IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Regional/World Conflict Forum / Fucking amazing - it 1st revises its facts ...
Post #71,743
by dmarker
Picture of dmarker
12/31/02 12:26:09 PM
1/1/03 4:05:49 AM
Reply
New Fucking amazing - it 1st revises its facts ...
by effectively admiting that the 'Shanghai miracle' is real,

then it darts off onto an entirely different issue by quoting new material that relates to a new claim -- "that China's spectacular growth is all due to America" -- which is a totally different debate & not what this thread was about !!!

'Marlowe' whoever you really are - you are full of shit !!! - you just deployed the classic 'switch then bait' way of dodging a direct hit to your original statement & position.

You remind me of the student who could only learn facts when his teacher had to punch them into his head.

Expand Edited by dmarker Dec. 31, 2002, 12:27:33 PM EST
Expand Edited by dmarker Jan. 1, 2003, 04:05:49 AM EST
Expand All History
Post #71,930
by dmarker
Picture of dmarker
1/1/03 9:49:19 PM
Reply
New Crash & burn #1 - 'Marlowe' Where in your quoted link here
[link|http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/archives/2001/06/29/0000092042|http://www.taipeitim.../06/29/0000092042]

Is there **ANY** evidence or meaningful information that actually backs up your (or even that journalists implication) that the "Shanghi Miracle" is a mirage.

The only words in any way associated with your claim were the title ???

Is this your idea of published facts ???

Pray tell

Cheers

Doug Marker
Post #71,932
by dmarker
Picture of dmarker
1/1/03 9:53:30 PM
Reply
New Crash & Burn #2 - Where in this quoted link is there any ..

evidence what so ever, to back up your claim re the Shanghai Miracle ???

I couldn't find one line that related to the theme. ???. (even if I squint <grin>)

Cheers

Doug Marker
Post #71,933
by dmarker
Picture of dmarker
1/1/03 9:58:18 PM
Reply
New Crash & Burn #3 - Your quoted link #3 actually argues in

favour of the Shanghai Miracle but the article itself is in realiy someone's opinion about how threatening a growing & economically strong China is to US interests.

Hey buddy, we *weren't* debating that as an issue here !!!

You were supposed to be proving with published 'facts' that the "Shanghai Miracle" was a mirage. You have failed miserably in link to this quote

Cheers Doug Marker
Post #71,936
by dmarker
Picture of dmarker
1/1/03 10:08:59 PM
Reply
New Crash & Burn #4 - This link is not 'facts' it is subjective
opinion & out of date (as well as out of touch).

There are *no* quoted facts that relate in any way to China's economic resurgence of the past 20 years and China's position today as the world's most important exporter. There is *nothin* at all in this article that proves your contention "Shanghai Miracle Mirage".

All quoting this link has done for your case is to show that either you never understood the issue in the first place or you are so desperate to defened your questionable integrity that you will grasp at any thing.

I was going to deal with each of your links based on its merit but the actual content when read was such weak supporting material that it seems fruitless trashing the remainder of your links.

You know what this looked like ? - It looked like 'Marlowe' in desperation firstly attempted to change the debate to a different topic (China's staggering growth only achieved because of US), and to flood your post with many links & quotes that had nothing to do with the original point you got nailed on but to some people might have looked like you did some research.

I would expect better from a teenager in a high school debating team.

