IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Regional/World Conflict Forum / One fact accomplished.
Post #93,318
by Brandioch
3/31/03 6:21:44 PM
Reply
New One fact accomplished.
Only a few thousand left to go.

Well, maybe I've managed to get TWO facts through your head. That is, if you can tell the difference between a rocket with a conventional warhead and a "WMD".

But I wouldn't bet on it.

:D

The question remains, how many times do you have to be proven wrong before you'll admit that you have no idea what is happening in this situation?
Post #93,320
by folkert
Picture of folkert
3/31/03 6:39:09 PM
Reply
New SLMRK, LMRKC has one...
Silly Lucky Magic Rabbit King, Lucky Magic Rabbit King Cereal has one in every box...


Those rhetorical questions only work on those that read them for what they are...
b4k4^2
[link|mailto:curley95@attbi.com|greg] - Grand-Master Artist in IT
[link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry/|REMEMBER ED CURRY!]  
[link|http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,857673,00.asp|Microsoft develops apps for Linux by 2004]
Heimatland Geheime Staatspolizei reminds:
These [link|http://www.whitehouse.gov/pcipb/cyberspace_strategy.pdf|Civilian General Orders], please memorize them.
"Questions" will be asked at checkpoints.
Post #93,331
by orion
Picture of orion
3/31/03 8:09:15 PM
Reply
New Conventional warheads on long-range rockets
are a violation of UN Resolution 678. I thought that constituted as a WOMD because it violated the resolution. But by using your definition, not the UN Resolution 678's definition, it isn't a WOMD. I see that much.

"Bill gates cannot guarantee Windows, so how are you going to guarantee my safety?"
-John Crichton to the Emperor of the Scarrans on [link|http://www.farscape.com|FarScape]
Post #93,346
by jake123
3/31/03 9:31:24 PM
Reply
New Resolution 678 addresses weapons
some of which are considered WMD. Conventional warheads on long range missiles is not one of those weapons.
--\r\n-------------------------------------------------------------------\r\n* Jack Troughton                            jake at consultron.ca *\r\n* [link|http://consultron.ca|http://consultron.ca]                   [link|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca|irc://irc.ecomstation.ca] *\r\n* Kingston Ontario Canada               [link|news://news.consultron.ca|news://news.consultron.ca] *\r\n-------------------------------------------------------------------
Post #93,347
by Another Scott
3/31/03 9:41:59 PM
Reply
New WMD is shorthand. 687 addresses the 150 km limit.
US media, and politicians who want their sound-bite in the US media, these days can't take the time to say that missiles having range greater than 150 km are proscribed to Iraq, just as biological, chemical and nuclear weapons and production facilities are proscribed. They all get lumped under "WMD". It's just unfortunate short-hand for the weapons and weapons-systems that the UN has said Iraq is forbidden to have.

[link|http://www.un.int/usa/02_068.htm|Here]:

[link|http://www.un.org/Docs/scres/1991/687e.pdf|UN Security Council resolution 687] of April 3, 1991 will remain in force. Not only does the resolution require Iraq to destroy its nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs, and limit the range of Iraq's ballistic missiles to 150 km. The resolution also prohibits the sale or supply to Iraq of all arms and related materials. This includes dual-use products and technologies related to military purposes as well as training and technical support. There will be no easing of restrictions on Iraq's rearmament.


Cheers,
Scott.
Post #93,362
by orion
Picture of orion
3/31/03 10:51:09 PM
Reply
New Ok I admit they are not WMD
even if they are covered under 678 as Iraq not supposed to have them.

"Bill gates cannot guarantee Windows, so how are you going to guarantee my safety?"
-John Crichton to the Emperor of the Scarrans on [link|http://www.farscape.com|FarScape]
Post #93,348
by Brandioch
3/31/03 9:46:45 PM
Reply
New That was never a UN definition.
Certain weapons were forbidden to Iraq.

One category of those weapons were "WMD's".

Another category were "rockets with range beyond X kilometers".

They are NOT THE SAME.

I messel that constituted as a WOMD because it violated the resolution.
And THAT is the reason I consider you to be an idiot.

You do NOT know what a "WMD" is.

Instead, you demonstrate your IGNORANCE and think that ANY forbidden weapon is a "WMD".

That behaviour is the behaviour of an idiot.

Therefore, you are an idiot.

Instead of spouting your ignorance on the subject, why not try READING about the subject?

Or would that be too much effort?

