Health care is a commodity. It's purpose is (theoritically) to keep the populace healthy.
Commodity:
1. Something useful that can be turned to commercial or other advantage: \ufffdLeft-handed, power-hitting third basemen are a rare commodity in the big leagues\ufffd (Steve Guiremand).
2. An article of trade or commerce, especially an agricultural or mining product that can be processed and resold.
3. Advantage; benefit.
Somehow, I don't see "health care" coming under definitions #1 or #2. Maybe #3, but that includes anything not detrimental.
If the populace can not access this health care for whatever reason, it is ineffectual.
But they can. They can buy aspirin and cough syrup at any corner store.
Just because it won best-of-show for a couple things, trauma, specific surgical proceedures, come to mind, does not mean that it is adequate as a whole.
Again, "best" is not "average".
If you want to argue that the purpose of health care is *NOT* to keep the populace healthy, you can argue by yourself.
Cute.
Anyway, back to the coconuts.
Nation B has more coconuts. Because the majority of individuals in that nation have less coconut than the individuals in Nation A does not mean that Nation B has fewer coconuts.
That is the flaw in your logic.
You're trying to say that unless EVERYONE in a nation has the BEST health care, that nation does NOT have the BEST health care.
So, Nation B does not have the most coconuts because everyone doesn't have more coconuts than everyone in Nation A.
And that is the different between BEST and AVERAGE.