Re: amputate the leadership ... RIGHT ON!

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #92,536 by mmoffitt 3/28/03 4:07:54 PM Reply	Re: amputate the leadership ... RIGHT ON! Everyone knows WE are the only ones intitled to use WMD. bcnu, Mikem Osama bin Laden's brother could fly in US airspace 9/15/01, but I had to wait for FBI and CIA background checks, 'nuff said?
Post #92,538 by cybermace5 3/28/03 4:11:44 PM Reply	Re: amputate the leadership ... RIGHT ON! Perhaps I should clarify that to mean the leadership that would use WMD. So, anyone heard from Saddam lately?
Post #92,541 by mmoffitt 3/28/03 4:17:33 PM Reply	You mean ours? Or don't nukes count? bcnu, Mikem Osama bin Laden's brother could fly in US airspace 9/15/01, but I had to wait for FBI and CIA background checks, 'nuff said?
Post #92,548 by cybermace5 3/28/03 4:26:20 PM Reply	Re: You mean ours? If you think our government would deploy nukes in Iraq, you are one seriously unbalanced individual.
Post #92,553 by mmoffitt 3/28/03 4:32:23 PM Reply	I forgot you were a toddler. Hiroshima, Nagasaki, ... pick up a history book some time. bcnu, Mikem Osama bin Laden's brother could fly in US airspace 9/15/01, but I had to wait for FBI and CIA background checks, 'nuff said?
Post #92,560 by cybermace5 3/28/03 4:39:26 PM Reply	Re: I forgot you were a toddler. History. Precisely. One hopes we have learned some lessons since then. Just because Harry Truman shares my birthday, it doesn't make him my favorite president. This administration is not going to nuke civilians. Don't forget that we don't want to contaminate the oil fields; that meshes nicely with your cynileftist view of the administration's interests, doesn't it?
Post #92,563 by mmoffitt 3/28/03 4:41:30 PM Reply	Would that were so. One hopes we have learned some lessons since then. I see no evidence that the current junta (ours, not theirs) has learned anything about anything. bcnu, Mikem Osama bin Laden's brother could fly in US airspace 9/15/01, but I had to wait for FBI and CIA background checks, 'nuff said?
Post #92,566 by cybermace5 3/28/03 4:46:38 PM Reply	And unbalanced you are. Add a layer to the tinfoil hat.
Post #92,555 by inthane-chan 3/28/03 4:34:17 PM Reply	Naw. He's referring to the fact that the United States is the only nation that has ever used a nuclear weapon as an act of agression - C.F. Hiroshima and Nagasaki. 'Course, (and of course I can't find it now... Naturally.) I seem to remember our Deserter in Chief making some comments about how "all options are on the table" when asked about the possibility of using nuclear weapons in Iraq. God does not play dice with the universe: He plays an ineffable game of His own devising, which might be compared, from the perspective of any of the other players [i.e. everybody], to being involved in an obscure and complex variant of poker in a pitch-dark room, with blank cards, for infinite stakes, with a Dealer who won't tell you the rules, and who smiles all the time.

Iraqi POWs say RG getting chembios - (deSitter) - (101) - March 28, 2003, 02:46:02 PM EST

Bad link: 404 not found - (admin) - (100) - March 28, 2003, 03:07:50 PM EST

Works on mine. -NT - (Brandioch) - (99) - March 28, 2003, 02:58:42 PM EST

The clock is ticking - (cybermace5) - (98) - March 28, 2003, 03:28:14 PM EST

That's the spirit, chum. - (Brandioch) - (97) - March 28, 2003, 03:32:58 PM EST

Re: That's the spirit, chum. - (cybermace5) - (96) - March 28, 2003, 03:43:01 PM EST

Re: amputate the leadership ... RIGHT ON! - (mmoffitt) - (8) - March 28, 2003, 04:07:54 PM EST

Re: amputate the leadership ... RIGHT ON! - (cybermace5) - (7) - March 28, 2003, 04:11:44 PM EST

You mean ours? - (mmoffitt) - (6) - March 28, 2003, 04:17:33 PM EST

Re: You mean ours? - (cybermace5) - (5) - March 28, 2003, 04:26:20 PM EST

I forgot you were a toddler. - (mmoffitt) - (3) - March 28, 2003, 04:32:23 PM EST

Re: I forgot you were a toddler. - (cybermace5) - (2) - March 28, 2003, 04:39:26 PM EST

Would that were so. - (mmoffitt) - (1) - March 28, 2003, 04:41:30 PM EST

And unbalanced you are. Add a layer to the tinfoil hat. -NT - (cybermace5) - March 28, 2003, 04:46:38 PM EST

Naw. - (inthane-chan) - March 28, 2003, 04:34:17 PM EST

I didn't think you would be man enough. - (Brandioch) - (86) - March 28, 2003, 04:09:57 PM EST

