IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Flame Quarantine Forum / I*DON'T*CLRPD
Post #196,406
by drewk
Picture of drewk
2/26/05 9:56:43 AM
Reply
New I*DON'T*CLRPD
Come on, Bill. Has anyone ever tried more blatantly for a lrpdism?
===

Purveyor of Doc Hope's [link|http://DocHope.com|fresh-baked dog biscuits and pet treats].
[link|http://DocHope.com|http://DocHope.com]
Post #196,408
by folkert
Picture of folkert
2/26/05 10:15:55 AM
Reply
New Yes, I've done^H^H^H^Hseen many attempts.
--
[link|mailto:greg@gregfolkert.net|greg],
[link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry|REMEMBER ED CURRY!] @ iwethey

[link|http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=134485&cid=11233230|"Microsoft Security" is an even better oxymoron than "Military Intelligence"]
No matter how much Microsoft supporters whine about how Linux and other operating systems have just as many bugs as their operating systems do, the bottom line is that the serious, gut-wrenching problems happen on Windows, not on Linux, not on Mac OS. -- [link|http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1622086,00.asp|source]
     I Call Fscking B.S. - (mmoffitt) - (69) - Feb. 22, 2005, 08:06:26 PM EST
         I'm not a literalist - (ben_tilly) - (37) - Feb. 22, 2005, 08:28:49 PM EST
             Hey hoser, you forget which forum you're in, eh? - (Another Scott) - (3) - Feb. 22, 2005, 08:38:47 PM EST
                 *chuckle* - (mmoffitt) - (2) - Feb. 23, 2005, 09:20:00 AM EST
                     We can all chip in for this... - (Another Scott) - (1) - Feb. 23, 2005, 09:36:16 AM EST
                         Ya know. - (mmoffitt) - Feb. 23, 2005, 11:46:19 AM EST
             Feh. - (mmoffitt) - (32) - Feb. 23, 2005, 08:39:27 AM EST
                 You're wrong about Scalia - (ben_tilly) - (31) - Feb. 23, 2005, 10:40:28 AM EST
                     Wrong on so many levels. - (mmoffitt) - (30) - Feb. 23, 2005, 11:39:32 AM EST
                         But they are NOT legislators, as defined. - (bepatient) - (1) - Feb. 23, 2005, 11:49:29 AM EST
                             Huh? - (mmoffitt) - Feb. 23, 2005, 11:52:15 AM EST
                         Yes, you are indeed - (ben_tilly) - (27) - Feb. 23, 2005, 01:52:37 PM EST
                             Judges can be impeached and removed. It's rare though. -NT - (Another Scott) - Feb. 23, 2005, 01:57:28 PM EST
                             Edited for clarity. - (mmoffitt) - (25) - Feb. 23, 2005, 02:07:36 PM EST
                                 You're talking past each other. - (admin) - (24) - Feb. 23, 2005, 02:17:33 PM EST
                                     Oh, I understood what Mike said perfectly well - (ben_tilly) - (23) - Feb. 23, 2005, 02:33:28 PM EST
                                         I was being tactful... - (admin) - (7) - Feb. 23, 2005, 02:36:01 PM EST
                                             flees of 1000 camels and all that -NT - (bepatient) - (6) - Feb. 23, 2005, 02:38:35 PM EST
                                                 "Flees" or "Fleas"? - (jb4) - (5) - Feb. 25, 2005, 06:54:58 PM EST
                                                     Oooh. Spelling flame. That's a good one. -NT - (Another Scott) - Feb. 25, 2005, 07:14:01 PM EST
                                                     Yabut... - (admin) - (3) - Feb. 25, 2005, 07:24:46 PM EST
                                                         Ouch - (bepatient) - (2) - Feb. 26, 2005, 07:16:49 AM EST
                                                             I*DON'T*CLRPD - (drewk) - (1) - Feb. 26, 2005, 09:56:43 AM EST
                                                                 Yes, I've done^H^H^H^Hseen many attempts. -NT - (folkert) - Feb. 26, 2005, 10:15:55 AM EST
                                         Hey, if you can't be loose w/an argument here, - (mmoffitt) - (14) - Feb. 24, 2005, 04:59:06 PM EST
                                             You mean you're claiming a right to idiocy? - (ben_tilly) - (13) - Feb. 24, 2005, 06:10:04 PM EST
                                                 Have you read any lower court opinions lately? - (drewk) - (3) - Feb. 24, 2005, 06:32:59 PM EST
                                                     I've liked the SCO opinions so far :-) - (ben_tilly) - (2) - Feb. 24, 2005, 06:35:40 PM EST
                                                         How about this one - (drewk) - (1) - Feb. 24, 2005, 08:35:52 PM EST
                                                             Point but... - (ben_tilly) - Feb. 24, 2005, 09:09:36 PM EST
                                                 what do you call the lawyer that graduates in the bottom of - (boxley) - (1) - Feb. 24, 2005, 10:20:28 PM EST
                                                     Same deal with physicians. And that's DEADLY. -NT - (mmoffitt) - Feb. 25, 2005, 11:01:38 AM EST
