Do the following words sound familiar to you?
This is the most fundadmental of his [Scalia's] and my "strict" readers of the Constitution..
Pint. Set. Match.
(And yes, Pint was intentional ;0)
I Call Fscking B.S.
- (mmoffitt)
- (69)
- Feb. 22, 2005, 08:06:26 PM EST
I'm not a literalist
- (ben_tilly)
- (37)
- Feb. 22, 2005, 08:28:49 PM EST
Hey hoser, you forget which forum you're in, eh?
- (Another Scott)
- (3)
- Feb. 22, 2005, 08:38:47 PM EST
*chuckle*
- (mmoffitt)
- (2)
- Feb. 23, 2005, 09:20:00 AM EST
We can all chip in for this...
- (Another Scott)
- (1)
- Feb. 23, 2005, 09:36:16 AM EST
Ya know.
- (mmoffitt)
- Feb. 23, 2005, 11:46:19 AM EST
Feh.
- (mmoffitt)
- (32)
- Feb. 23, 2005, 08:39:27 AM EST
You're wrong about Scalia
- (ben_tilly)
- (31)
- Feb. 23, 2005, 10:40:28 AM EST
Wrong on so many levels.
- (mmoffitt)
- (30)
- Feb. 23, 2005, 11:39:32 AM EST
But they are NOT legislators, as defined.
- (bepatient)
- (1)
- Feb. 23, 2005, 11:49:29 AM EST
Huh?
- (mmoffitt)
- Feb. 23, 2005, 11:52:15 AM EST
Yes, you are indeed
- (ben_tilly)
- (27)
- Feb. 23, 2005, 01:52:37 PM EST
Judges can be impeached and removed. It's rare though.
-NT
- (Another Scott)
- Feb. 23, 2005, 01:57:28 PM EST
Edited for clarity.
- (mmoffitt)
- (25)
- Feb. 23, 2005, 02:07:36 PM EST
You're talking past each other.
- (admin)
- (24)
- Feb. 23, 2005, 02:17:33 PM EST
Oh, I understood what Mike said perfectly well
- (ben_tilly)
- (23)
- Feb. 23, 2005, 02:33:28 PM EST
I was being tactful...
- (admin)
- (7)
- Feb. 23, 2005, 02:36:01 PM EST
flees of 1000 camels and all that
-NT
- (bepatient)
- (6)
- Feb. 23, 2005, 02:38:35 PM EST
"Flees" or "Fleas"?
- (jb4)
- (5)
- Feb. 25, 2005, 06:54:58 PM EST
Oooh. Spelling flame. That's a good one.
-NT
- (Another Scott)
- Feb. 25, 2005, 07:14:01 PM EST
Yabut...
- (admin)
- (3)
- Feb. 25, 2005, 07:24:46 PM EST
Ouch
- (bepatient)
- (2)
- Feb. 26, 2005, 07:16:49 AM EST
I*DON'T*CLRPD
- (drewk)
- (1)
- Feb. 26, 2005, 09:56:43 AM EST
Yes, I've done^H^H^H^Hseen many attempts.
-NT
- (folkert)
- Feb. 26, 2005, 10:15:55 AM EST
Hey, if you can't be loose w/an argument here,
- (mmoffitt)
- (14)
- Feb. 24, 2005, 04:59:06 PM EST
You mean you're claiming a right to idiocy?
- (ben_tilly)
- (13)
- Feb. 24, 2005, 06:10:04 PM EST
Have you read any lower court opinions lately?
- (drewk)
- (3)
- Feb. 24, 2005, 06:32:59 PM EST
I've liked the SCO opinions so far :-)
- (ben_tilly)
- (2)
- Feb. 24, 2005, 06:35:40 PM EST
How about this one
- (drewk)
- (1)
- Feb. 24, 2005, 08:35:52 PM EST
Point but...
- (ben_tilly)
- Feb. 24, 2005, 09:09:36 PM EST
what do you call the lawyer that graduates in the bottom of
- (boxley)
- (1)
- Feb. 24, 2005, 10:20:28 PM EST
Same deal with physicians. And that's DEADLY.
-NT
- (mmoffitt)
- Feb. 25, 2005, 11:01:38 AM EST
Well, what can I say?
- (mmoffitt)
- (5)
- Feb. 25, 2005, 11:04:03 AM EST
My point was pretty simple
- (ben_tilly)
- (3)
- Feb. 25, 2005, 11:42:10 AM EST
Civility has returned - at last.