Cheers Doug Marker
     Shanghai miracle - (rcareaga) - (62) - Dec. 30, 2002, 11:14:14 PM EST
         did you get to Shanghai? - (boxley) - (6) - Dec. 30, 2002, 11:13:57 PM EST
             Re: did you get to Shanghai? - (rcareaga) - Dec. 30, 2002, 11:18:14 PM EST
             "Chairman Mao it aint" - (rcareaga) - (4) - Dec. 30, 2002, 11:20:10 PM EST
                 I nominate Marlowe as ambassador to China <grin> - (dmarker) - (3) - Dec. 31, 2002, 04:36:36 AM EST
                     Zooooom - - - (Ashton) - Dec. 31, 2002, 06:09:10 PM EST
                     Just noticed "Marlowe" is an anagram of "War Mole" -NT - (deSitter) - (1) - Dec. 31, 2002, 07:29:54 PM EST
                         I'm 100% satisfied Marlowe is our new Merlin <grin> ... - (dmarker) - Jan. 1, 2003, 01:12:21 AM EST
         The "Shanghai miracle" - (Silverlock) - (9) - Dec. 31, 2002, 02:51:16 AM EST
             Re: The "Shanghai miracle" - (dmarker) - Dec. 31, 2002, 04:07:31 AM EST
             China appears ready to put man in space ... - (dmarker) - (7) - Dec. 31, 2002, 08:54:11 AM EST
                 ...and on the moon - (rcareaga) - (1) - Dec. 31, 2002, 09:51:24 AM EST
                     Now that tops my news <grin>. Where will this end ? - (dmarker) - Dec. 31, 2002, 11:47:11 AM EST
                 Pics fine [and er.. deja vu] in Moz 1.01 -NT - (Ashton) - Dec. 31, 2002, 06:14:46 PM EST
                 Laundry and take-out for ISS :) -NT - (deSitter) - Dec. 31, 2002, 07:36:37 PM EST
                 Do you suppose they had some help... - (a6l6e6x) - (2) - Jan. 1, 2003, 03:02:52 PM EST
                     Re: Do you suppose they had some help... - (deSitter) - (1) - Jan. 1, 2003, 03:03:09 PM EST
                         So China can help N. Korea and the Pakistanis build ICBMs? - (a6l6e6x) - Jan. 1, 2003, 03:07:56 PM EST
         An antidote for irrational exuberance - (marlowe) - (44) - Dec. 31, 2002, 11:59:19 AM EST
             Fucking amazing - it 1st revises its facts ... - (dmarker) - (4) - Jan. 1, 2003, 04:05:49 AM EST
                 Crash & burn #1 - 'Marlowe' Where in your quoted link here - (dmarker) - Jan. 1, 2003, 09:49:19 PM EST
                 Crash & Burn #2 - Where in this quoted link is there any .. - (dmarker) - Jan. 1, 2003, 09:53:30 PM EST
                 Crash & Burn #3 - Your quoted link #3 actually argues in - (dmarker) - Jan. 1, 2003, 09:58:18 PM EST
                 Crash & Burn #4 - This link is not 'facts' it is subjective - (dmarker) - Jan. 1, 2003, 10:08:59 PM EST
             take all of your facts and convert them to truth - (boxley) - (2) - Dec. 31, 2002, 12:33:10 PM EST
                 No, not all that different. - (marlowe) - (1) - Jan. 2, 2003, 10:56:35 AM EST
                     SO THATS IT !!! - Marlowe is a Falun Gonger ! -NT - (dmarker) - Jan. 4, 2003, 10:37:08 AM EST
             Re: An antidote for irrational exuberance - (rcareaga) - (35) - Dec. 31, 2002, 09:02:34 PM EST
                 Chuckle....sometimes it's hard for us to remember - (Simon_Jester) - (2) - Dec. 31, 2002, 01:51:03 PM EST
                     Had that 'Energia' not suffered a Murican-style blow-up - (Ashton) - (1) - Dec. 31, 2002, 06:57:34 PM EST
                         Merlin/Marlowe/Whoever - brings to mind 'Cool Hand Luke' - (dmarker) - Dec. 31, 2002, 09:02:45 PM EST
                 Re: An antidote for irrational exuberance - (deSitter) - (31) - Dec. 31, 2002, 07:55:49 PM EST
                     rocket science - (rcareaga) - (30) - Dec. 31, 2002, 08:55:26 PM EST
                         Russians were desparate to show the US up. - (static) - (26) - Dec. 31, 2002, 09:09:27 PM EST
                             Russians messed up by allowing politics to override tech - (dmarker) - (25) - Dec. 31, 2002, 10:38:38 PM EST
