Have you read any lower court opinions lately?

1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #196,250 by drewk 2/24/05 6:32:59 PM Reply	Have you read any lower court opinions lately? Considering some of the crap that makes the news, I can only wonder at what the rest of it looks like. === Purveyor of Doc Hope's [link\|http://DocHope.com\|fresh-baked dog biscuits and pet treats]. [link\|http://DocHope.com\|http://DocHope.com]
Post #196,251 by ben_tilly 2/24/05 6:35:40 PM Reply	I've liked the SCO opinions so far :-) That's a lower court. Cheers, Ben I have come to believe that idealism without discipline is a quick road to disaster, while discipline without idealism is pointless. -- Aaron Ward (my brother)
Post #196,266 by drewk 2/24/05 8:35:52 PM Reply	How about this one [link\|/forums/render/content/show?contentid=196262\|Post #196262] Tell me one literate person who's not a judge or lawyer who would use the word "donee" instead of "recipient". === Purveyor of Doc Hope's [link\|http://DocHope.com\|fresh-baked dog biscuits and pet treats]. [link\|http://DocHope.com\|http://DocHope.com]
Post #196,272 by ben_tilly 2/24/05 9:09:36 PM Reply	Point but... All present understand what he meant when he said it. How many in the general public would be scratching their heads over whether "donee" was really a word? Cheers, Ben I have come to believe that idealism without discipline is a quick road to disaster, while discipline without idealism is pointless. -- Aaron Ward (my brother)

I Call Fscking B.S. - (mmoffitt) - (69) - Feb. 22, 2005, 08:06:26 PM EST

I'm not a literalist - (ben_tilly) - (37) - Feb. 22, 2005, 08:28:49 PM EST

Hey hoser, you forget which forum you're in, eh? - (Another Scott) - (3) - Feb. 22, 2005, 08:38:47 PM EST

*chuckle* - (mmoffitt) - (2) - Feb. 23, 2005, 09:20:00 AM EST

We can all chip in for this... - (Another Scott) - (1) - Feb. 23, 2005, 09:36:16 AM EST

Ya know. - (mmoffitt) - Feb. 23, 2005, 11:46:19 AM EST

Feh. - (mmoffitt) - (32) - Feb. 23, 2005, 08:39:27 AM EST

You're wrong about Scalia - (ben_tilly) - (31) - Feb. 23, 2005, 10:40:28 AM EST

Wrong on so many levels. - (mmoffitt) - (30) - Feb. 23, 2005, 11:39:32 AM EST

But they are NOT legislators, as defined. - (bepatient) - (1) - Feb. 23, 2005, 11:49:29 AM EST

Huh? - (mmoffitt) - Feb. 23, 2005, 11:52:15 AM EST

Yes, you are indeed - (ben_tilly) - (27) - Feb. 23, 2005, 01:52:37 PM EST

Judges can be impeached and removed. It's rare though. -NT - (Another Scott) - Feb. 23, 2005, 01:57:28 PM EST

Edited for clarity. - (mmoffitt) - (25) - Feb. 23, 2005, 02:07:36 PM EST

You're talking past each other. - (admin) - (24) - Feb. 23, 2005, 02:17:33 PM EST

Oh, I understood what Mike said perfectly well - (ben_tilly) - (23) - Feb. 23, 2005, 02:33:28 PM EST

I was being tactful... - (admin) - (7) - Feb. 23, 2005, 02:36:01 PM EST

flees of 1000 camels and all that -NT - (bepatient) - (6) - Feb. 23, 2005, 02:38:35 PM EST

"Flees" or "Fleas"? - (jb4) - (5) - Feb. 25, 2005, 06:54:58 PM EST

Oooh. Spelling flame. That's a good one. -NT - (Another Scott) - Feb. 25, 2005, 07:14:01 PM EST

Yabut... - (admin) - (3) - Feb. 25, 2005, 07:24:46 PM EST

Ouch - (bepatient) - (2) - Feb. 26, 2005, 07:16:49 AM EST

I*DON'T*CLRPD - (drewk) - (1) - Feb. 26, 2005, 09:56:43 AM EST

Yes, I've done^H^H^H^Hseen many attempts. -NT - (folkert) - Feb. 26, 2005, 10:15:55 AM EST

Hey, if you can't be loose w/an argument here, - (mmoffitt) - (14) - Feb. 24, 2005, 04:59:06 PM EST

You mean you're claiming a right to idiocy? - (ben_tilly) - (13) - Feb. 24, 2005, 06:10:04 PM EST

Have you read any lower court opinions lately? - (drewk) - (3) - Feb. 24, 2005, 06:32:59 PM EST

I've liked the SCO opinions so far :-) - (ben_tilly) - (2) - Feb. 24, 2005, 06:35:40 PM EST