Just keep swallowing the propaganda and lies.

They're all bite-sized, sugar-coated and pre-digested for you.
     Iraqi POWs say RG getting chembios - (deSitter) - (101) - March 28, 2003, 02:46:02 PM EST
         Bad link: 404 not found - (admin) - (100) - March 28, 2003, 03:07:50 PM EST
             Works on mine. -NT - (Brandioch) - (99) - March 28, 2003, 02:58:42 PM EST
                 The clock is ticking - (cybermace5) - (98) - March 28, 2003, 03:28:14 PM EST
                     That's the spirit, chum. - (Brandioch) - (97) - March 28, 2003, 03:32:58 PM EST
                         Re: That's the spirit, chum. - (cybermace5) - (96) - March 28, 2003, 03:43:01 PM EST
                             Re: amputate the leadership ... RIGHT ON! - (mmoffitt) - (8) - March 28, 2003, 04:07:54 PM EST
                                 Re: amputate the leadership ... RIGHT ON! - (cybermace5) - (7) - March 28, 2003, 04:11:44 PM EST
                                     You mean ours? - (mmoffitt) - (6) - March 28, 2003, 04:17:33 PM EST
                                         Re: You mean ours? - (cybermace5) - (5) - March 28, 2003, 04:26:20 PM EST
                                             I forgot you were a toddler. - (mmoffitt) - (3) - March 28, 2003, 04:32:23 PM EST
                                                 Re: I forgot you were a toddler. - (cybermace5) - (2) - March 28, 2003, 04:39:26 PM EST
                                                     Would that were so. - (mmoffitt) - (1) - March 28, 2003, 04:41:30 PM EST
                                                         And unbalanced you are. Add a layer to the tinfoil hat. -NT - (cybermace5) - March 28, 2003, 04:46:38 PM EST
                                             Naw. - (inthane-chan) - March 28, 2003, 04:34:17 PM EST
                             I didn't think you would be man enough. - (Brandioch) - (86) - March 28, 2003, 04:09:57 PM EST
                                 Fun game. - (bepatient) - (6) - March 28, 2003, 04:14:00 PM EST
                                     I don't think so. - (mmoffitt) - (2) - March 28, 2003, 04:18:51 PM EST
                                         Glad I don't watch it then. -NT - (bepatient) - (1) - March 28, 2003, 04:55:22 PM EST
                                             Really? I thought you were Editor At Large (in Chief?) -NT - (mmoffitt) - March 28, 2003, 04:59:27 PM EST
                                     I predict... - (folkert) - (2) - March 28, 2003, 04:24:29 PM EST
                                         It's funny because it's hurting you so much. - (Brandioch) - (1) - March 28, 2003, 05:26:52 PM EST
                                             I always let losers have thier words. -NT - (folkert) - March 28, 2003, 05:36:04 PM EST
                                 Re: I didn't think you would be man enough. - (cybermace5) - (78) - March 28, 2003, 04:21:08 PM EST
                                     It's called a "dictionary". I'll send you one. - (Brandioch) - (77) - March 28, 2003, 05:24:36 PM EST
                                         Re: It's called a "dictionary". I'll send you one. - (cybermace5) - (76) - March 28, 2003, 05:42:16 PM EST
                                             No, actually he's saying something quite different - (jake123) - (26) - March 28, 2003, 05:45:58 PM EST
                                                 Re: No, actually he's saying something quite different - (cybermace5) - (25) - March 28, 2003, 05:56:29 PM EST
                                                     Don't you ever read? - (Brandioch) - (24) - March 28, 2003, 06:47:39 PM EST
                                                         Re: Don't you ever read? - (cybermace5) - (23) - March 28, 2003, 11:20:09 PM EST
                                                             I did not say the military was "bungling fools". - (Brandioch) - (22) - March 29, 2003, 12:02:38 AM EST
                                                                 Re: I did not say the military was "bungling fools". - (cybermace5) - (21) - March 29, 2003, 12:10:20 AM EST
                                                                     So the US is subordinate to the UN now? - (Brandioch) - (20) - March 29, 2003, 12:19:21 PM EST
                                                                         Did I say that? No. - (cybermace5) - (19) - March 29, 2003, 01:31:06 PM EST
                                                                             The UN will investigate only if the US allows them to. - (Brandioch) - (18) - March 29, 2003, 03:13:22 PM EST
                                                                                 Re: The UN will investigate only if the US allows them to. - (cybermace5) - (17) - March 29, 2003, 03:36:00 PM EST
                                                                                     Now the presumptions within that little piece of flummox - (Ashton) - (1) - March 29, 2003, 07:29:03 PM EST
                                                                                         Coherent. Sentences. Focus! -NT - (cybermace5) - March 29, 2003, 07:45:04 PM EST
                                                                                     What part of my previous post did you not read? - (Brandioch) - (14) - March 29, 2003, 11:44:58 PM EST
                                                                                         Re: What part of my previous post did you not read? - (cybermace5) - (13) - March 30, 2003, 01:09:32 AM EST
                                                                                             So, because I'm 100% accurate, I'm an idiot? - (Brandioch) - (12) - March 30, 2003, 02:05:52 AM EST
