Post #65,223
11/26/02 4:57:55 PM
|
No, I think you've phrased it correctly.
Average pre-natal care is statistically better in many other countries than in the US. Yep. But there are only a few countries that can have septuplets or even octuplets survive (for at least a while) and the US is one of them. Yep. Also, those who have nearly infinite resources (e.g. King Hussein of Jordan) commonly come to the US for terminal cancer care, etc. (though I don't know that we'd hear about it if they went to Switzerland instead). When you can afford to send the very best. But your examples go back to averages. And averages aren't a measure of what is best. When something goes wrong, and you have unlimited resources, where do you go? That is BEST.
|
Post #65,375
11/27/02 6:16:23 AM
|
Silly definition of BEST
"When something goes wrong, and you have unlimited resources, where do you go?"
Hmm.
Weird definition.
Certainly it is not best for me. Nor is it (I suspect) for you.
Our best bet would be to go somewhere where our resources would buy more care per Euro.
Which is not US for anyone with *limited* resources (which is practically everybody).
Technology is one thing - knowledge and know how are something else again.
Illustrative joke follows:
Man suffers from debilitating headaches and visits doctor after doctor - nothing seems to work - pills work for a short while but he can't function. Finally one doctor tells him there is a cure - but its rather drastic. The doctor concludes that his testicles are pressing against the base of his spine and causing the headaches. Being a crack surgeon, he recommends removal of the testicles. The guy is desperate and agrees.
On the way back from the hospital, his head is clear for the first time in months and he's feeling sort of optimistic. He passes a fine clothing store and decides to get a new suit to celebrate.
The guy in the store sizes him up by eyeball and says - you look like a 44 long - he grabs a jacket off the rack and guy slips it on. Its perfect! Pants? Sure - inseam is about a 34 he guesses, with a 36 waist - tries em on. Amazing - like custom made! Shirt? Yeah - perfect fit first time? Shoes? Why not - you look like an 11 - exactly so! The guy never guesses wrong. Finally he says - you've gone the whole way - how about some new underwear? "Great" the guys says - "I'd guess 38s". The guy smiles and shakes his head - nope, sorry, I take a 34. The salesman says that can't be right. But the guy insists - "I've worn a 34 since high school".
Finally in exasperation the salesman says - "You can't wear a 34. A 34 would press your testicles hard up against the base of your spine and give you one HELL of a headache!"
Its a silly joke, but it contains a grain of truth. The technology-focused doctor never thought about a lower tech solution. I suspect, that US doctors are all overly dependent on tech.
Anyhow, if I'm terminally ill - the US is about last on my list of places to get treated. I'd rather go somewhere that won't bankrupt me while they kill me.
I am out of the country for the duration of the Bush administration. Please leave a message and I'll get back to you when democracy returns.
|
Post #65,451
11/27/02 11:52:46 AM
|
No, that is the definition of "best".
Not "what you can afford" which seems to be where you're heading with this. If you can't afford the best, it is still the best. Our best bet would be to go somewhere where our resources would buy more care per Euro. So, when WHAT YOU CAN AFFORD isn't good enough.... You go somewhere where you can afford BETTER treatment. Now, if you have UNLIMITED resources, then you are NOT limited by what you can afford.
|
Post #65,452
11/27/02 11:56:50 AM
|
Hardly.
That is a definition of "best" in crisis intervention only.
Wouldn't it be >better< to not allow the healthcare issues get to that crisis?
You were born...and so you're free...so Happy Birthday! Laurie Anderson
[link|mailto:bepatient@aol.com|BePatient]
|
Post #65,456
11/27/02 12:30:42 PM
|
All parts of the elephant
But I grow weary - his definitions is wacked and I can't help him apparently.
I'm sure the view from his side of the argument is equally frustrating.
I (and you I think) take the position that the best care would keep a scratch from turning into massive sepsis by effective use of low tech (and cheap) means (basic cleansing, clean dressings, observation). This is the best outcome and hence the best care.
His view is, once you've got massive sepsis, the US doctors are more likely to pull you back from the brink of death (most likely with amputation of the affected limb, fancy blood filters, and extensive and elaborate drug regimes) than anyone else. I don't call that good care though and its only a tiny part of the picture. At one single data point, there is a spike in the graph. If you are really screwed up, certain stars might be able to do better than anyone else.
I think its fallacious though. If Michael Jordan came to France to play basketball professionally, does that mean that France is now the best in basketball because he brings a million coconuts with him? Er.... you know what I mean.
So I think this argument is exhausted and we just don't agree on what "best" is.
Next topic.
I am out of the country for the duration of the Bush administration. Please leave a message and I'll get back to you when democracy returns.
|
Post #65,554
11/27/02 7:32:13 PM
|
Because my definition does not agree with your opinion....
When you start calculating the AVERAGE of anything, then you're taking the AVERAGE.
Average life expectency, etc.
The average is not the best.
You can have the highest average. But that isn't the best.
|
Post #65,581
11/27/02 11:41:23 PM
|
Lighten up
The US's health system may have the "best" in some areas. Not all. Stop trying to infer that since we have the best in some aspect, we have the best in all. A cheap rhetorical device.
Why should we ask our military to die for cheap oil when the rest of us aren't even being asked to get better mileage? -[link|http://www.workingforchange.com/article.cfm?itemid=14107|Molly Ivins]
|
Post #65,586
11/27/02 11:55:42 PM
|
never let a cheap rhetorical device hold you back :-)
will work for cash and other incentives [link|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html|skill set]
Opera was the television of the nineteenth century:loud, vulgar and garish with plots that could only be called infantile. "Pendergast"
|
Post #65,623
11/28/02 11:23:31 AM
|
He never does ;-)
You were born...and so you're free...so Happy Birthday! Laurie Anderson
[link|mailto:bepatient@aol.com|BePatient]
|