But of course YOU would.

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #196,376

by imric

2/25/05 7:42:28 PM

But of course YOU would.

You are an enemy of democracy. You stated opinion is that you would rather have an 'elite' cabal rule.

As long as YOU are a member of that cabal, of course. You are an enemy of freedom.

Period.

[link|http://forfree.sytes.net|

]

Imric's Tips for Living

Paranoia Is a Survival Trait
Pessimists are never disappointed - but sometimes, if they are very lucky, they can be pleasantly surprised...
Even though everyone is out to get you, it doesn't matter unless you let them win.

Nothing is as simple as it seems in the beginning,
As hopeless as it seems in the middle,
Or as finished as it seems in the end.

Post #196,442

by mmoffitt

2/26/05 7:23:08 PM

Yes, I'd rather have Breyer making law than Souder (R) IN.

And I'd be careful, if I were you, supporting having Souder write your laws for you.

bcnu,
Mikem

Eine Leute. Eine Welt. Ein F\ufffdhrer.
God Bless America.

I Call Fscking B.S. - (mmoffitt) - (69) - Feb. 22, 2005, 08:06:26 PM EST

I'm not a literalist - (ben_tilly) - (37) - Feb. 22, 2005, 08:28:49 PM EST

Hey hoser, you forget which forum you're in, eh? - (Another Scott) - (3) - Feb. 22, 2005, 08:38:47 PM EST

*chuckle* - (mmoffitt) - (2) - Feb. 23, 2005, 09:20:00 AM EST

We can all chip in for this... - (Another Scott) - (1) - Feb. 23, 2005, 09:36:16 AM EST

Ya know. - (mmoffitt) - Feb. 23, 2005, 11:46:19 AM EST

Feh. - (mmoffitt) - (32) - Feb. 23, 2005, 08:39:27 AM EST

You're wrong about Scalia - (ben_tilly) - (31) - Feb. 23, 2005, 10:40:28 AM EST

Wrong on so many levels. - (mmoffitt) - (30) - Feb. 23, 2005, 11:39:32 AM EST

But they are NOT legislators, as defined. - (bepatient) - (1) - Feb. 23, 2005, 11:49:29 AM EST

Huh? - (mmoffitt) - Feb. 23, 2005, 11:52:15 AM EST

Yes, you are indeed - (ben_tilly) - (27) - Feb. 23, 2005, 01:52:37 PM EST

Judges can be impeached and removed. It's rare though. -NT - (Another Scott) - Feb. 23, 2005, 01:57:28 PM EST

Edited for clarity. - (mmoffitt) - (25) - Feb. 23, 2005, 02:07:36 PM EST

You're talking past each other. - (admin) - (24) - Feb. 23, 2005, 02:17:33 PM EST

Oh, I understood what Mike said perfectly well - (ben_tilly) - (23) - Feb. 23, 2005, 02:33:28 PM EST

I was being tactful... - (admin) - (7) - Feb. 23, 2005, 02:36:01 PM EST

flees of 1000 camels and all that -NT - (bepatient) - (6) - Feb. 23, 2005, 02:38:35 PM EST

"Flees" or "Fleas"? - (jb4) - (5) - Feb. 25, 2005, 06:54:58 PM EST

Oooh. Spelling flame. That's a good one. -NT - (Another Scott) - Feb. 25, 2005, 07:14:01 PM EST

Yabut... - (admin) - (3) - Feb. 25, 2005, 07:24:46 PM EST

Ouch - (bepatient) - (2) - Feb. 26, 2005, 07:16:49 AM EST

I*DON'T*CLRPD - (drewk) - (1) - Feb. 26, 2005, 09:56:43 AM EST

Yes, I've done^H^H^H^Hseen many attempts. -NT - (folkert) - Feb. 26, 2005, 10:15:55 AM EST

Hey, if you can't be loose w/an argument here, - (mmoffitt) - (14) - Feb. 24, 2005, 04:59:06 PM EST

You mean you're claiming a right to idiocy? - (ben_tilly) - (13) - Feb. 24, 2005, 06:10:04 PM EST

Have you read any lower court opinions lately? - (drewk) - (3) - Feb. 24, 2005, 06:32:59 PM EST

I've liked the SCO opinions so far :-) - (ben_tilly) - (2) - Feb. 24, 2005, 06:35:40 PM EST

How about this one - (drewk) - (1) - Feb. 24, 2005, 08:35:52 PM EST

Point but... - (ben_tilly) - Feb. 24, 2005, 09:09:36 PM EST

what do you call the lawyer that graduates in the bottom of - (boxley) - (1) - Feb. 24, 2005, 10:20:28 PM EST

