IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Open Forum / Not Fox News, Fox Network
Post #337,138
by lincoln
12/11/10 7:38:21 PM
Reply
New Not Fox News, Fox Network
There is a difference...




"Chicago to my mind was the only place to be. ... I above all liked the city because it was filled with people all a-bustle, and the clatter of hooves and carriages, and with delivery wagons and drays and peddlers and the boom and clank of freight trains. And when those black clouds came sailing in from the west, pouring thunderstorms upon us so that you couldn't hear the cries or curses of humankind, I liked that best of all. Chicago could stand up to the worst God had to offer. I understood why it was built--a place for trade, of course, with railroads and ships and so on, but mostly to give all of us a magnitude of defiance that is not provided by one house on the plains. And the plains is where those storms come from."

-- E.L. Doctorow
Post #337,149
by boxley
12/11/10 8:26:28 PM
Reply
New bookmarked, thanks
Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free American and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 55 years. meep
     Truer colors, perhaps? - (beepster) - (70) - Dec. 6, 2010, 09:27:13 AM EST
         What, you mean he's defending himself? What a surprise -NT - (drook) - (26) - Dec. 6, 2010, 10:35:52 AM EST
             Ah, I see. At any cost - (beepster) - (24) - Dec. 6, 2010, 10:45:36 AM EST
                 I'll try, once - (drook) - (22) - Dec. 6, 2010, 11:20:29 AM EST
                     Thats not my argument at all. - (beepster) - (21) - Dec. 6, 2010, 11:39:29 AM EST
                         no, he is just a well known leaker - (boxley) - Dec. 6, 2010, 12:01:43 PM EST
                         Why do you trust him less than the government? - (drook) - (19) - Dec. 6, 2010, 12:44:35 PM EST
                             Excuse me? - (beepster) - (18) - Dec. 6, 2010, 03:52:48 PM EST
                                 Just this - (drook) - (17) - Dec. 6, 2010, 07:45:10 PM EST
                                     That you know of... - (beepster) - (16) - Dec. 7, 2010, 06:32:57 AM EST
                                         Theoreticals VS actuals - (crazy) - (15) - Dec. 7, 2010, 07:38:19 AM EST
                                             You are back to binary argument - (beepster) - (14) - Dec. 7, 2010, 08:58:18 AM EST
                                                 It IS binary - (crazy) - (1) - Dec. 7, 2010, 10:13:20 AM EST
                                                     No, I don't and no its not. - (beepster) - Dec. 7, 2010, 02:48:37 PM EST
                                                 Ahh, we agree - (drook) - (11) - Dec. 7, 2010, 12:15:51 PM EST
                                                     Not quite. - (beepster) - (10) - Dec. 7, 2010, 02:50:49 PM EST
                                                         You're strawmanning a bit there, Beep - (jake123) - (7) - Dec. 7, 2010, 03:08:39 PM EST
                                                             Threat made - (beepster) - (6) - Dec. 7, 2010, 03:22:43 PM EST
                                                                 Is that any different from what's happening now? - (jake123) - (5) - Dec. 7, 2010, 03:44:35 PM EST
                                                                     a lot of info is for sale - (boxley) - Dec. 7, 2010, 04:04:19 PM EST
                                                                     Lest I continue to have to repeat myself... - (beepster) - (3) - Dec. 7, 2010, 05:18:15 PM EST
                                                                         legitimate double standards - (crazy) - (2) - Dec. 9, 2010, 03:44:54 AM EST
                                                                             change legitimate to real then...if it suits you -NT - (beepster) - (1) - Dec. 9, 2010, 03:16:13 PM EST
                                                                                 An acceptable response - (crazy) - Dec. 9, 2010, 06:38:33 PM EST
                                                         BeeP uses a strawman ... news at 11 - (drook) - (1) - Dec. 7, 2010, 03:26:25 PM EST
