IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Now viewing page 8 of 91
[Prev] 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ... 91 [Next]
     Anyone here good with Crystal Reports? - (lincoln) - (3)
         Nope, but your SQL could be significantly simplified, AFAICS - (CRConrad) - (1)
             Unfortunately, Crystal Reports - (lincoln)
         It's been a long time, but I'll take a stab. - (mmoffitt)
     Are you a brogrammer? - (malraux) - (10)
         Your BQ is 20 ...making you a Dude-veloper -NT - (drook)
         Geek here. -NT - (mmoffitt)
         0 ... making you a Regular Joegrammer -NT - (mvitale)
         Nope - (crazy)
         Ditto. -NT - (Another Scott)
         Standard Nerd here. - (static) - (1)
             Standard Nerd here --- Ditto -NT - (jbrabeck)
         Regular joegrammer? - (Steve Lowe) - (1)
             Told me my old rock is too old. F'em -NT - (crazy)
         Re: Are you a brogrammer? - (rcsteiner)
     Node.js is bad ass rock star tech. With async IO. - (malraux) - (3)
         Re: Node.js is bad ass rock star tech. With async IO. - (folkert) - (2)
             I know that second guy -NT - (drook) - (1)
                 I report to that second guy. -NT - (mmoffitt)
     Ruby question - (crazy) - (2)
         At least as of 2007, it doesn't seem to be there. - (Another Scott) - (1)
             BT's response - (crazy)
     XML question on "disapble-output-escaping" - (drook) - (18)
         Re: XML question on "disapble-output-escaping" - (mvitale) - (15)
             Uhh ... not getting what you're saying -NT - (drook) - (2)
                 He's having the inverse problem ;-) - (scoenye)
                 Check again. Sorry. -NT - (mvitale)
             That's (kind of) what I'm thinking - (drook) - (11)
                 Not nearly that simple. - (static) - (10)
                     Yeah, not at all ... well, maybe it is - (drook) - (9)
                         Ah... - (static) - (8)
                             It's legal? Well crap, this argument just got a lot harder - (drook) - (7)
                                 "Into the database"? - (static) - (6)
                                     Umm ... yeah - (drook) - (5)
                                         ? Its been a few years since I went to xml dtd school - (boxley) - (4)
                                             It's not a string - (drook) - (3)
                                                 not my point - (boxley) - (2)
                                                     Well ... - (drook) - (1)
                                                         I guess that's better than binary blobs. - (static)
         Based on the first line and the rest of the thread - (scoenye) - (1)
             That's a good point - (drook)
     Well that was fun. A NULL in a directory name? - (Another Scott) - (12)
         There is also a difference... - (folkert)
         Re: Well that was fun. A NULL in a directory name? - (mvitale) - (4)
             What Mike said... - (scoenye) - (2)
                 Thanks for the correction. - (Another Scott)
                 Backslashes are for escaping things - (malraux)
             It's an easy fix. - (Another Scott)
         for what it's worth - (lincoln) - (3)
             It's not an OS issue, it a python method issue. - (Another Scott) - (2)
                 Not just Python - (scoenye) - (1)
                     Null terminated strings are evil. - (Another Scott)
         This is, of course, actually a Windows bug. - (static) - (1)
             Blame Kildall. - (Another Scott)
     My brother, myself - (rcareaga) - (1)
         Of course he needed the brackets, how else would it solve? -NT - (boxley)
     Database Question. - (mmoffitt) - (11)
         Wow... that was deviant! - (folkert) - (8)
             Heh. - (mmoffitt) - (7)
                 *Boggle* is entirely appropriate. - (static) - (6)
                     Better than this - (drook) - (1)
                         I guess I'm lucky. - (static)
                     I agree on the 200. - (mmoffitt) - (3)
                         What is your update schedule? And will you be coding in it? - (crazy) - (2)
                             Nope. Happily I will not be directly involved in any of it. - (mmoffitt) - (1)
                                 Smart move -NT - (crazy)
         OLTP? Not a data warehouse? -NT - (S1mon_Jester) - (1)
             Re: OLTP? Not a data warehouse? - (mmoffitt)
     Lisp or Smalltalk or something else? - (crazy) - (28)
         Dunno. But on the perl stuff... - (Another Scott) - (1)
             Oh, he schemed - (crazy)
         #2 == Squeak - (folkert)
         Re: Lisp or Smalltalk or something else? - (malraux)
         squeek is interesting but dunno how marketable - (boxley) - (23)
             Ruby and financial companies - (malraux) - (22)
                 they use the mq for messaging -NT - (boxley) - (21)
                     You mean Perl MQ? - (folkert) - (1)
                         no - (boxley)
                     Yeah, but Ruby? - (malraux) - (18)
                         slow vs faster dev time? -NT - (boxley) - (7)
                             Does it really matter? - (folkert) - (5)
                                 Nope - (malraux) - (3)
                                     Agreed - (crazy) - (2)
                                         I with I did know lithp. - (pwhysall)
                                         I've done LISP - (malraux)
                                 Depends on the industry - (drook)
                             Not in the financial world - (malraux)
                         I seem to recall - (S1mon_Jester) - (9)
                             Re: I seem to recall - (pwhysall) - (4)
                                 Yes but... - (folkert) - (3)
                                     Re: Yes but... - (pwhysall) - (1)
                                         We aren't experiencing... - (folkert)
                                     You are confusing two things: - (malraux)
                             And they're working on it - (malraux) - (3)
                                 Now that is... - (folkert) - (2)
                                     Re: Now that is... - (malraux) - (1)
                                         Damn straight - (crazy)
     What is this? - (malraux) - (16)
         Re: What is this? - (mvitale)
         Looks like... - (Another Scott)
         First guess - (drook) - (7)
             That's what I thought, too. - (static)
             Pull out the Hip owl book - (crazy)
             Ding. - (malraux) - (3)
                 Booyah! - (drook) - (1)
                     Re: Booyah! - (malraux)
                 hmmm - (folkert)
             Re: First guess - (pwhysall)
         So... - (folkert) - (1)
             So... - (folkert)
         Haven't looked past 1st screen yet - (crazy) - (1)
             Nope. - (folkert)
         part of a cert? -NT - (boxley)
         definitely not a programming language -NT - (lincoln)
Now viewing page 8 of 91
[Prev] 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ... 91 [Next]

...introduce an "if", and you're down the slippery slope. You add "for", and it's an avalanche. Then the "while" falls on you, and you're buried.
697 ms