                                                 Well, what can I say? - (mmoffitt) - (5) - Feb. 25, 2005, 11:04:03 AM EST
                                                     My point was pretty simple - (ben_tilly) - (3) - Feb. 25, 2005, 11:42:10 AM EST
                                                         Civility has returned - at last. - (mmoffitt) - (2) - Feb. 25, 2005, 12:05:21 PM EST
                                                             I unexpectedly reached my first condition for stopping - (ben_tilly) - (1) - Feb. 25, 2005, 12:08:38 PM EST
                                                                 :-) -NT - (mmoffitt) - Feb. 25, 2005, 01:38:32 PM EST
                                                     The job of legislation was reserved for - (Arkadiy) - Feb. 25, 2005, 11:57:14 AM EST
                                                 On point 1, I meant in "Flame" not in general. -NT - (mmoffitt) - Feb. 25, 2005, 07:28:19 PM EST
         Formula is still good - (tuberculosis) - Feb. 22, 2005, 08:45:39 PM EST
         Well now - (bepatient) - (28) - Feb. 22, 2005, 08:51:55 PM EST
             Because obviously - (ben_tilly) - (27) - Feb. 22, 2005, 09:24:38 PM EST
                 Obvious to some - (bepatient) - (26) - Feb. 22, 2005, 10:42:55 PM EST
                     I didn't think you could defend your position. Thanks. -NT - (mmoffitt) - (25) - Feb. 23, 2005, 09:15:03 AM EST
                         Defend against what? - (bepatient) - (24) - Feb. 23, 2005, 11:47:34 AM EST
                             The position that you said you had. - (mmoffitt) - (23) - Feb. 23, 2005, 11:49:03 AM EST
                                 You may want to re-read the thread then. - (bepatient) - (22) - Feb. 23, 2005, 12:13:24 PM EST
                                     Will you quit baiting me, I'm compulsive. - (mmoffitt) - (1) - Feb. 23, 2005, 01:26:01 PM EST
                                         chuckle - (bepatient) - Feb. 23, 2005, 02:32:45 PM EST
                                     Re: You may want to re-read the [code] then. - (Ashton) - (19) - Feb. 24, 2005, 06:03:24 AM EST
                                         And that 'code word' was? - (imric) - (18) - Feb. 24, 2005, 06:58:55 AM EST
                                             ICLRPD :-) (new thread) - (bepatient) - Feb. 24, 2005, 08:51:28 AM EST
                                             I do so love stories from True Believers in 'theories'. - (Ashton) - (16) - Feb. 25, 2005, 05:54:59 AM EST
                                                 Since you are 'chickening' out from this thread - (imric) - (11) - Feb. 25, 2005, 07:28:10 AM EST
                                                     He's got a point. As do you. - (Another Scott) - (7) - Feb. 25, 2005, 08:04:17 AM EST
                                                         Oh hell no, you don't believe that do you? - (mmoffitt) - (4) - Feb. 25, 2005, 07:18:30 PM EST
                                                             But of course YOU would. - (imric) - (1) - Feb. 25, 2005, 07:42:28 PM EST
                                                                 Yes, I'd rather have Breyer making law than Souder (R) IN. - (mmoffitt) - Feb. 26, 2005, 07:23:08 PM EST
                                                             You're a fan of Roy Moore then? - (Another Scott) - (1) - Feb. 25, 2005, 07:51:59 PM EST
                                                                 It all depends. - (mmoffitt) - Feb. 26, 2005, 07:21:06 PM EST
                                                         Very good post, you fucking moron... - (CRConrad) - (1) - Feb. 28, 2005, 06:03:46 AM EST
                                                             That's a problem with this forum. (new thread) - (Another Scott) - Feb. 28, 2005, 07:59:43 AM EST
                                                     Received with appropriate satisfiction.. - (Ashton) - (2) - March 1, 2005, 02:35:53 AM EST
                                                         I get it now - (bepatient) - March 1, 2005, 06:36:00 AM EST
                                                         Bah. You are an idiot. - (imric) - March 1, 2005, 07:19:17 AM EST
                                                 My goodness, Ashey, stop pussy footing around... - (danreck) - (3) - Feb. 25, 2005, 04:53:20 PM EST
                                                     Fucking Reillusionment. What a concept - - (Ashton) - (2) - March 1, 2005, 03:27:22 AM EST
                                                         Waiting for Daylight... - (screamer) - (1) - March 2, 2005, 02:11:48 PM EST
                                                             Hey.. I know_____Who. Knows. - (Ashton) - March 3, 2005, 01:14:46 AM EST
         YOU ARE ALL FUCKING IDIOTS AND ME > YOU (new thread) - (pwhysall) - March 1, 2005, 07:36:48 AM EST

Return the relics to the elephants, and Atlantis rises.
86 ms