none needed and I expect rc to respond differently

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #85,066 by boxley 3/1/03 12:15:34 PM Reply	none needed and I expect rc to respond differently will work for cash and other incentives [link\|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html\|skill set] questions, help? [link\|mailto:pappas@catholic.org\|email pappas at catholic.org] \ufffdOmni Gaul Delenda est!\ufffd Ceasar
Post #85,079 by rcareaga 3/1/03 1:12:26 PM Reply	Re: none needed and I expect rc to respond differently "Which one of our examples is politicised?" Why mine, of course. Sorry, was this forbidden under the terms of engagement? I didn't discern that in the post in which you solicited examples, or in previous remarks like "did you bow down and genuflect to Clinton's cock every night?" What exactly are you expecting, then? cordially, "Die Welt ist alles, was der Fall ist."
Post #85,085 by boxley 3/1/03 2:20:11 PM Reply	exactly what I got because you did not see my post first I was hoping that perhaps you might have something else to post to my reasoned response. Was that previous remark directed to/at you? thanx, bill will work for cash and other incentives [link\|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html\|skill set] questions, help? [link\|mailto:pappas@catholic.org\|email pappas at catholic.org] \ufffdOmni Gaul Delenda est!\ufffd Ceasar

Now I understand the problem with Estrada's Judgeship - (boxley) - (46) - Feb. 27, 2003, 08:52:25 PM EST

Re: Now I understand the problem with Estrada's Judgeship - (rcareaga) - (42) - Feb. 27, 2003, 10:53:28 PM EST

ROFL...how true re: Novak and the weasels. -NT - (bepatient) - Feb. 27, 2003, 10:59:27 PM EST

Do you want to elaborate (for the ill-informed), your - (dmarker) - (40) - Feb. 28, 2003, 12:16:36 AM EST

Good God, where to begin? - (rcareaga) - (39) - Feb. 28, 2003, 01:37:40 AM EST

I Like it - reads well & enhances your stature as - (dmarker) - (38) - Feb. 28, 2003, 02:52:58 AM EST

Perhaps your comment should read - (boxley) - (37) - Feb. 28, 2003, 08:44:18 AM EST

and the undead horse you rode in on... - (rcareaga) - (3) - Feb. 28, 2003, 09:17:10 AM EST

oh, you one of those "the man could do no wrong" folks? - (boxley) - (2) - Feb. 28, 2003, 09:49:10 AM EST

So if someone doesn't agree with you.... - (Brandioch) - (1) - Feb. 28, 2003, 10:07:10 AM EST

not always, but it has happened enough times to be apt -NT - (boxley) - Feb. 28, 2003, 10:27:17 AM EST

ICLRPD (perhaps a first from this forum..) (new thread) - (jb4) - Feb. 28, 2003, 09:40:05 AM EST

"Say/do whatever it took to get the polls up and dam near.." - (Brandioch) - (22) - Feb. 28, 2003, 10:04:50 AM EST

lets see, - (boxley) - (21) - Feb. 28, 2003, 10:25:51 AM EST

You nailed it. - (Silverlock) - Feb. 28, 2003, 10:28:10 AM EST

Beyond irony - (rcareaga) - (5) - Feb. 28, 2003, 10:51:30 AM EST

Well I was sitting in my congress critters office ed(+quote) - (boxley) - (4) - Feb. 28, 2003, 11:43:38 AM EST

ah, well then... - (rcareaga) - (3) - Feb. 28, 2003, 11:23:59 AM EST

matanuska thunder fs*ck if I still smoked - (boxley) - (2) - Feb. 28, 2003, 11:33:33 AM EST

regular folk - (rcareaga) - (1) - Feb. 28, 2003, 11:39:24 AM EST

yabbut many of them wernt before they served a few years -NT - (boxley) - Feb. 10, 2006, 06:25:41 PM EST

Major nit - (jb4) - (2) - Feb. 28, 2003, 12:13:35 PM EST

a view you might find interesting - (boxley) - (1) - Feb. 28, 2003, 12:26:00 PM EST

Sorry, no sale! - (jb4) - Feb. 28, 2003, 03:01:40 PM EST

"backlash voters"? - (Brandioch) - (10) - Feb. 28, 2003, 02:46:17 PM EST

aww, poor baby, do you miss worshipping it? - (boxley) - (9) - Feb. 28, 2003, 04:54:08 PM EST

a Box on both their houses... (couldn't resist!) -NT - (inthane-chan) - Feb. 28, 2003, 04:59:03 PM EST

Count the number of INITIAL posts from you about him. - (Brandioch) - (7) - Feb. 28, 2003, 07:13:58 PM EST

you mean jackboots n polish pat? - (boxley) - (6) - Feb. 28, 2003, 07:23:59 PM EST

Jesse ran for president? -NT - (Brandioch) - (5) - Feb. 28, 2003, 08:17:04 PM EST

nope, thats why I didnt vote in that race e(adds) - (boxley) - (4) - Feb. 28, 2003, 08:54:14 PM EST

You didn't vote for President? - (Brandioch) - (3) - Feb. 28, 2003, 10:23:46 PM EST

:-) not my fault but I'll bi*ch anyway:-) -NT - (boxley) - (2) - Feb. 28, 2003, 10:40:56 PM EST

This is the crux of our differences. - (Brandioch) - (1) - March 1, 2003, 08:23:51 AM EST

and I will add - (rcareaga) - March 1, 2003, 09:51:59 AM EST

Fap - (Silverlock) - (8) - Feb. 28, 2003, 10:26:12 AM EST

Okay, you name something Clinton did wrong - (boxley) - (7) - Feb. 28, 2003, 10:28:38 AM EST

Kiddie games? - (Silverlock) - Feb. 28, 2003, 10:33:57 AM EST

let's have at that undead horse, then! - (rcareaga) - (5) - March 1, 2003, 10:39:45 AM EST

Fair enough - (boxley) - (4) - March 1, 2003, 11:50:28 AM EST

Point to Boxley. :-) -NT - (Another Scott) - (3) - March 1, 2003, 11:56:48 AM EST

none needed and I expect rc to respond differently -NT - (boxley) - (2) - March 1, 2003, 12:15:34 PM EST

Re: none needed and I expect rc to respond differently - (rcareaga) - (1) - March 1, 2003, 01:12:26 PM EST

exactly what I got because you did not see my post first - (boxley) - March 1, 2003, 02:20:11 PM EST

George Will OpEd in WashPost today. - (Another Scott) - (2) - Feb. 28, 2003, 12:41:50 PM EST

Open letter to George Will - (jb4) - Feb. 28, 2003, 03:08:36 PM EST

From your link title: thought he meant Bush/Ashcroft Admin. -NT - (Ashton) - Feb. 28, 2003, 05:12:17 PM EST

iwethey.org

He's only an inch tall. He's a little short fat guy who eats way too much pizza.
124 ms