Anyone remember those SRA reading comprehension modules?

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #25,909 by wharris2 1/26/02 9:30:51 PM Reply	Anyone remember those SRA reading comprehension modules? I think it was SRA, not sure. Little plasticized things that had a story, then a questionaire at the end of it. "Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it." -- Donald Knuth
Post #25,910 by a6l6e6x 1/26/02 9:38:30 PM Reply	Yep, SRA. IBM owned them in the past... when i took a speed reading course in the 1960s. Looks like it's McGraw-Hill [link\|http://www.sra-4kids.com/\|now]. Alex Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do it from religious conviction. -- Blaise Pascal (1623-1662)
Post #25,911 by admin 1/26/02 9:38:52 PM Reply	Yep. I loved them, because I could go ahead at my own speed. Regards, -scott anderson "Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."

Harry Potter in print (no spoilers). - (static) - (44) - Jan. 23, 2002, 09:25:42 PM EST

Thanks - fine review. - (Ashton) - (32) - Jan. 23, 2002, 10:17:30 PM EST

Some things I forgot to mention. - (static) - (31) - Jan. 23, 2002, 11:50:08 PM EST

Never understood the proscription of 'magic'. - (Ashton) - (30) - Jan. 25, 2002, 06:58:20 PM EST

Re: Never understood the proscription of 'magic'. - (hnick) - (24) - Jan. 25, 2002, 08:19:04 PM EST

General Question (for all) - (Ashton) - (23) - Jan. 25, 2002, 10:02:22 PM EST

For me, reading was weirdly constructed - (wharris2) - (3) - Jan. 26, 2002, 01:41:35 AM EST

Anyone remember those SRA reading comprehension modules? - (wharris2) - (2) - Jan. 26, 2002, 09:30:51 PM EST

Yep, SRA. IBM owned them in the past... - (a6l6e6x) - Jan. 26, 2002, 09:38:30 PM EST

Yep. - (admin) - Jan. 26, 2002, 09:38:52 PM EST

After some thought, no. - (hnick) - Jan. 26, 2002, 09:30:19 AM EST

No epiphany here. - (a6l6e6x) - Jan. 26, 2002, 11:22:55 AM EST

Could read in Kindergarten - (boxley) - Jan. 26, 2002, 08:44:40 PM EST

Nope, not really. -NT - (admin) - Jan. 26, 2002, 09:28:27 PM EST

I dunno, exactly. - (static) - Jan. 26, 2002, 11:28:00 PM EST

Second thought - (Ashton) - Jan. 27, 2002, 06:02:45 AM EST

Pretty much like Harris, can't remember when I couldn't. - (CRConrad) - (1) - Jan. 27, 2002, 10:04:18 AM EST

Addendum - (wharris2) - Jan. 27, 2002, 07:19:33 PM EST

Can't remember that far back - (JayMehaffey) - Jan. 27, 2002, 08:51:50 PM EST

That was some day! - (Arkadiy) - (5) - Feb. 1, 2002, 04:20:27 PM EST

Think I know - (Ashton) - (4) - Feb. 2, 2002, 05:10:20 AM EST

Oops. :) - (Arkadiy) - (3) - Feb. 4, 2002, 05:04:08 PM EST

Thanks! That helps me as well. - (a6l6e6x) - (1) - Feb. 4, 2002, 05:26:18 PM EST

Obviously: = "Greasy"! -NT - (CRConrad) - Feb. 4, 2002, 06:56:20 PM EST

Toosend tak - (Ashton) - Feb. 5, 2002, 08:59:35 AM EST

Earliest reading memory for me... - (Another Scott) - (1) - Feb. 1, 2002, 04:57:57 PM EST

Looks as if it's just Arkadiy & moi who can - (Ashton) - Feb. 2, 2002, 05:27:16 AM EST

Can't remember when I couldn't - (drewk) - (1) - Feb. 5, 2002, 09:29:45 AM EST

(wince) baby talking - (wharris2) - Feb. 5, 2002, 11:53:31 AM EST

Get inside their world view - (JayMehaffey) - (4) - Jan. 27, 2002, 09:06:11 PM EST

But even given that, there's no justification... - (CRConrad) - (3) - Jan. 28, 2002, 02:22:40 AM EST

Rah Rah CR! - (wharris2) - Jan. 28, 2002, 03:43:47 AM EST

Sorry, they are being consistent - (ben_tilly) - (1) - Jan. 28, 2002, 07:37:51 AM EST

Either/or, black/white: one could call it er, 'digital' :-\ufffd -NT - (Ashton) - Jan. 28, 2002, 11:54:48 PM EST

Sorry, but AFAICT Blyton totally sucks once you're past ~14. -NT - (CRConrad) - Jan. 24, 2002, 03:56:43 PM EST

Addendum: I've now seen the movie! [spoiler warning] - (static) - (4) - Jan. 28, 2002, 06:06:17 AM EST

Definitely agree re Malfoy - (Meerkat) - Jan. 28, 2002, 04:53:23 PM EST

Contemporary/medieval? - (Arkadiy) - (2) - Feb. 1, 2002, 05:41:12 PM EST

I dunno. - (static) - (1) - Feb. 2, 2002, 12:01:59 AM EST

I guess it's all in the eyes of the beholder... - (Arkadiy) - Feb. 4, 2002, 05:13:10 PM EST

Just finished #4. - (Ashton) - (4) - April 6, 2002, 12:56:42 AM EST

I had to re-read my original post! - (static) - (3) - April 6, 2002, 01:15:19 AM EST

Magic research results:__ the empty set. - (Ashton) - (2) - April 6, 2002, 01:59:09 AM EST

Re: Despite the many pins... - (a6l6e6x) - (1) - April 6, 2002, 11:09:34 AM EST

When ya gots all the money - what's left 'sides procreation? - (Ashton) - April 6, 2002, 04:55:08 PM EST

iwethey.org

It's no good shouting out all of these random occurrences where you happen to see the face of the Virgin LRPD in a pancake in Guadalajara.
513 ms