IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New just following orders
[The NSA is] doing what the US Congress told them to do.
I'd be very surprised if the relevant legislation did not prove to have been in large part drafted by the NSA, wouldn't you?

cordially,
New Dunno.
Does it matter?

Do you really think that the NSA wants to spy on Americans? If so, why?

The people who work for the NSA aren't extra-terrestrials who live in gated communities and never interact with other people. They're tens of thousands of people just like you and me. Do you think they want to be spied on by their employer when it is illegal to do so?

http://nymag.com/dai...es-100-words.html

My $0.02.

Cheers,
Scott.
(Who feels like he's beating this topic to death...)
New Hokay
I'm going to risk sounding mysterious, and I don't wish to, but ever since Flatline, Comatose, Torpor & Drowse mutated into BrainDead Systems, my work has brought me into way closer daily contact with the security organs, though not the NSA, than I ever anticipated. I do not mean to suggest by this that I am privy to exotic or secret information: I am not, and frankly my masters would be crazy, or at least highly ill-advised, to entrust me with such. But I've learned a thing or two about the institutional mindsets of various parts of Homeland Security (NSA is run by Defense, I believe), and so far as I may extrapolate from this experience, I'm guessing that what the "tens of thousands of people just like you and me" on the NSA payroll think—and a non-negligible fraction of these are going to be True Believers—matters not a rat's ass in terms of policy formulation, and that the agency's senior managers are motivated first and foremost by the imperative of accumulating institutional power. Now, maybe I'm wrong, and maybe they have a completely different institutional culture than the Homeland Security boys do. But if the culture is similar, then those senior managers utterly conflate that imperative with the agency's notional mission (all of them variations on the tired old theme of "Keeping America Safe"), and sincerely believe that any obstacle placed before them, any restraint on the exercise, scope or growth of their authority, endangers this country.

Again, I don't want to sound like I'm privy to the mindset of the Federal Illuminati or anything like that, but I've seen, I continue to see even from my somewhat oblique position, ample and daily evidence of this mindset, "the sombre imbecility of tyranny," as Conrad (Joseph, not Christian) once memorably called it. And as to the rank-and-file NSA worker bees who are like you and me? Hey, I've trespassed in small ways against the dictates of my conscience over the past ten years, and because I'm neither as idealistic, reckless or courageous as Manning and Snowden, I'd probably be prepared to trample on it considerably harder in the admittedly unlikely event it was required of me because—modified Nuremberg defense—I have a mortgage to pay. If we're ever reduced to relying on employees and contractors and peripheral personnel as craven as I am as the last bulwark of our civil liberties, then we'll be buried so deep in shit that we'll never dig out.

cordially,
New Bloody Cousin Joe, always stealing all my best lines!
...long before I even got the chance to say 'em myself! I ask you, is that fair?!?
--
Christian R. Conrad
Same old username (as above), but now on iki.fi

