IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Windows vX.X Forum / Bad Idea on Windows 2000
Post #67,485
by pwhysall
Picture of pwhysall
12/9/02 10:20:41 AM
Reply
New Bad Idea on Windows 2000

Peter
[link|http://www.debian.org|Shill For Hire]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Blog]
Post #67,520
by boxley
12/9/02 11:19:06 AM
Reply
New why is binding 2 addresses on one nic bad in 2k?
the OS cant handle aliasing?
thanx,
bill
will work for cash and other incentives [link|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html|skill set]


Opera was the television of the nineteenth century:loud, vulgar and garish with plots that could only be called infantile. "Pendergast"
Post #67,522
by pwhysall
Picture of pwhysall
12/9/02 11:20:28 AM
Reply
New Thanks - saved me an explanation
That's basically it.

Peter
[link|http://www.debian.org|Shill For Hire]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Blog]
Post #67,539
by deSitter
Picture of deSitter
12/9/02 11:55:09 AM
Reply
New Not bad at all - very useful
My external NIC is configured with two separate IP addresses. I can run a website on one port of the alternate address and block everything else to that address. I use the primary address for letting the internal network see the outside world. The primary address is invisible to the world - incoming packets are all dropped unless they have an entry in the NAT table, i.e. originated on the inside.
-drl
     How do I set up multiple LAN connection in Windows 2000 Pro? - (CRConrad) - (40) - Dec. 9, 2002, 08:26:14 AM EST
         Slow down, cowboy. - (pwhysall) - (13) - Dec. 9, 2002, 09:04:43 AM EST
             What's not to understand??? - (CRConrad) - (12) - Dec. 9, 2002, 09:57:07 AM EST
                 Re: What's not to understand??? - (pwhysall) - (11) - Dec. 9, 2002, 10:08:34 AM EST
                     ifconfig eth0:1 - (boxley) - (4) - Dec. 9, 2002, 10:18:10 AM EST
                         Bad Idea on Windows 2000 -NT - (pwhysall) - (3) - Dec. 9, 2002, 10:20:41 AM EST
                             why is binding 2 addresses on one nic bad in 2k? - (boxley) - (2) - Dec. 9, 2002, 11:19:06 AM EST
                                 Thanks - saved me an explanation - (pwhysall) - Dec. 9, 2002, 11:20:28 AM EST
                                 Not bad at all - very useful - (deSitter) - Dec. 9, 2002, 11:55:09 AM EST
                     Ah, great - will try that. Thanks!! -NT - (CRConrad) - Dec. 9, 2002, 10:41:27 AM EST
                     Re: What's not to understand??? - (deSitter) - (3) - Dec. 9, 2002, 12:02:23 PM EST
                         Re: What's not to understand??? - (pwhysall) - (2) - Dec. 9, 2002, 03:23:00 PM EST
                             Re: What's not to understand??? - (deSitter) - (1) - Dec. 9, 2002, 03:34:41 PM EST
                                 You're doing it again! - (pwhysall) - Dec. 9, 2002, 04:12:47 PM EST
                     Ahhh, that'd be the best way. Winders Hates "fuzzy" stuff... - (folkert) - Dec. 9, 2002, 12:53:37 PM EST
         Re: How do I set up multiple LAN connection in Windows 2000 - (deSitter) - (18) - Dec. 9, 2002, 10:02:28 AM EST
             Read the question. - (pwhysall) - Dec. 9, 2002, 10:10:05 AM EST
             Thing is, I DON'T want to use the secondary NIC... - (CRConrad) - (16) - Dec. 9, 2002, 10:15:05 AM EST
                 Thoughts on That - (deSitter) - (15) - Dec. 9, 2002, 11:51:47 AM EST
                     Reading between the lines - (jbrabeck) - (6) - Dec. 9, 2002, 02:12:21 PM EST
                         Re: Reading between the lines - (deSitter) - (4) - Dec. 9, 2002, 03:08:35 PM EST
                             Oh hush. - (pwhysall) - (3) - Dec. 9, 2002, 03:18:31 PM EST
                                 Aha! - (folkert) - (2) - Dec. 9, 2002, 03:54:55 PM EST
                                     You rang? - (static) - (1) - Dec. 10, 2002, 01:57:01 AM EST
                                         Yeah... - (folkert) - Dec. 10, 2002, 09:12:45 AM EST
                         Yup, that's it exactly. (Wasn't that *obvious* to everyone?) -NT - (CRConrad) - Dec. 11, 2002, 05:10:08 PM EST
                     Windows does not particularly like - (folkert) - (3) - Dec. 9, 2002, 02:31:53 PM EST
                         Correct - (deSitter) - (2) - Dec. 9, 2002, 03:10:55 PM EST
                             Might be interested to know... (new thread) - (folkert) - Dec. 9, 2002, 06:41:37 PM EST
                             Unfortunately... - (CRConrad) - Dec. 11, 2002, 05:08:29 PM EST
                     Sorry, but Peter's right - you Just Don't Get It. - (CRConrad) - (3) - Dec. 11, 2002, 05:32:21 PM EST
                         I think... therefore I might just understand... - (folkert) - Dec. 11, 2002, 07:38:09 PM EST
                         Re: Sorry, but Peter's right - you Just Don't Get It. - (deSitter) - (1) - Dec. 11, 2002, 10:04:07 PM EST
                             I know of several companies - (boxley) - Dec. 11, 2002, 10:50:28 PM EST
         Windows won't - (scoenye) - (6) - Dec. 12, 2002, 02:32:25 PM EST
             Ackshully - (pwhysall) - (5) - Dec. 12, 2002, 09:44:40 PM EST
                 Fucking Whoopee - (deSitter) - (4) - Dec. 12, 2002, 10:13:30 PM EST
                     No you can't. - (pwhysall) - (3) - Dec. 12, 2002, 11:38:28 PM EST
                         Re: No you can't. - (deSitter) - (2) - Dec. 12, 2002, 11:48:17 PM EST
                             As usual... - (pwhysall) - (1) - Dec. 13, 2002, 12:03:00 AM EST
                                 Re: As usual... - (deSitter) - Dec. 13, 2002, 11:17:43 AM EST

We've spent the past two years building up an immunity to Iocaine!
136 ms