IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Re: What's not to understand???
I want to attach a computer to a Local Area Network. (This works, already.)


Okay.

Then I want to attach the same computer to *another* Local Area Network. (This works too, after a fashion.)


Nod.

The Local Area Networks are slightly different. (Of course... How could they NOT be?)


Indeed.

So the computer should be configured slightly differently for each Local Area Network. (This is what *doesn't* work, right now... Except by changing each setting manually. (That's what I mean by "after a fashion", above.))


Okay, I now start to see what you want.

What I want to do is set up these slightly differently-configured Local Area Network connections on the computer, so both alternatives are readily available under the "Network" menu-thingy under the the "Settings" menu-thingy under the Start button.


You want to have two sets of network settings for the same network card, I think...

So I won't have to right-click *the single* Local Area Network connection I have there, click "Properties", select "TCP/IP Protocol", click "Properties"... And so on and so on, each and every time I disconnect the computer from one Local Area Network and connect it to another one, you see?


...I think correctly.

This has, AFAICS, fuck-all to do with "configuration of hardware" since it happens the same way with all machines I've tried it with. Yeah, well, OK, *both* machines... :-) But still!


It sort of HAS got something to do with hardware. I shall explain shortly.

Here's what you need to do.

You need to set up a second hardware profile on the box. This is the only way to have two sets of network settings on the same physical card - SHORT OF actually binding two different IP addresses to the same card. Trust me, you don't want to do that.

Here's how you create another hardware profile:

1. Start->Settings->Control Panel->System
2. Choose the Hardware tab
3. Click Hardware Profiles
4. Click Copy...
5. Type in a name for the new profile
6. Reboot
7. At the choice screen, choose the new hardware profile
8. Log in as you usually would, and then configure the TCP/IP settings as you want for the other network

When you want to revert to the original network settings, reboot and use the original hardware profile.


Peter
[link|http://www.debian.org|Shill For Hire]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Blog]
New ifconfig eth0:1
works on nix why did you make the statement
SHORT OF actually binding two different IP addresses to the same card. Trust me, you don't want to do that
why not?
thanx,
bill
will work for cash and other incentives [link|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html|skill set]


Opera was the television of the nineteenth century:loud, vulgar and garish with plots that could only be called infantile. "Pendergast"
New Bad Idea on Windows 2000


Peter
[link|http://www.debian.org|Shill For Hire]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Blog]
New why is binding 2 addresses on one nic bad in 2k?
the OS cant handle aliasing?
thanx,
bill
will work for cash and other incentives [link|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html|skill set]


Opera was the television of the nineteenth century:loud, vulgar and garish with plots that could only be called infantile. "Pendergast"
New Thanks - saved me an explanation
That's basically it.


Peter
[link|http://www.debian.org|Shill For Hire]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Blog]
New Not bad at all - very useful
My external NIC is configured with two separate IP addresses. I can run a website on one port of the alternate address and block everything else to that address. I use the primary address for letting the internal network see the outside world. The primary address is invisible to the world - incoming packets are all dropped unless they have an entry in the NAT table, i.e. originated on the inside.
-drl
New Ah, great - will try that. Thanks!!
New Re: What's not to understand???

Here's what you need to do.

You need to set up a second hardware profile on the box. This is the only way to have two sets of network settings on the same physical card - SHORT OF actually binding two different IP addresses to the same card. Trust me, you don't want to do that.

This is a terrible idea! Even if it works (no intervening switch to drop packets, unlikely on a corporate net) it's a horrible violation of good network administration.

As for not using a second IP address on the same interface, there are very good reasons to do that (see below) but they are not related to CRC's problem.
-drl
New Re: What's not to understand???
You need to set up a second hardware profile on the box. This is the only way to have two sets of network settings on the same physical card - SHORT OF actually binding two different IP addresses to the same card. Trust me, you don't want to do that.

This is a terrible idea! Even if it works (no intervening switch to drop packets, unlikely on a corporate net) it's a horrible violation of good network administration.

Like bollocks it is. And in usual hit'n'run fashion, there's no exposition of why my perfectly working solution to Christian's problem is "terrible".