Same deal with physicians. And that's DEADLY. -NT - (mmoffitt) - Feb. 25, 2005, 11:01:38 AM EST

Well, what can I say? - (mmoffitt) - (5) - Feb. 25, 2005, 11:04:03 AM EST

My point was pretty simple - (ben_tilly) - (3) - Feb. 25, 2005, 11:42:10 AM EST

Civility has returned - at last. - (mmoffitt) - (2) - Feb. 25, 2005, 12:05:21 PM EST

I unexpectedly reached my first condition for stopping - (ben_tilly) - (1) - Feb. 25, 2005, 12:08:38 PM EST

:-) -NT - (mmoffitt) - Feb. 25, 2005, 01:38:32 PM EST

The job of legislation was reserved for - (Arkadiy) - Feb. 25, 2005, 11:57:14 AM EST

On point 1, I meant in "Flame" not in general. -NT - (mmoffitt) - Feb. 25, 2005, 07:28:19 PM EST

Formula is still good - (tuberculosis) - Feb. 22, 2005, 08:45:39 PM EST

Well now - (bepatient) - (28) - Feb. 22, 2005, 08:51:55 PM EST

Because obviously - (ben_tilly) - (27) - Feb. 22, 2005, 09:24:38 PM EST

Obvious to some - (bepatient) - (26) - Feb. 22, 2005, 10:42:55 PM EST

I didn't think you could defend your position. Thanks. -NT - (mmoffitt) - (25) - Feb. 23, 2005, 09:15:03 AM EST

Defend against what? - (bepatient) - (24) - Feb. 23, 2005, 11:47:34 AM EST

The position that you said you had. - (mmoffitt) - (23) - Feb. 23, 2005, 11:49:03 AM EST

You may want to re-read the thread then. - (bepatient) - (22) - Feb. 23, 2005, 12:13:24 PM EST

Will you quit baiting me, I'm compulsive. - (mmoffitt) - (1) - Feb. 23, 2005, 01:26:01 PM EST

chuckle - (bepatient) - Feb. 23, 2005, 02:32:45 PM EST

Re: You may want to re-read the [code] then. - (Ashton) - (19) - Feb. 24, 2005, 06:03:24 AM EST

And that 'code word' was? - (imric) - (18) - Feb. 24, 2005, 06:58:55 AM EST

ICLRPD :-) (new thread) - (bepatient) - Feb. 24, 2005, 08:51:28 AM EST

I do so love stories from True Believers in 'theories'. - (Ashton) - (16) - Feb. 25, 2005, 05:54:59 AM EST

Since you are 'chickening' out from this thread - (imric) - (11) - Feb. 25, 2005, 07:28:10 AM EST

He's got a point. As do you. - (Another Scott) - (7) - Feb. 25, 2005, 08:04:17 AM EST

Oh hell no, you don't believe that do you? - (mmoffitt) - (4) - Feb. 25, 2005, 07:18:30 PM EST

But of course YOU would. - (imric) - (1) - Feb. 25, 2005, 07:42:28 PM EST

Yes, I'd rather have Breyer making law than Souder (R) IN. - (mmoffitt) - Feb. 26, 2005, 07:23:08 PM EST

You're a fan of Roy Moore then? - (Another Scott) - (1) - Feb. 25, 2005, 07:51:59 PM EST

It all depends. - (mmoffitt) - Feb. 26, 2005, 07:21:06 PM EST

Very good post, you fucking moron... - (CRConrad) - (1) - Feb. 28, 2005, 06:03:46 AM EST

That's a problem with this forum. (new thread) - (Another Scott) - Feb. 28, 2005, 07:59:43 AM EST

Received with appropriate satisfiction.. - (Ashton) - (2) - March 1, 2005, 02:35:53 AM EST

I get it now - (bepatient) - March 1, 2005, 06:36:00 AM EST

Bah. You are an idiot. - (imric) - March 1, 2005, 07:19:17 AM EST

My goodness, Ashey, stop pussy footing around... - (danreck) - (3) - Feb. 25, 2005, 04:53:20 PM EST

Fucking Reillusionment. What a concept - - (Ashton) - (2) - March 1, 2005, 03:27:22 AM EST

Waiting for Daylight... - (screamer) - (1) - March 2, 2005, 02:11:48 PM EST

Hey.. I know_____Who. Knows. - (Ashton) - March 3, 2005, 01:14:46 AM EST

YOU ARE ALL FUCKING IDIOTS AND ME > YOU (new thread) - (pwhysall) - March 1, 2005, 07:36:48 AM EST

iwethey.org

It's Howdy Doody Time!
86 ms