                                                                                                 You are 100% accurate... - (cybermace5) - (11) - March 30, 2003, 02:55:49 AM EST
                                                                                                     How many days into this war are we? - (Brandioch) - (10) - March 30, 2003, 03:14:14 AM EST
                                                                                                         Re: How many days into this war are we? - (cybermace5) - (9) - March 30, 2003, 01:42:10 PM EST
                                                                                                             I didn't ask if it was over. I asked how many days into it. -NT - (Brandioch) - (8) - March 30, 2003, 03:12:54 PM EST
                                                                                                                 Re: I didn't ask if it was over. I asked how many days into - (cybermace5) - (7) - March 30, 2003, 04:03:00 PM EST
                                                                                                                     That's the fact! - (Brandioch) - (6) - March 30, 2003, 04:35:14 PM EST
                                                                                                                         Ummm - (cybermace5) - (5) - March 30, 2003, 07:31:28 PM EST
                                                                                                                             Fire can be extinguished. - (Brandioch) - (4) - March 30, 2003, 10:18:11 PM EST
                                                                                                                                 Re: Fire can be extinguished. - (cybermace5) - (3) - March 31, 2003, 12:36:36 PM EST
                                                                                                                                     So they did hire you? - (Brandioch) - (2) - March 31, 2003, 01:55:57 PM EST
                                                                                                                                         Re: So they did hire you? - (cybermace5) - (1) - March 31, 2003, 02:56:08 PM EST
                                                                                                                                             That would be the cities? - (Brandioch) - March 31, 2003, 07:36:38 PM EST
                                             It's called "reading with comprehension". - (Brandioch) - (48) - March 28, 2003, 05:46:44 PM EST
                                                 Re: It's called "reading with comprehension". - (cybermace5) - (47) - March 28, 2003, 05:50:20 PM EST
                                                     Why would he do that? - (jake123) - (46) - March 28, 2003, 05:55:10 PM EST
                                                         Re: Why would he do that? - (cybermace5) - (45) - March 28, 2003, 05:57:54 PM EST
                                                             Nuclear material from Niger that Iraq tried to buy. - (Brandioch) - March 28, 2003, 06:48:52 PM EST
                                                             Gulf of Tonkin - (jake123) - March 28, 2003, 06:50:08 PM EST
                                                             Re: Why would he do that? - (rcareaga) - March 28, 2003, 07:49:11 PM EST
                                                             Your examples - (cybermace5) - (41) - March 28, 2003, 08:59:14 PM EST
                                                                 Manufacturing evidence in the Gulf of Tonkin incident - (jake123) - (36) - March 28, 2003, 09:05:44 PM EST
                                                                     Re: Manufacturing evidence in the Gulf of Tonkin incident - (cybermace5) - (35) - March 28, 2003, 09:41:18 PM EST
                                                                         Re: Manufacturing evidence in the Gulf of Tonkin incident - (jake123) - (34) - March 29, 2003, 08:38:38 AM EST
                                                                             Re: Manufacturing evidence in the Gulf of Tonkin incident - (cybermace5) - (33) - March 29, 2003, 02:33:52 PM EST
                                                                                 Still trolling I see. - (jake123) - (32) - March 29, 2003, 02:42:44 PM EST
                                                                                     Re: Still trolling I see. - (cybermace5) - (31) - March 29, 2003, 02:47:58 PM EST
                                                                                         Re: Still trolling I see. - (jake123) - (30) - March 29, 2003, 02:54:47 PM EST
                                                                                             Re: Still trolling I see. - (cybermace5) - (29) - March 29, 2003, 03:01:00 PM EST
                                                                                                 Does "Niger" ring a bell? - (Brandioch) - (28) - March 29, 2003, 03:16:35 PM EST
                                                                                                     Re: Does "Niger" ring a bell? - (cybermace5) - (5) - March 29, 2003, 03:32:45 PM EST
                                                                                                         I said our government used faked documents. - (Brandioch) - (4) - March 30, 2003, 02:42:57 AM EST
                                                                                                             Re: I said our government used faked documents. - (cybermace5) - (3) - March 30, 2003, 04:03:55 PM EST