You're getting very good at spouting impressive-sounding but fundamentally broken advice, Ross.


Peter
[link|http://www.debian.org|Shill For Hire]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Blog]
New Re: What's not to understand???
??

You simply don't run logically distinct networks on the same segment! As mentioned below, if the need for that arise (say, you're an ISP doling out IP address ranges on a given subnet) then you manage it with custom netmasks.

This is elementary IP networking.
-drl
New You're doing it again!
Just saying "I am Ross, hear me roar, this is the way it is" cuts no ice with me.

Either explain yourself or SHUT UP.


Peter
[link|http://www.debian.org|Shill For Hire]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Blog]
New Ahhh, that'd be the best way. Winders Hates "fuzzy" stuff...
But it can deal with hardware profiles... being exactly the same, but different config...

You can then tailor each profile for localized settings.

[link|mailto:curley95@attbi.com|greg] - Grand-Master Artist in IT
[link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry/|REMEMBER ED CURRY!!!]


Your friendly Geheime Staatspolizei reminds:
[link|http://www.wired.com/news/wireless/0,1382,56742,00.html|Wi-Fi enabled device use] comes with an all inclusive
free trip to the (county)Photographer!

Overbooking, is a problem, please be prepared for "room-ies".

Why You ask? Here is the answer to your query:
SELECT * FROM politicians WHERE iq > 40 OR \\
  WHERE ego < 1048575;
0 rows found
     How do I set up multiple LAN connection in Windows 2000 Pro? - (CRConrad) - (40)
         Slow down, cowboy. - (pwhysall) - (13)
             What's not to understand??? - (CRConrad) - (12)
                 Re: What's not to understand??? - (pwhysall) - (11)
                     ifconfig eth0:1 - (boxley) - (4)
                         Bad Idea on Windows 2000 -NT - (pwhysall) - (3)
                             why is binding 2 addresses on one nic bad in 2k? - (boxley) - (2)
                                 Thanks - saved me an explanation - (pwhysall)
                                 Not bad at all - very useful - (deSitter)
                     Ah, great - will try that. Thanks!! -NT - (CRConrad)
                     Re: What's not to understand??? - (deSitter) - (3)
                         Re: What's not to understand??? - (pwhysall) - (2)
                             Re: What's not to understand??? - (deSitter) - (1)
                                 You're doing it again! - (pwhysall)
                     Ahhh, that'd be the best way. Winders Hates "fuzzy" stuff... - (folkert)
         Re: How do I set up multiple LAN connection in Windows 2000 - (deSitter) - (18)
             Read the question. - (pwhysall)
             Thing is, I DON'T want to use the secondary NIC... - (CRConrad) - (16)
                 Thoughts on That - (deSitter) - (15)
                     Reading between the lines - (jbrabeck) - (6)
                         Re: Reading between the lines - (deSitter) - (4)
                             Oh hush. - (pwhysall) - (3)
                                 Aha! - (folkert) - (2)
                                     You rang? - (static) - (1)
                                         Yeah... - (folkert)
                         Yup, that's it exactly. (Wasn't that *obvious* to everyone?) -NT - (CRConrad)
                     Windows does not particularly like - (folkert) - (3)
                         Correct - (deSitter) - (2)
                             Might be interested to know... (new thread) - (folkert)
                             Unfortunately... - (CRConrad)
                     Sorry, but Peter's right - you Just Don't Get It. - (CRConrad) - (3)
                         I think... therefore I might just understand... - (folkert)
                         Re: Sorry, but Peter's right - you Just Don't Get It. - (deSitter) - (1)
                             I know of several companies - (boxley)
         Windows won't - (scoenye) - (6)
             Ackshully - (pwhysall) - (5)
                 Fucking Whoopee - (deSitter) - (4)
                     No you can't. - (pwhysall) - (3)
                         Re: No you can't. - (deSitter) - (2)
                             As usual... - (pwhysall) - (1)
                                 Re: As usual... - (deSitter)

What you're selling, I do not need.
74 ms