(Yeah, yeah, it redirects to the same old GMail... But just in case I ever want to change.)
     Greenwald's partner detained - (rcareaga) - (71)
         already there, just going to get worse -NT - (boxley)
         Hmm... - (Another Scott) - (54)
             It isn't surprising to anyone. - (mmoffitt) - (43)
                 Of course. Exactly right. <rolls-eyes> -NT - (Another Scott) - (42)
                     Boot lickers galore in that thread - (jake123) - (1)
                         From the inside looking out... - (folkert)
                     What are you roll-eyeing about, exactly? - (CRConrad) - (39)
                         Shades of grey are important. - (Another Scott) - (38)
                             "Potential"?!?Did they just "potentially" detain mr Miranda? - (CRConrad) - (37)
                                 Did they break the law in detaining him? - (Another Scott) - (32)
                                     Come on now, I think he's been pretty clear - (drook) - (3)
                                         Fine. - (Another Scott) - (2)
                                             But Scott... - (rcareaga) - (1)
                                                 Thank you for the thoughtful response. I appreciate it. -NT - (Another Scott)
                                     Stazi had the law on their side, what they did was legal -NT - (boxley) - (26)
                                         And??? - (Another Scott) - (25)
                                             No one here has claimed that - (rcareaga) - (22)
                                                 Brief answers. - (Another Scott) - (21)
                                                     just following orders - (rcareaga) - (3)
                                                         Dunno. - (Another Scott) - (2)
                                                             Hokay - (rcareaga) - (1)
                                                                 Bloody Cousin Joe, always stealing all my best lines! - (CRConrad)
                                                     You're scaring me.. - (Ashton) - (16)
                                                         Just my opinions... - (Another Scott) - (15)
                                                             Re: Just my opinions... - (rcareaga) - (1)
                                                                 they werren't lawyers were they? -NT - (boxley)
                                                             naw don't stop - (boxley) - (5)
                                                                 Good lord, boxley - (rcareaga) - (3)
                                                                     The misrepresentation was ... - (mmoffitt)
                                                                     I know that it was meant that their system would bury ours - (boxley) - (1)
                                                                         Agree; it was a collective effort, though.. - (Ashton)
                                                                 Driving While... Black, Indian, Homo? - (CRConrad)
                                                             If I offended you, I apologize. - (mmoffitt) - (6)
                                                                 No offense taken, and none given, I hope. - (Another Scott) - (5)
                                                                     Certainly none taken here, as well. - (Ashton) - (4)
                                                                         Nope, that's actually not the main effect. - (CRConrad) - (3)
                                                                             It could be a Right- Left- Orthogonal- brain dysfunction, - (Ashton) - (2)
                                                                                 Sorry, was that intended only for the BOx? - (CRConrad) - (1)
                                                                                     IF !=a bi-brain like 'us', but has a tri-brain? THEN: - (Ashton)
                                             think you skipped a paragraph - (boxley) - (1)
                                                 And the answer, of course, was provided in Nuremberg. - (CRConrad)
                                     Did I say what the Gestapo and Cheka did was illegal? - (CRConrad)
                                 IRLRPD - (rcareaga) - (3)
                                     ;^> - (Ashton) - (1)
                                         Naah; I think I introduced it here, to this gang... - (CRConrad)
                                     "Du bist Willkommen", as the Germans say. - (CRConrad)
             So, Scott... - (rcareaga) - (9)
                 I understand that appearance. - (Another Scott) - (8)
                     quod erat demonstrandum - (rcareaga) - (7)
                         Perhaps inartfully expressed. - (Another Scott) - (6)
                             My point being... - (rcareaga) - (5)
                                 Amen. -NT - (mmoffitt)
                                 Reasonable points, but... - (Another Scott) - (3)
                                     Didja see the Movie - 2 Guns? - (folkert) - (2)
                                         I'll put it on the list. Thanks. -NT - (Another Scott) - (1)
                                             If you watch it soon... - (folkert)
         Blowback already? - (mmoffitt) - (6)
             I'm Shocked, Shocked!!!11 - (Another Scott) - (5)
                 bwahahahaha - (boxley) - (4)
                     I imagine that voter still thinks - (rcareaga) - (3)
                         I think... - (folkert)
                         2008 was a bad year for me. I lost my naivete that year. - (mmoffitt) - (1)
                             Don't get disillusioned. - (Another Scott)
         Wonkette's take. - (Another Scott) - (2)
             yes wonkette's preferences are noted in the comments - (boxley) - (1)
                 Was also said in the first paragraph. ;-) -NT - (Another Scott)
         all perfectly legal - (rcareaga) - (1)
             Looks to me like they did an epic job of trolling the UK gov -NT - (jake123)
         Pierce weighs in - (rcareaga) - (2)
             Heh. -NT - (Another Scott)
             having worked around security types in the past - (boxley)

Ah yes, "Lambicus cetafermentum", otherwise known as the Greater Belgian Whale.
163 ms