That sounds like the CYA clause

1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #228,399 by jake123 10/6/05 11:41:01 AM Reply	That sounds like the CYA clause you're going to use to avoid trouble with the wiff when she reads this. ;) --\n-------------------------------------------------------------------\n* Jack Troughton jake at consultron.ca \n [link\|http://consultron.ca\|http://consultron.ca] [link\|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca\|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca] \n Kingston Ontario Canada [link\|news://news.consultron.ca\|news://news.consultron.ca] *\n-------------------------------------------------------------------
Post #228,403 by drewk 10/6/05 11:48:12 AM Reply	She doesn't read this But yes, yes it is. Actually, though, everything I said is generally true IMO of most guys who haven't yet found a real romantic relationship. To me, one of the key indicators that yes, this one might be serious, is that you don't notice other women quite so much any more. Of course you still look, I mean that's what eyes are for innit? === Purveyor of Doc Hope's [link\|http://DocHope.com\|fresh-baked dog biscuits and pet treats]. [link\|http://DocHope.com\|http://DocHope.com]
Post #228,419 by folkert 10/6/05 12:57:25 PM Reply	No. Eyes are for ... gouging out when you get married. -- [link\|mailto:greg@gregfolkert.net\|greg], [link\|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry\|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] @ *i_wethey* SELECT * FROM scog WHERE ethics > 0;\n\n0 rows returned.

Questions- - (bionerd) - (56) - Oct. 5, 2005, 02:49:11 PM EDT

usually they hate me :-) - (boxley) - Oct. 5, 2005, 02:57:40 PM EDT

Men and Women can be friends. - (imric) - Oct. 5, 2005, 02:59:18 PM EDT

Of course men and women can be platonic friends - (Silverlock) - (11) - Oct. 5, 2005, 09:37:15 PM EDT

The two are distinct, though highly correlated - (ben_tilly) - Oct. 5, 2005, 10:49:04 PM EDT

Fantasies about grappling - (bionerd) - (9) - Oct. 6, 2005, 11:26:55 AM EDT

Did you really just ask that? - (drewk) - (1) - Oct. 6, 2005, 11:38:44 AM EDT

Yeah, at that standard - (jake123) - Oct. 6, 2005, 11:40:23 AM EDT

Still yes, IMO - (ben_tilly) - (2) - Oct. 6, 2005, 11:42:26 AM EDT

Well, romance is a social construct - (jake123) - (1) - Oct. 6, 2005, 11:47:48 AM EDT

Are you SURE? - (ben_tilly) - Oct. 7, 2005, 02:11:37 AM EDT

Not possible IMO - (Silverlock) - Oct. 6, 2005, 12:01:03 PM EDT

Only if one of them is asexual to start off with - (broomberg) - Oct. 6, 2005, 12:14:16 PM EDT

By definition . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - Oct. 6, 2005, 12:47:33 PM EDT

If the man is gay, yes. - (mmoffitt) - Oct. 6, 2005, 12:47:51 PM EDT

Looking at it the wrong way - (drewk) - Oct. 5, 2005, 03:15:00 PM EDT

Define Romantice Relationship - (jbrabeck) - Oct. 5, 2005, 04:05:17 PM EDT

Answers - (ben_tilly) - Oct. 5, 2005, 04:11:01 PM EDT

Re: Questions- - (Ashton) - Oct. 5, 2005, 04:12:03 PM EDT

Haven't you watched Harry Met Sally? - (bepatient) - Oct. 5, 2005, 05:01:59 PM EDT

Answers - (imqwerky) - Oct. 5, 2005, 06:02:56 PM EDT

Well, having done it 4 or 5 times - maybe more . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - Oct. 5, 2005, 07:12:04 PM EDT

Here's one opinion - (Nightowl) - Oct. 5, 2005, 11:25:59 PM EDT

It's hard to divide affections. - (Another Scott) - (3) - Oct. 5, 2005, 10:31:50 PM EDT