                                                                                                                 "what some guy with a Muslim name says"? - (Brandioch) - (2) - March 30, 2003, 04:40:37 PM EST
                                                                                                                     Re: "what some guy with a Muslim name says"? - (cybermace5) - (1) - March 30, 2003, 07:35:49 PM EST
                                                                                                                         a lot of us can, as a group we are geographically capable -NT - (boxley) - March 30, 2003, 07:52:21 PM EST
                                                                                                     Please it is Nigeria - (orion) - (21) - March 29, 2003, 04:55:18 PM EST
                                                                                                         Re: Please it is Nigeria - (cybermace5) - (1) - March 29, 2003, 05:04:14 PM EST
                                                                                                             Well I admit - (orion) - March 29, 2003, 08:58:16 PM EST
                                                                                                         This is my butt! Pucker up 'cause you'll be kissing it. - (Brandioch) - (18) - March 30, 2003, 02:09:00 AM EST
                                                                                                             Re: This is my butt! Pucker up 'cause you'll be kissing it. - (cybermace5) - (9) - March 30, 2003, 02:53:09 AM EST
                                                                                                                 The question is "do I care"? - (Brandioch) - (8) - March 30, 2003, 03:16:41 AM EST
                                                                                                                     Re: The question is "do I care"? - (cybermace5) - (7) - March 30, 2003, 01:44:26 PM EST
                                                                                                                         "smarter"? - (Brandioch) - (6) - March 30, 2003, 03:17:37 PM EST
                                                                                                                             Re: "smarter"? - (cybermace5) - (5) - March 30, 2003, 04:06:43 PM EST
                                                                                                                                 Oh, so you weren't wrong on Niger? - (Brandioch) - (4) - March 30, 2003, 04:29:15 PM EST
                                                                                                                                     Re: Oh, so you weren't wrong on Niger? - (cybermace5) - (3) - March 31, 2003, 12:40:14 PM EST
                                                                                                                                         Now THAT is funny. - (Brandioch) - (2) - March 31, 2003, 01:45:33 PM EST
                                                                                                                                             Re: Now THAT is funny. - (cybermace5) - (1) - March 31, 2003, 03:03:48 PM EST
                                                                                                                                                 The point was you did not know the situation. - (Brandioch) - April 1, 2003, 12:28:50 AM EST
                                                                                                             I admit, I was wrong - (orion) - (7) - March 31, 2003, 05:57:32 PM EST
                                                                                                                 One fact accomplished. - (Brandioch) - (6) - March 31, 2003, 06:21:44 PM EST
                                                                                                                     SLMRK, LMRKC has one... - (folkert) - March 31, 2003, 06:39:09 PM EST
                                                                                                                     Conventional warheads on long-range rockets - (orion) - (4) - March 31, 2003, 08:09:15 PM EST
                                                                                                                         Resolution 678 addresses weapons - (jake123) - (2) - March 31, 2003, 09:31:24 PM EST
                                                                                                                             WMD is shorthand. 687 addresses the 150 km limit. - (Another Scott) - (1) - March 31, 2003, 09:41:59 PM EST
                                                                                                                                 Ok I admit they are not WMD - (orion) - March 31, 2003, 10:51:09 PM EST
                                                                                                                         That was never a UN definition. - (Brandioch) - March 31, 2003, 09:46:45 PM EST
                                                                 Re: Your examples - (rcareaga) - March 28, 2003, 09:23:53 PM EST
                                                                 Such actions are ALWAYS rooted to a few individuals.... - (Simon_Jester) - (1) - March 29, 2003, 07:16:28 AM EST
                                                                     Re: Such actions are ALWAYS rooted to a few individuals.... - (cybermace5) - March 29, 2003, 01:28:30 PM EST
                                                                 CYBERMACE5 rapidly degenerating debate to Marlowe level - (dmarker) - March 29, 2003, 07:49:34 AM EST

It's all fun and games until someone loses a lung.
116 ms