- (mmoffitt)
- (2)
- Feb. 25, 2005, 12:05:21 PM EST
I unexpectedly reached my first condition for stopping
- (ben_tilly)
- (1)
- Feb. 25, 2005, 12:08:38 PM EST
:-)
-NT
- (mmoffitt)
- Feb. 25, 2005, 01:38:32 PM EST
The job of legislation was reserved for
- (Arkadiy)
- Feb. 25, 2005, 11:57:14 AM EST
On point 1, I meant in "Flame" not in general.
-NT
- (mmoffitt)
- Feb. 25, 2005, 07:28:19 PM EST
Formula is still good
- (tuberculosis)
- Feb. 22, 2005, 08:45:39 PM EST
Well now
- (bepatient)
- (28)
- Feb. 22, 2005, 08:51:55 PM EST
Because obviously
- (ben_tilly)
- (27)
- Feb. 22, 2005, 09:24:38 PM EST
Obvious to some
- (bepatient)
- (26)
- Feb. 22, 2005, 10:42:55 PM EST
I didn't think you could defend your position. Thanks.
-NT
- (mmoffitt)
- (25)
- Feb. 23, 2005, 09:15:03 AM EST
Defend against what?
- (bepatient)
- (24)
- Feb. 23, 2005, 11:47:34 AM EST
The position that you said you had.
- (mmoffitt)
- (23)
- Feb. 23, 2005, 11:49:03 AM EST
You may want to re-read the thread then.
- (bepatient)
- (22)
- Feb. 23, 2005, 12:13:24 PM EST
Will you quit baiting me, I'm compulsive.
- (mmoffitt)
- (1)
- Feb. 23, 2005, 01:26:01 PM EST
chuckle
- (bepatient)
- Feb. 23, 2005, 02:32:45 PM EST
Re: You may want to re-read the [code] then.
- (Ashton)
- (19)
- Feb. 24, 2005, 06:03:24 AM EST
And that 'code word' was?
- (imric)
- (18)
- Feb. 24, 2005, 06:58:55 AM EST
ICLRPD :-) (new thread)
- (bepatient)
- Feb. 24, 2005, 08:51:28 AM EST
I do so love stories from True Believers in 'theories'.
- (Ashton)
- (16)
- Feb. 25, 2005, 05:54:59 AM EST
Since you are 'chickening' out from this thread
- (imric)
- (11)
- Feb. 25, 2005, 07:28:10 AM EST
He's got a point. As do you.
- (Another Scott)
- (7)
- Feb. 25, 2005, 08:04:17 AM EST
Oh hell no, you don't believe that do you?
- (mmoffitt)
- (4)
- Feb. 25, 2005, 07:18:30 PM EST
But of course YOU would.
- (imric)
- (1)
- Feb. 25, 2005, 07:42:28 PM EST
Yes, I'd rather have Breyer making law than Souder (R) IN.
- (mmoffitt)
- Feb. 26, 2005, 07:23:08 PM EST
You're a fan of Roy Moore then?
- (Another Scott)
- (1)
- Feb. 25, 2005, 07:51:59 PM EST
It all depends.
- (mmoffitt)
- Feb. 26, 2005, 07:21:06 PM EST
Very good post, you fucking moron...
- (CRConrad)
- (1)
- Feb. 28, 2005, 06:03:46 AM EST
That's a problem with this forum. (new thread)
- (Another Scott)
- Feb. 28, 2005, 07:59:43 AM EST
Received with appropriate satisfiction..
- (Ashton)
- (2)
- March 1, 2005, 02:35:53 AM EST
I get it now
- (bepatient)
- March 1, 2005, 06:36:00 AM EST
Bah. You are an idiot.
- (imric)
- March 1, 2005, 07:19:17 AM EST
My goodness, Ashey, stop pussy footing around...
- (danreck)
- (3)
- Feb. 25, 2005, 04:53:20 PM EST
Fucking Reillusionment. What a concept -
- (Ashton)
- (2)
- March 1, 2005, 03:27:22 AM EST
Waiting for Daylight...
- (screamer)
- (1)
- March 2, 2005, 02:11:48 PM EST
Hey.. I know_____Who. Knows.
- (Ashton)
- March 3, 2005, 01:14:46 AM EST
YOU ARE ALL FUCKING IDIOTS AND ME > YOU (new thread)
- (pwhysall)
- March 1, 2005, 07:36:48 AM EST