                                 Let us hope, then... - (rcareaga) - (5) - Dec. 31, 2002, 11:09:31 PM EST
                                     Ah yes, McPhee - - and the decline of US amateur electronics - (Ashton) - (3) - Jan. 1, 2003, 06:16:04 AM EST
                                         Re: Ah yes, McPhee - (rcareaga) - (2) - Jan. 1, 2003, 04:04:30 PM EST
                                             Well.. Rhodes ain't too shabby in that department, either. - (Ashton) - (1) - Jan. 1, 2003, 07:32:28 PM EST
                                                 Rhodes not shabby at all - (rcareaga) - Jan. 1, 2003, 10:28:18 PM EST
                                     You mean like Timothy McVeigh :-) - (dmarker) - Jan. 1, 2003, 09:40:34 PM EST
                                 But we are losing it.. - (Ashton) - (9) - Jan. 1, 2003, 06:38:38 AM EST
                                     The world is no longer electronic - (Arkadiy) - (8) - Jan. 1, 2003, 02:24:58 PM EST
                                         The world! is analog(ue). - (Ashton) - (7) - Jan. 1, 2003, 08:15:10 PM EST
                                             Yes, alas, digitial does not actually exist . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (1) - Jan. 1, 2003, 08:34:33 PM EST
                                                 What matters is the precision necessary and possible - (Arkadiy) - Jan. 2, 2003, 11:59:44 AM EST
                                             Be careful saying "never". - (Another Scott) - (4) - Jan. 1, 2003, 08:48:57 PM EST
                                                 Methinks that "0 resistance" - (Ashton) - (3) - Jan. 1, 2003, 09:17:06 PM EST
                                                     Electrical resistance and *c* are different issues. - (Another Scott) - (2) - Jan. 1, 2003, 10:41:32 PM EST
                                                         Well... DC resistivity does seem bulletproof - (Ashton) - Jan. 1, 2003, 11:42:01 PM EST
                                                         A/C for runing a super conductor - (dmarker) - Jan. 2, 2003, 12:15:07 AM EST
                                 Re: Russians messed up by allowing politics to override tech - (rcareaga) - (8) - Jan. 1, 2003, 03:50:18 PM EST
                                     Yes - very good point. My interest is homebuilt h/c and ... - (dmarker) - (7) - Jan. 1, 2003, 09:37:05 PM EST
                                         Re: Yes - very good point. My interest is homebuilt h/c and - (rcareaga) - (6) - Jan. 1, 2003, 10:43:05 PM EST
                                             OOOooooo that was below the belt <grin> - (dmarker) - (5) - Jan. 1, 2003, 11:02:29 PM EST
                                                 Kinda OT: Insert tasteless joke here... - (Meerkat) - (4) - Jan. 1, 2003, 11:27:31 PM EST
                                                     Re: Kinda OT: Insert tasteless joke here... - (rcareaga) - (2) - Jan. 1, 2003, 11:41:55 PM EST
                                                         Don't know of her - was she somone who wouldn't let go - (dmarker) - (1) - Jan. 2, 2003, 12:33:35 AM EST
                                                             sic transit gloria mundi! - (rcareaga) - Jan. 2, 2003, 12:47:01 AM EST
                                                     Then there's Rod McKuen - for complete masslessness: - (Ashton) - Jan. 1, 2003, 11:49:08 PM EST
                         Re: rocket science - (deSitter) - Jan. 1, 2003, 01:40:36 PM EST
                         Russia has alway been good - (Arkadiy) - (1) - Jan. 1, 2003, 02:38:13 PM EST
                             Re: Russia has alway been good - (deSitter) - Jan. 1, 2003, 02:48:24 PM EST

+++ATH
118 ms