Post #71,508
12/30/02 12:02:28 PM
|
Re: Shades of gray: the last refuge of one who has no
And don't talk to me about creating, when you're defending the cause of those who would destroy our civilization. The first step to building a house that will last is wiping out the termite mounds on the site. That's just common sense. But I guess you're too sophisticated for that.
Really? I've said before I'm for hunting them down like the vermin they are and terminating with extreme prejudice. This need not, should not, involve a general war unless a specific state is directly responsible. Unfortunately, there is no "Terraq" to attack.
-drl
|
Post #71,521
12/30/02 1:58:39 PM
|
Hunting down who now?
Don't tell me you still buy into the the no state sponsorship theory.
This is not a law enforcement matter. This is a war.
Where's Abdul Rahman Yasin?
The reason I don't budge is I'm waiting for you to catch up.
"What must it feel like to lose an election to a retarded monkey?" - Andrew Sullivan
"The US party calls in mortar fire on the enemy positions. The UN party stands up, climbs over the lip of the trench, and recites Robert\ufffds Rules of Order as it approaches the machine-gun positions." - Lileks
[link|http://www.angelfire.com/ca3/marlowe/index.html|http://www.angelfire...arlowe/index.html]
With luck: [link|http://pascal.rockford.com:8888/SSK@jbf~W~x49RjZfyJwplqwurpNmg0PAgM/marlowe//|http://pascal.rockfo...mg0PAgM/marlowe//]
|
Post #71,530
12/30/02 3:11:47 PM
|
Re: Hunting down who now?
blockquote from the blockhead: This is not a law enforcement matter. This is a war. No dufus-boy, this is a law-enforcement matter pure and simple. War is for Lockheed and Martin-Marietta. Period. It's called corporate welfare; c.f. Vietnam War. Or do you declare war on the U.S. when Tim McVeigh blows up a government building? Didn't think so.... jb4
"They lead. They don't manage. The carrot always wins over the stick. Ask your horse. You can lead your horse to water, but you can't manage him to drink."
Richard Kerr, United Technologies Corporation, 1990
|
Post #71,535
12/30/02 3:47:23 PM
|
Good thing you're not running this war.
`Coz it is one. I'm happy that our current administration has its head out its ass regarding state sponsorship. It's a pity you don't, but that's your problem.
It's all too symptomatic of the cultivated ignorance around here that no one has dared attempt a reply to [link|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=70380|this].
Where's Abdul Rahman Yasin?
The reason I don't budge is I'm waiting for you to catch up.
"What must it feel like to lose an election to a retarded monkey?" - Andrew Sullivan
"The US party calls in mortar fire on the enemy positions. The UN party stands up, climbs over the lip of the trench, and recites Robert\ufffds Rules of Order as it approaches the machine-gun positions." - Lileks
[link|http://www.angelfire.com/ca3/marlowe/index.html|http://www.angelfire...arlowe/index.html]
With luck: [link|http://pascal.rockford.com:8888/SSK@jbf~W~x49RjZfyJwplqwurpNmg0PAgM/marlowe//|http://pascal.rockfo...mg0PAgM/marlowe//]
|
Post #71,539
12/30/02 4:04:37 PM
|
Respond to your obsession about Clinton?
You seem to be under the impression that you're making some kind of point by brining up mistakes made during Clinton's administration.
Why?
Is there anyone here who has voiced the opinion that Clinton didn't make any mistakes? I don't think so.
Rather, I have seen post after post of how he was poll-driven and how he happily bombed terrorist sites to distract the public from his sexual errors.
But you're obsessed with Clinton for some reason.
Maybe it is because he stomped Bush and you already know that the current Bush will be a one-term president also.
So you focus your limited intellect on pointing out mistakes Clinton made because you think it will, somehow, validate your faith in the current regime.
Bad news. Bush is fucking up the economy in a big way and no amount of war talk will get him re-elected.
It's the economy, stupid.
|
Post #71,563
12/30/02 5:48:26 PM
12/30/02 5:49:39 PM
|
The Maji has spoken!
Oh, yeah....Iraq sponsored the "attack on America".
Don't Bogart that joint, my friend...pass it over to me ('cuz it must be some mighty good shit!). Or is it that you just haven't been paying attention? Or can't read? or can't comprehend that which you do read? Or simply choose to ignore what ever facts don't fit into your preconcieved notions? (Now, there's a novel affliction, shared with the current Resident and his "administration". At least you're in...well, I was going to say "good company", but there is very little that is good about that "company"!)
jb4
"They lead. They don't manage. The carrot always wins over the stick. Ask your horse. You can lead your horse to water, but you can't manage him to drink."
Richard Kerr, United Technologies Corporation, 1990
Edited by jb4
Dec. 30, 2002, 05:49:39 PM EST
|
Post #71,634
12/30/02 11:03:47 PM
|
*Snort*
Don't know why, but the "good company" got me laughin'.
Why should we ask our military to die for cheap oil when the rest of us aren't even being asked to get better mileage?
-[link|http://www.workingforchange.com/article.cfm?itemid=14107|Molly Ivins]
|
Post #71,623
12/30/02 10:26:20 PM
|
Re: Hunting down who now?
Yes, it is a law enforcement matter, and what we need is a posse and a 42 gun salute from the Confederate battery at Fort Sumter, instead of another victorious Yankee army.
-drl
|