How about this one - (drewk) - (1) - Feb. 24, 2005, 08:35:52 PM EST

Point but... - (ben_tilly) - Feb. 24, 2005, 09:09:36 PM EST

what do you call the lawyer that graduates in the bottom of - (boxley) - (1) - Feb. 24, 2005, 10:20:28 PM EST

Same deal with physicians. And that's DEADLY. -NT - (mmoffitt) - Feb. 25, 2005, 11:01:38 AM EST

Well, what can I say? - (mmoffitt) - (5) - Feb. 25, 2005, 11:04:03 AM EST

My point was pretty simple - (ben_tilly) - (3) - Feb. 25, 2005, 11:42:10 AM EST

Civility has returned - at last. - (mmoffitt) - (2) - Feb. 25, 2005, 12:05:21 PM EST

I unexpectedly reached my first condition for stopping - (ben_tilly) - (1) - Feb. 25, 2005, 12:08:38 PM EST

:-) -NT - (mmoffitt) - Feb. 25, 2005, 01:38:32 PM EST

The job of legislation was reserved for - (Arkadiy) - Feb. 25, 2005, 11:57:14 AM EST

On point 1, I meant in "Flame" not in general. -NT - (mmoffitt) - Feb. 25, 2005, 07:28:19 PM EST

Formula is still good - (tuberculosis) - Feb. 22, 2005, 08:45:39 PM EST

Well now - (bepatient) - (28) - Feb. 22, 2005, 08:51:55 PM EST

Because obviously - (ben_tilly) - (27) - Feb. 22, 2005, 09:24:38 PM EST

Obvious to some - (bepatient) - (26) - Feb. 22, 2005, 10:42:55 PM EST

I didn't think you could defend your position. Thanks. -NT - (mmoffitt) - (25) - Feb. 23, 2005, 09:15:03 AM EST

Defend against what? - (bepatient) - (24) - Feb. 23, 2005, 11:47:34 AM EST

The position that you said you had. - (mmoffitt) - (23) - Feb. 23, 2005, 11:49:03 AM EST

You may want to re-read the thread then. - (bepatient) - (22) - Feb. 23, 2005, 12:13:24 PM EST

Will you quit baiting me, I'm compulsive. - (mmoffitt) - (1) - Feb. 23, 2005, 01:26:01 PM EST

chuckle - (bepatient) - Feb. 23, 2005, 02:32:45 PM EST

Re: You may want to re-read the [code] then. - (Ashton) - (19) - Feb. 24, 2005, 06:03:24 AM EST

And that 'code word' was? - (imric) - (18) - Feb. 24, 2005, 06:58:55 AM EST

ICLRPD :-) (new thread) - (bepatient) - Feb. 24, 2005, 08:51:28 AM EST

I do so love stories from True Believers in 'theories'. - (Ashton) - (16) - Feb. 25, 2005, 05:54:59 AM EST

Since you are 'chickening' out from this thread - (imric) - (11) - Feb. 25, 2005, 07:28:10 AM EST

He's got a point. As do you. - (Another Scott) - (7) - Feb. 25, 2005, 08:04:17 AM EST

Oh hell no, you don't believe that do you? - (mmoffitt) - (4) - Feb. 25, 2005, 07:18:30 PM EST

But of course YOU would. - (imric) - (1) - Feb. 25, 2005, 07:42:28 PM EST

Yes, I'd rather have Breyer making law than Souder (R) IN. - (mmoffitt) - Feb. 26, 2005, 07:23:08 PM EST

You're a fan of Roy Moore then? - (Another Scott) - (1) - Feb. 25, 2005, 07:51:59 PM EST

It all depends. - (mmoffitt) - Feb. 26, 2005, 07:21:06 PM EST

Very good post, you fucking moron... - (CRConrad) - (1) - Feb. 28, 2005, 06:03:46 AM EST

That's a problem with this forum. (new thread) - (Another Scott) - Feb. 28, 2005, 07:59:43 AM EST

Received with appropriate satisfiction.. - (Ashton) - (2) - March 1, 2005, 02:35:53 AM EST

I get it now - (bepatient) - March 1, 2005, 06:36:00 AM EST

Bah. You are an idiot. - (imric) - March 1, 2005, 07:19:17 AM EST

My goodness, Ashey, stop pussy footing around... - (danreck) - (3) - Feb. 25, 2005, 04:53:20 PM EST

Fucking Reillusionment. What a concept - - (Ashton) - (2) - March 1, 2005, 03:27:22 AM EST

Waiting for Daylight... - (screamer) - (1) - March 2, 2005, 02:11:48 PM EST

Hey.. I know_____Who. Knows. - (Ashton) - March 3, 2005, 01:14:46 AM EST

YOU ARE ALL FUCKING IDIOTS AND ME > YOU (new thread) - (pwhysall) - March 1, 2005, 07:36:48 AM EST

iwethey.org

Coffee, tea, or me?
79 ms