IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Now viewing page 3 of 92
[Prev] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ... 92 [Next]
     Is source control especially hard in WIndows? Or is it all compiled languages? - (drook) - (5)
         My experience with Visual Studio - (malraux)
         It is not the languages - (scoenye)
         I wonder if there's a Microsoft attitude somewhere. - (static)
         My guess: PEBCAK. [Edit:] Caused by Windows. [/Edit] - (CRConrad) - (1)
             On compiled language and dependencies - (drook)
     You know it's going to be a long night ... - (drook) - (11)
         LRPD that sucker! :) -NT - (a6l6e6x)
         Re: You know it's going to be a long night ... - (mvitale) - (9)
             Last time I was on a death march ... - (drook)
             I am so glad I don't work in a place like that. - (static) - (7)
                 High bus factor* there... - (mvitale) - (1)
                     No, others can code in it. - (static)
                 In bid-world, it happens - (pwhysall) - (4)
                     Unintended annoying consequence for developers: - (CRConrad) - (3)
                         Nah - (pwhysall) - (2)
                             I don't think they tried to sell us as "has X years practical experience in Y", just "knows Y." - (CRConrad) - (1)
                                 I wasn't contradicting you - (pwhysall)
     XKCD: Sad - (Another Scott)
     Mike published a quick tutorial on docker a while back and i lost the llink, anyone have it? -NT - (boxley) - (9)
         Dunno. - (Another Scott) - (1)
             It was our mikev currently on hiatus in Oz -NT - (boxley)
         How long ago? - (static) - (1)
             probably a year or so ago, will look at the redhat stuff instead -NT - (boxley)
         This one? - (mvitale) - (2)
             Happy Festivus! -NT - (drook)
             thank you -NT - (boxley)
         Not Mike's, but there's a whitepaper at the Register. - (a6l6e6x)
         Manning is having a 50% off sale on 2016 titles (and more?) this weekend. - (Another Scott)
     Are stored procs "hiding functionality"? - (drook) - (23)
         wag, the same as a shared library, you dont know where it came from -NT - (boxley)
         Interesting question. - (Another Scott) - (1)
             Better to manage that sort of problem through services - (malraux)
         Depends on how they're managed. - (malraux) - (10)
             And don't forget about sp's providing better performance on the database. -NT - (mmoffitt) - (9)
                 That depends - (malraux) - (8)
                     For OLTP applications, I disagree, with MS Sql Server anyway. - (mmoffitt) - (7)
                         Performance is the least of my concerns at this point - (drook) - (1)
                             Until it isn't any more. :-) - (malraux)
                         Performance != throughput - (malraux) - (4)
                             Interesting - (drook) - (2)
                                 I've looked at DB scale out, though not recently. - (static)
                                 Eventually the amount of work exceeds the capacity of a single machine to do it - (malraux)
                             sure, lets take the speed out of the cpu and replace it in multiple small connected units, :-) -NT - (boxley)
         Implementation detail, someone else's problem. - (pwhysall)
         Who is responsible for what? - (crazy) - (5)
             I'm coming down on the side of your data integrity comment - (drook) - (4)
                 Sounds like a management problem. - (static) - (2)
                     You think? - (drook) - (1)
                         Not surprised at all. - (static)
                 Someone's going to be writing something that deals with integrity. - (malraux)
         Re: Are stored procs "hiding functionality"? - (mvitale) - (1)
             I used utPLSQL in a former life. - (malraux)
     Scraping incoming emails for stuff - (pwhysall) - (2)
         monarch maybe? -NT - (boxley) - (1)
             I've used it a loooooooong time ago - (pwhysall)
     a post in the apple forum makes me want to ask who is using docker in production? - (boxley) - (5)
         We're looking to. - (static) - (1)
             thanks -NT - (boxley)
         Just using AWS instances. - (malraux)
         Comparison of native vs. container vs. VM - (malraux) - (1)
             thank you -NT - (boxley)
     Spaces! Tabs! Vim! Emacs! - (drook) - (24)
         unalias vi -NT - (boxley)
         Heh - (pwhysall)
         I agree with him - (crazy)
         Re: Spaces! Tabs! Vim! Emacs! - (mvitale) - (19)
             Neat. - (Another Scott) - (18)
                 When I work on someone else's code I don't reformat the whole thing - (drook) - (17)
                     Ah, excellent point. -NT - (Another Scott)
                     +5, Useful. - (static)
                     Never mind that - (pwhysall) - (6)
                         You mean ... ? - (drook) - (1)
                             Exactly so. -NT - (pwhysall)
                         Ooh. That's evil. - (Another Scott) - (2)
                             Yes and no - (drook)
                             Most proper software shops... - (pwhysall)
                         Definitely comes down to standards. - (malraux)
                     My solution for mutlple authors... - (hnick) - (7)
                         Command line Emacs is pretty fancy... ;-) -NT - (malraux) - (6)
                             True... - (hnick) - (5)
                                 "Just edit files" - (malraux) - (4)
                                     I notice you didn't dispute "second operating system" -NT - (drook) - (1)
                                         UNIX is a subprocess that runs under Emacs. -NT - (malraux)
                                     Oh, I know... - (hnick) - (1)
                                         :-) -NT - (malraux)
         Silly. - (malraux)
     Rapt so D - (drook)
     Underhanded C winner - (drook) - (1)
         Neat. Thanks for the pointer. I Я A Programmer today, also too. - (Another Scott)
Now viewing page 3 of 92
[Prev] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ... 92 [Next]

Ashton'd best cease derision; egregious fumblings garner hatred in judgemental klans. Lest matters natter on (precipitating quagmires), raconteur Scott transliterates umpteen verbs. Wordwright Xanadu, your zIWETHEY. Accordingly, blithely calling due eclectic, freewheeling games heedlessly invites jabber. Kenning LRPD meanings necessitates occasional, personal, quiet ruminations. Such thoughts unleash virtually wanton xenophilic yearnings: Zen Achieved.
1,560 ms