Fun game. - (bepatient) - (6) - March 28, 2003, 04:14:00 PM EST

I don't think so. - (mmoffitt) - (2) - March 28, 2003, 04:18:51 PM EST

Glad I don't watch it then. -NT - (bepatient) - (1) - March 28, 2003, 04:55:22 PM EST

Really? I thought you were Editor At Large (in Chief?) -NT - (mmoffitt) - March 28, 2003, 04:59:27 PM EST

I predict... - (folkert) - (2) - March 28, 2003, 04:24:29 PM EST

It's funny because it's hurting you so much. - (Brandioch) - (1) - March 28, 2003, 05:26:52 PM EST

I always let losers have thier words. -NT - (folkert) - March 28, 2003, 05:36:04 PM EST

Re: I didn't think you would be man enough. - (cybermace5) - (78) - March 28, 2003, 04:21:08 PM EST

It's called a "dictionary". I'll send you one. - (Brandioch) - (77) - March 28, 2003, 05:24:36 PM EST

Re: It's called a "dictionary". I'll send you one. - (cybermace5) - (76) - March 28, 2003, 05:42:16 PM EST

No, actually he's saying something quite different - (jake123) - (26) - March 28, 2003, 05:45:58 PM EST

Re: No, actually he's saying something quite different - (cybermace5) - (25) - March 28, 2003, 05:56:29 PM EST

Don't you ever read? - (Brandioch) - (24) - March 28, 2003, 06:47:39 PM EST

Re: Don't you ever read? - (cybermace5) - (23) - March 28, 2003, 11:20:09 PM EST

I did not say the military was "bungling fools". - (Brandioch) - (22) - March 29, 2003, 12:02:38 AM EST

Re: I did not say the military was "bungling fools". - (cybermace5) - (21) - March 29, 2003, 12:10:20 AM EST

So the US is subordinate to the UN now? - (Brandioch) - (20) - March 29, 2003, 12:19:21 PM EST

Did I say that? No. - (cybermace5) - (19) - March 29, 2003, 01:31:06 PM EST

The UN will investigate only if the US allows them to. - (Brandioch) - (18) - March 29, 2003, 03:13:22 PM EST

Re: The UN will investigate only if the US allows them to. - (cybermace5) - (17) - March 29, 2003, 03:36:00 PM EST

Now the presumptions within that little piece of flummox - (Ashton) - (1) - March 29, 2003, 07:29:03 PM EST

Coherent. Sentences. Focus! -NT - (cybermace5) - March 29, 2003, 07:45:04 PM EST

What part of my previous post did you not read? - (Brandioch) - (14) - March 29, 2003, 11:44:58 PM EST

Re: What part of my previous post did you not read? - (cybermace5) - (13) - March 30, 2003, 01:09:32 AM EST

So, because I'm 100% accurate, I'm an idiot? - (Brandioch) - (12) - March 30, 2003, 02:05:52 AM EST

You are 100% accurate... - (cybermace5) - (11) - March 30, 2003, 02:55:49 AM EST

How many days into this war are we? - (Brandioch) - (10) - March 30, 2003, 03:14:14 AM EST

Re: How many days into this war are we? - (cybermace5) - (9) - March 30, 2003, 01:42:10 PM EST

I didn't ask if it was over. I asked how many days into it. -NT - (Brandioch) - (8) - March 30, 2003, 03:12:54 PM EST

Re: I didn't ask if it was over. I asked how many days into - (cybermace5) - (7) - March 30, 2003, 04:03:00 PM EST

That's the fact! - (Brandioch) - (6) - March 30, 2003, 04:35:14 PM EST

Ummm - (cybermace5) - (5) - March 30, 2003, 07:31:28 PM EST

Fire can be extinguished. - (Brandioch) - (4) - March 30, 2003, 10:18:11 PM EST

Re: Fire can be extinguished. - (cybermace5) - (3) - March 31, 2003, 12:36:36 PM EST

So they did hire you? - (Brandioch) - (2) - March 31, 2003, 01:55:57 PM EST

Re: So they did hire you? - (cybermace5) - (1) - March 31, 2003, 02:56:08 PM EST

That would be the cities? - (Brandioch) - March 31, 2003, 07:36:38 PM EST

It's called "reading with comprehension". - (Brandioch) - (48) - March 28, 2003, 05:46:44 PM EST

Re: It's called "reading with comprehension". - (cybermace5) - (47) - March 28, 2003, 05:50:20 PM EST

Why would he do that? - (jake123) - (46) - March 28, 2003, 05:55:10 PM EST

Re: Why would he do that? - (cybermace5) - (45) - March 28, 2003, 05:57:54 PM EST

Nuclear material from Niger that Iraq tried to buy. - (Brandioch) - March 28, 2003, 06:48:52 PM EST

