I seem to recall, no I'm not doing the research, that his losses are associated with casino/hotel investments. He got many other people to invest in it. The loss wasn't even his money.
But the contracts were written in such a manner that if there was a loss he got to claim it. Which meant other people's losses have been funding his tax abatements for the last 20 years.
But the contracts were written in such a manner that if there was a loss he got to claim it. Which meant other people's losses have been funding his tax abatements for the last 20 years.