusive free trip to the (county)Photographer! Overbooking, is a problem, please be prepared for "room-ies". Why You ask? Here is the answer to your query: `SELECT * FROM politicians WHERE iq > 40 OR \\ WHERE ego < 1048575; 0 rows found`
Post #68,213 by CRConrad 12/11/02 5:07:18 PM 12/11/02 5:08:29 PM Reply	Unfortunately... This issue with netmasks is often not well explained. ...I still couldn't say that it is. (Not that it matters very much, since it seems rather irrelevant to my situation.) Christian R. Conrad Mechanisation As our souls are slowly stolen The wheels of progress keep steamrolling Mechanisation melts our minds To drive the furnace that drives us blind. -- [link\|http://www.vergenet.net/~conrad/poetry/mechanisation.html\|© Conrad Parker, 1993] Edited by CRConrad Dec. 11, 2002, 05:08:29 PM EST Expand All History

How do I set up multiple LAN connection in Windows 2000 Pro? - (CRConrad) - (40) - Dec. 9, 2002, 08:26:14 AM EST

Slow down, cowboy. - (pwhysall) - (13) - Dec. 9, 2002, 09:04:43 AM EST

What's not to understand??? - (CRConrad) - (12) - Dec. 9, 2002, 09:57:07 AM EST

Re: What's not to understand??? - (pwhysall) - (11) - Dec. 9, 2002, 10:08:34 AM EST

ifconfig eth0:1 - (boxley) - (4) - Dec. 9, 2002, 10:18:10 AM EST

Bad Idea on Windows 2000 -NT - (pwhysall) - (3) - Dec. 9, 2002, 10:20:41 AM EST

why is binding 2 addresses on one nic bad in 2k? - (boxley) - (2) - Dec. 9, 2002, 11:19:06 AM EST

Thanks - saved me an explanation - (pwhysall) - Dec. 9, 2002, 11:20:28 AM EST

Not bad at all - very useful - (deSitter) - Dec. 9, 2002, 11:55:09 AM EST

Ah, great - will try that. Thanks!! -NT - (CRConrad) - Dec. 9, 2002, 10:41:27 AM EST

Re: What's not to understand??? - (deSitter) - (3) - Dec. 9, 2002, 12:02:23 PM EST

Re: What's not to understand??? - (pwhysall) - (2) - Dec. 9, 2002, 03:23:00 PM EST

Re: What's not to understand??? - (deSitter) - (1) - Dec. 9, 2002, 03:34:41 PM EST

You're doing it again! - (pwhysall) - Dec. 9, 2002, 04:12:47 PM EST

Ahhh, that'd be the best way. Winders Hates "fuzzy" stuff... - (folkert) - Dec. 9, 2002, 12:53:37 PM EST

Re: How do I set up multiple LAN connection in Windows 2000 - (deSitter) - (18) - Dec. 9, 2002, 10:02:28 AM EST

Read the question. - (pwhysall) - Dec. 9, 2002, 10:10:05 AM EST

Thing is, I DON'T want to use the secondary NIC... - (CRConrad) - (16) - Dec. 9, 2002, 10:15:05 AM EST

Thoughts on That - (deSitter) - (15) - Dec. 9, 2002, 11:51:47 AM EST

Reading between the lines - (jbrabeck) - (6) - Dec. 9, 2002, 02:12:21 PM EST

Re: Reading between the lines - (deSitter) - (4) - Dec. 9, 2002, 03:08:35 PM EST

Oh hush. - (pwhysall) - (3) - Dec. 9, 2002, 03:18:31 PM EST

Aha! - (folkert) - (2) - Dec. 9, 2002, 03:54:55 PM EST

You rang? - (static) - (1) - Dec. 10, 2002, 01:57:01 AM EST

Yeah... - (folkert) - Dec. 10, 2002, 09:12:45 AM EST

Yup, that's it exactly. (Wasn't that *obvious* to everyone?) -NT - (CRConrad) - Dec. 11, 2002, 05:10:08 PM EST

Windows does not particularly like - (folkert) - (3) - Dec. 9, 2002, 02:31:53 PM EST

Correct - (deSitter) - (2) - Dec. 9, 2002, 03:10:55 PM EST

Might be interested to know... (new thread) - (folkert) - Dec. 9, 2002, 06:41:37 PM EST

Unfortunately... - (CRConrad) - Dec. 11, 2002, 05:08:29 PM EST

Sorry, but Peter's right - you Just Don't Get It. - (CRConrad) - (3) - Dec. 11, 2002, 05:32:21 PM EST

I think... therefore I might just understand... - (folkert) - Dec. 11, 2002, 07:38:09 PM EST

Re: Sorry, but Peter's right - you Just Don't Get It. - (deSitter) - (1) - Dec. 11, 2002, 10:04:07 PM EST

I know of several companies - (boxley) - Dec. 11, 2002, 10:50:28 PM EST

Windows won't - (scoenye) - (6) - Dec. 12, 2002, 02:32:25 PM EST

Ackshully - (pwhysall) - (5) - Dec. 12, 2002, 09:44:40 PM EST

Fucking Whoopee - (deSitter) - (4) - Dec. 12, 2002, 10:13:30 PM EST

No you can't. - (pwhysall) - (3) - Dec. 12, 2002, 11:38:28 PM EST

Re: No you can't. - (deSitter) - (2) - Dec. 12, 2002, 11:48:17 PM EST

As usual... - (pwhysall) - (1) - Dec. 13, 2002, 12:03:00 AM EST

Re: As usual... - (deSitter) - Dec. 13, 2002, 11:17:43 AM EST

iwethey.org

NaN
120 ms