Gulf of Tonkin - (jake123) - March 28, 2003, 06:50:08 PM EST

Re: Why would he do that? - (rcareaga) - March 28, 2003, 07:49:11 PM EST

Your examples - (cybermace5) - (41) - March 28, 2003, 08:59:14 PM EST

Manufacturing evidence in the Gulf of Tonkin incident - (jake123) - (36) - March 28, 2003, 09:05:44 PM EST

Re: Manufacturing evidence in the Gulf of Tonkin incident - (cybermace5) - (35) - March 28, 2003, 09:41:18 PM EST

Re: Manufacturing evidence in the Gulf of Tonkin incident - (jake123) - (34) - March 29, 2003, 08:38:38 AM EST

Re: Manufacturing evidence in the Gulf of Tonkin incident - (cybermace5) - (33) - March 29, 2003, 02:33:52 PM EST

Still trolling I see. - (jake123) - (32) - March 29, 2003, 02:42:44 PM EST

Re: Still trolling I see. - (cybermace5) - (31) - March 29, 2003, 02:47:58 PM EST

Re: Still trolling I see. - (jake123) - (30) - March 29, 2003, 02:54:47 PM EST

Re: Still trolling I see. - (cybermace5) - (29) - March 29, 2003, 03:01:00 PM EST

Does "Niger" ring a bell? - (Brandioch) - (28) - March 29, 2003, 03:16:35 PM EST

Re: Does "Niger" ring a bell? - (cybermace5) - (5) - March 29, 2003, 03:32:45 PM EST

I said our government used faked documents. - (Brandioch) - (4) - March 30, 2003, 02:42:57 AM EST

Re: I said our government used faked documents. - (cybermace5) - (3) - March 30, 2003, 04:03:55 PM EST

"what some guy with a Muslim name says"? - (Brandioch) - (2) - March 30, 2003, 04:40:37 PM EST

Re: "what some guy with a Muslim name says"? - (cybermace5) - (1) - March 30, 2003, 07:35:49 PM EST

a lot of us can, as a group we are geographically capable -NT - (boxley) - March 30, 2003, 07:52:21 PM EST

Please it is Nigeria - (orion) - (21) - March 29, 2003, 04:55:18 PM EST

Re: Please it is Nigeria - (cybermace5) - (1) - March 29, 2003, 05:04:14 PM EST

Well I admit - (orion) - March 29, 2003, 08:58:16 PM EST

This is my butt! Pucker up 'cause you'll be kissing it. - (Brandioch) - (18) - March 30, 2003, 02:09:00 AM EST

Re: This is my butt! Pucker up 'cause you'll be kissing it. - (cybermace5) - (9) - March 30, 2003, 02:53:09 AM EST

The question is "do I care"? - (Brandioch) - (8) - March 30, 2003, 03:16:41 AM EST

Re: The question is "do I care"? - (cybermace5) - (7) - March 30, 2003, 01:44:26 PM EST

"smarter"? - (Brandioch) - (6) - March 30, 2003, 03:17:37 PM EST

Re: "smarter"? - (cybermace5) - (5) - March 30, 2003, 04:06:43 PM EST

Oh, so you weren't wrong on Niger? - (Brandioch) - (4) - March 30, 2003, 04:29:15 PM EST

Re: Oh, so you weren't wrong on Niger? - (cybermace5) - (3) - March 31, 2003, 12:40:14 PM EST

Now THAT is funny. - (Brandioch) - (2) - March 31, 2003, 01:45:33 PM EST

Re: Now THAT is funny. - (cybermace5) - (1) - March 31, 2003, 03:03:48 PM EST

The point was you did not know the situation. - (Brandioch) - April 1, 2003, 12:28:50 AM EST

I admit, I was wrong - (orion) - (7) - March 31, 2003, 05:57:32 PM EST

One fact accomplished. - (Brandioch) - (6) - March 31, 2003, 06:21:44 PM EST

SLMRK, LMRKC has one... - (folkert) - March 31, 2003, 06:39:09 PM EST

Conventional warheads on long-range rockets - (orion) - (4) - March 31, 2003, 08:09:15 PM EST

Resolution 678 addresses weapons - (jake123) - (2) - March 31, 2003, 09:31:24 PM EST

WMD is shorthand. 687 addresses the 150 km limit. - (Another Scott) - (1) - March 31, 2003, 09:41:59 PM EST

Ok I admit they are not WMD - (orion) - March 31, 2003, 10:51:09 PM EST

That was never a UN definition. - (Brandioch) - March 31, 2003, 09:46:45 PM EST

Re: Your examples - (rcareaga) - March 28, 2003, 09:23:53 PM EST

Such actions are ALWAYS rooted to a few individuals.... - (Simon_Jester) - (1) - March 29, 2003, 07:16:28 AM EST

Re: Such actions are ALWAYS rooted to a few individuals.... - (cybermace5) - March 29, 2003, 01:28:30 PM EST

CYBERMACE5 rapidly degenerating debate to Marlowe level - (dmarker) - March 29, 2003, 07:49:34 AM EST

iwethey.org

I ripped my pants!
116 ms