And that person is entitled to that continuing care and that lawsuit would not be spurious. In other words...a good "reform" of the system would allow these claims to still be upheld. Reform is centered around non-economic damages. The damages you described are certainly economic damages.
But...it seems that you think that I'm only out to protect the big, key corporate interests.
Funny...I thought it might be nice to have a family doctor...instead of one appointed by the only people left that can afford to hire them...big corporations...so I'm finding your knee-jerk reaction to your "perception" of my position to be just on the other side of hysterical...let alone completely wrong.