IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Reviews Forum / Sorry, they are being consistent
Post #26,022
by ben_tilly
1/28/02 7:37:51 AM
Reply
New Sorry, they are being consistent
The Bible warns against false prophets, etc.

And, obviously, anyone who who has a world view they don't share can't be prophesying Truth, so they cannot be representatives of God.

So in their world there is only one thing to call it.

Call it narrow-minded, arrogant, bigoted, etc, etc, etc as much as you want and I will agree. But it is at least a consistent narrow-minded bigoted arrogance.

Cheers,
Ben
Post #26,222
by Ashton
1/28/02 11:54:21 PM
1/28/02 11:54:48 PM
Reply
New Either/or, black/white: one could call it er, 'digital' :-\ufffd
Expand Edited by Missing User 70 Jan. 28, 2002, 11:54:48 PM EST
Expand All History
     Harry Potter in print (no spoilers). - (static) - (44) - Jan. 23, 2002, 09:25:42 PM EST
         Thanks - fine review. - (Ashton) - (32) - Jan. 23, 2002, 10:17:30 PM EST
             Some things I forgot to mention. - (static) - (31) - Jan. 23, 2002, 11:50:08 PM EST
                 Never understood the proscription of 'magic'. - (Ashton) - (30) - Jan. 25, 2002, 06:58:20 PM EST
                     Re: Never understood the proscription of 'magic'. - (hnick) - (24) - Jan. 25, 2002, 08:19:04 PM EST
                         General Question (for all) - (Ashton) - (23) - Jan. 25, 2002, 10:02:22 PM EST
                             For me, reading was weirdly constructed - (wharris2) - (3) - Jan. 26, 2002, 01:41:35 AM EST
                                 Anyone remember those SRA reading comprehension modules? - (wharris2) - (2) - Jan. 26, 2002, 09:30:51 PM EST
                                     Yep, SRA. IBM owned them in the past... - (a6l6e6x) - Jan. 26, 2002, 09:38:30 PM EST
                                     Yep. - (admin) - Jan. 26, 2002, 09:38:52 PM EST
                             After some thought, no. - (hnick) - Jan. 26, 2002, 09:30:19 AM EST
                             No epiphany here. - (a6l6e6x) - Jan. 26, 2002, 11:22:55 AM EST
                             Could read in Kindergarten - (boxley) - Jan. 26, 2002, 08:44:40 PM EST
                             Nope, not really. -NT - (admin) - Jan. 26, 2002, 09:28:27 PM EST
                             I dunno, exactly. - (static) - Jan. 26, 2002, 11:28:00 PM EST
                             Second thought - (Ashton) - Jan. 27, 2002, 06:02:45 AM EST
                             Pretty much like Harris, can't remember when I couldn't. - (CRConrad) - (1) - Jan. 27, 2002, 10:04:18 AM EST
                                 Addendum - (wharris2) - Jan. 27, 2002, 07:19:33 PM EST
                             Can't remember that far back - (JayMehaffey) - Jan. 27, 2002, 08:51:50 PM EST
                             That was some day! - (Arkadiy) - (5) - Feb. 1, 2002, 04:20:27 PM EST
                                 Think I know - (Ashton) - (4) - Feb. 2, 2002, 05:10:20 AM EST
                                     Oops. :) - (Arkadiy) - (3) - Feb. 4, 2002, 05:04:08 PM EST
                                         Thanks! That helps me as well. - (a6l6e6x) - (1) - Feb. 4, 2002, 05:26:18 PM EST
                                             Obviously: = "Greasy"! -NT - (CRConrad) - Feb. 4, 2002, 06:56:20 PM EST
                                         Toosend tak - (Ashton) - Feb. 5, 2002, 08:59:35 AM EST
                             Earliest reading memory for me... - (Another Scott) - (1) - Feb. 1, 2002, 04:57:57 PM EST
                                 Looks as if it's just Arkadiy & moi who can - (Ashton) - Feb. 2, 2002, 05:27:16 AM EST
                             Can't remember when I couldn't - (drewk) - (1) - Feb. 5, 2002, 09:29:45 AM EST
                                 (wince) baby talking - (wharris2) - Feb. 5, 2002, 11:53:31 AM EST
                     Get inside their world view - (JayMehaffey) - (4) - Jan. 27, 2002, 09:06:11 PM EST
                         But even given that, there's no justification... - (CRConrad) - (3) - Jan. 28, 2002, 02:22:40 AM EST
                             Rah Rah CR! - (wharris2) - Jan. 28, 2002, 03:43:47 AM EST
                             Sorry, they are being consistent - (ben_tilly) - (1) - Jan. 28, 2002, 07:37:51 AM EST
                                 Either/or, black/white: one could call it er, 'digital' :-\ufffd -NT - (Ashton) - Jan. 28, 2002, 11:54:48 PM EST
         Sorry, but AFAICT Blyton totally sucks once you're past ~14. -NT - (CRConrad) - Jan. 24, 2002, 03:56:43 PM EST
         Addendum: I've now seen the movie! [spoiler warning] - (static) - (4) - Jan. 28, 2002, 06:06:17 AM EST
             Definitely agree re Malfoy - (Meerkat) - Jan. 28, 2002, 04:53:23 PM EST
             Contemporary/medieval? - (Arkadiy) - (2) - Feb. 1, 2002, 05:41:12 PM EST
                 I dunno. - (static) - (1) - Feb. 2, 2002, 12:01:59 AM EST
                     I guess it's all in the eyes of the beholder... - (Arkadiy) - Feb. 4, 2002, 05:13:10 PM EST
         Just finished #4. - (Ashton) - (4) - April 6, 2002, 12:56:42 AM EST
             I had to re-read my original post! - (static) - (3) - April 6, 2002, 01:15:19 AM EST
                 Magic research results:__ the empty set. - (Ashton) - (2) - April 6, 2002, 01:59:09 AM EST
                     Re: Despite the many pins... - (a6l6e6x) - (1) - April 6, 2002, 11:09:34 AM EST
                         When ya gots all the money - what's left 'sides procreation? - (Ashton) - April 6, 2002, 04:55:08 PM EST

This is leading up to dirtsnakes, I can tell...
67 ms