IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New For me, reading was weirdly constructed
When I first entered first grade, I was in a school that was using an experimental phonics system. (This must have been circa 1968.) Phonics was taught, but with a special character set. Halfway through first grade, my parents moved and I was jolted into another school system in which my teacher took at look at my spelling test and probably internally said "OMG" but publically said "Let's give him some time". :=)

Nevermind the other experimental program I was in when I was in 4th grade, by that time I was placed in the 6th grade reading class.

Before then, at home, I was reading from Cat in the Hat and so forth, but I'm not sure if I was really reading, or if I was just memorizing the words from when my parents read it to me.

Hell, given that I don't remember much before I was 6 or 7 years old, I don't really remember any given time when I couldn't read. There really was no one brilliant defining moment in time that I can declare as to being able to read. As far as I can remember, I've been able to read all my life.

Whatever experimental programs I may have gone through, and I damn the 60's and the teacher's unions and whoever else decided to throw the dice with kids like me, I wish everyone could have my experience: not really knowing when they learned to read.
"Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it."
-- Donald Knuth
New Anyone remember those SRA reading comprehension modules?
I think it was SRA, not sure. Little plasticized things that had a story, then a questionaire at the end of it.
"Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it."
-- Donald Knuth
New Yep, SRA. IBM owned them in the past...
when i took a speed reading course in the 1960s.

Looks like it's McGraw-Hill [link|http://www.sra-4kids.com/|now].
Alex

Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do it from religious conviction. -- Blaise Pascal (1623-1662)
New Yep.
I loved them, because I could go ahead at my own speed.
Regards,

-scott anderson

"Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
     Harry Potter in print (no spoilers). - (static) - (44)
         Thanks - fine review. - (Ashton) - (32)
             Some things I forgot to mention. - (static) - (31)
                 Never understood the proscription of 'magic'. - (Ashton) - (30)
                     Re: Never understood the proscription of 'magic'. - (hnick) - (24)
                         General Question (for all) - (Ashton) - (23)
                             For me, reading was weirdly constructed - (wharris2) - (3)
                                 Anyone remember those SRA reading comprehension modules? - (wharris2) - (2)
                                     Yep, SRA. IBM owned them in the past... - (a6l6e6x)
                                     Yep. - (admin)
                             After some thought, no. - (hnick)
                             No epiphany here. - (a6l6e6x)
                             Could read in Kindergarten - (boxley)
                             Nope, not really. -NT - (admin)
                             I dunno, exactly. - (static)
                             Second thought - (Ashton)
                             Pretty much like Harris, can't remember when I couldn't. - (CRConrad) - (1)
                                 Addendum - (wharris2)
                             Can't remember that far back - (JayMehaffey)
                             That was some day! - (Arkadiy) - (5)
                                 Think I know - (Ashton) - (4)
                                     Oops. :) - (Arkadiy) - (3)
                                         Thanks! That helps me as well. - (a6l6e6x) - (1)
                                             Obviously: = "Greasy"! -NT - (CRConrad)
                                         Toosend tak - (Ashton)
                             Earliest reading memory for me... - (Another Scott) - (1)
                                 Looks as if it's just Arkadiy & moi who can - (Ashton)
                             Can't remember when I couldn't - (drewk) - (1)
                                 (wince) baby talking - (wharris2)
                     Get inside their world view - (JayMehaffey) - (4)
                         But even given that, there's no justification... - (CRConrad) - (3)
                             Rah Rah CR! - (wharris2)
                             Sorry, they are being consistent - (ben_tilly) - (1)
                                 Either/or, black/white: one could call it er, 'digital' :-\ufffd -NT - (Ashton)
         Sorry, but AFAICT Blyton totally sucks once you're past ~14. -NT - (CRConrad)
         Addendum: I've now seen the movie! [spoiler warning] - (static) - (4)
             Definitely agree re Malfoy - (Meerkat)
             Contemporary/medieval? - (Arkadiy) - (2)
                 I dunno. - (static) - (1)
                     I guess it's all in the eyes of the beholder... - (Arkadiy)
         Just finished #4. - (Ashton) - (4)
             I had to re-read my original post! - (static) - (3)
                 Magic research results:__ the empty set. - (Ashton) - (2)
                     Re: Despite the many pins... - (a6l6e6x) - (1)
                         When ya gots all the money - what's left 'sides procreation? - (Ashton)

I've got you in my hands.
88 ms