Harold did Maude - (imqwerky) - (2) - Oct. 5, 2005, 10:36:06 PM EDT

I've not seen the movie in its entirety. It's on The List. -NT - (Another Scott) - (1) - Oct. 5, 2005, 10:38:27 PM EDT

It's a great flick. - (imqwerky) - Oct. 5, 2005, 10:48:47 PM EDT

Thanks for the feedback - (bionerd) - (27) - Oct. 6, 2005, 09:13:22 AM EDT

I don't think it does have such power - (drewk) - Oct. 6, 2005, 09:38:24 AM EDT

I'll disagree with Drew - (ben_tilly) - (4) - Oct. 6, 2005, 10:45:59 AM EDT

Remember, I prefaced everything with "when I was single" - (drewk) - (3) - Oct. 6, 2005, 11:40:09 AM EDT

That sounds like the CYA clause - (jake123) - (2) - Oct. 6, 2005, 11:41:01 AM EDT

She doesn't read this - (drewk) - (1) - Oct. 6, 2005, 11:48:12 AM EDT

No. Eyes are for ... - (folkert) - Oct. 6, 2005, 12:57:25 PM EDT

Another thought - (drewk) - (19) - Oct. 6, 2005, 01:52:52 PM EDT

As long as we're on gross generalizations . . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (7) - Oct. 6, 2005, 02:12:17 PM EDT

Want honesty? Check out the Russian Bride sites - (drewk) - (3) - Oct. 6, 2005, 02:27:59 PM EDT

Oh, when they say "generous" I assume they mean FAT -NT - (tuberculosis) - Oct. 6, 2005, 02:30:24 PM EDT

Havn't checked out any sites, but . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (1) - Oct. 6, 2005, 03:08:51 PM EDT

Go for that one - (drewk) - Oct. 6, 2005, 03:23:23 PM EDT

I cant dispute your experiences - (bionerd) - (1) - Oct. 6, 2005, 02:55:13 PM EDT

Actually, my experiences aren't like that . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - Oct. 6, 2005, 03:23:06 PM EDT

Nicole's personal ad must be like that. - (Another Scott) - Oct. 6, 2005, 11:06:32 PM EDT

The "girls" are a bunch of therapists - (bionerd) - (10) - Oct. 6, 2005, 02:52:23 PM EDT

So why do you expect to find a man who *doesn't* notice? -NT - (drewk) - (5) - Oct. 6, 2005, 03:23:50 PM EDT

I dont. - (bionerd) - (4) - Oct. 6, 2005, 03:46:00 PM EDT

Okay, maybe you don't want it - (drewk) - (3) - Oct. 6, 2005, 04:16:48 PM EDT

No it doesnt - (bionerd) - (2) - Oct. 6, 2005, 04:19:48 PM EDT

You obviously don't understand DrewK's role here. - (folkert) - Oct. 6, 2005, 04:21:49 PM EDT

No... no, that is definitely Drew's job. - (admin) - Oct. 6, 2005, 04:26:38 PM EDT

So then eyes, etc, ARE the "naughty bits" for your gang. -NT - (CRConrad) - (1) - Oct. 6, 2005, 04:24:25 PM EDT

The voice, don't forget the voice! - (imqwerky) - Oct. 6, 2005, 04:30:59 PM EDT

stealth sex - (boxley) - (1) - Oct. 6, 2005, 06:36:32 PM EDT

Diet Coke through the nose! -NT - (mmoffitt) - Oct. 7, 2005, 12:34:22 PM EDT

Here's my take - (Nightowl) - Oct. 6, 2005, 03:09:31 PM EDT

Re: Questions- - (ubernostrum) - (1) - Oct. 7, 2005, 01:21:50 AM EDT

So, did he pass the test? -NT - (broomberg) - Oct. 7, 2005, 06:31:45 AM EDT

iwethey.org

Dude, down the hall and to the left. That’s who you want.
71 ms