                                                             Yep, - (beepster) - Dec. 7, 2010, 03:27:44 PM EST
                 Re: Ah, I see. At any cost. | this-all has been >Novelized< - (Ashton) - Dec. 8, 2010, 01:40:48 AM EST
             There are ALWAYS checks and balances - (mhuber) - Dec. 6, 2010, 01:48:23 PM EST
         try defense -NT - (boxley) - Dec. 6, 2010, 10:45:42 AM EST
         From the comments, interesting point - (crazy) - (1) - Dec. 6, 2010, 02:10:38 PM EST
             unanticipated side effects -NT - (boxley) - Dec. 6, 2010, 02:39:52 PM EST
         what law did he break? - (boxley) - (34) - Dec. 6, 2010, 02:50:03 PM EST
             Receipt of stolen goods? Dunno. There's always "conspiracy". -NT - (Another Scott) - (29) - Dec. 6, 2010, 05:28:08 PM EST
                 Same thing that convicted Steve Rosen - (beepster) - (28) - Dec. 6, 2010, 06:15:11 PM EST
                     So, we have officially declared war then? - (folkert) - (27) - Dec. 6, 2010, 07:11:08 PM EST
                         You should read it... - (beepster) - (26) - Dec. 6, 2010, 07:37:01 PM EST
                             But it *DOES* require intent. -NT - (folkert) - (25) - Dec. 7, 2010, 03:35:54 AM EST
                                 Can you tell me his intent? - (folkert) - (24) - Dec. 8, 2010, 08:28:41 AM EST
                                     Wait, let me weep. - (beepster) - (23) - Dec. 8, 2010, 11:08:38 AM EST
                                         Is it OK that the NYT has reprinted what he released? - (drook) - (19) - Dec. 8, 2010, 11:25:23 AM EST
                                             Where did they get it? - (beepster) - (18) - Dec. 8, 2010, 11:50:53 AM EST
                                                 Huh? - (drook) - (17) - Dec. 8, 2010, 12:52:09 PM EST
                                                     Re: Huh? - (beepster) - (16) - Dec. 8, 2010, 06:21:06 PM EST
                                                         The original sin... - (folkert) - (15) - Dec. 8, 2010, 08:05:28 PM EST
                                                             So.. - (beepster) - (14) - Dec. 9, 2010, 01:46:19 AM EST
                                                                 "Convinced"? - (crazy) - (9) - Dec. 9, 2010, 03:57:25 AM EST
                                                                     Nah, the first one is pretty close - (beepster) - (8) - Dec. 9, 2010, 03:17:31 PM EST
                                                                         And we all know - (crazy) - (7) - Dec. 9, 2010, 06:48:19 PM EST
                                                                             Okee dokee. -NT - (beepster) - (5) - Dec. 9, 2010, 06:52:02 PM EST
                                                                                 Answer me on question. - (folkert) - (4) - Dec. 9, 2010, 08:33:02 PM EST
                                                                                     Yes dear. - (beepster) - (2) - Dec. 10, 2010, 05:38:01 AM EST
                                                                                         People seem to miss your point pretty frequently - (drook) - (1) - Dec. 10, 2010, 01:43:10 PM EST
                                                                                             Too busy with hero worship, perhaps? -NT - (beepster) - Dec. 11, 2010, 01:10:39 PM EST
                                                                                     Mouse gone haywire...dupe -NT - (beepster) - Dec. 10, 2010, 05:38:30 AM EST
                                                                             Think you've got it - (Ashton) - Dec. 11, 2010, 02:56:58 AM EST
                                                                 Re: So.. - (lincoln) - (3) - Dec. 9, 2010, 08:51:40 PM EST
                                                                     chuckle - (beepster) - (2) - Dec. 10, 2010, 05:42:16 AM EST
                                                                         Not Fox News, Fox Network - (lincoln) - (1) - Dec. 11, 2010, 07:38:21 PM EST
                                                                             bookmarked, thanks -NT - (boxley) - Dec. 11, 2010, 08:26:28 PM EST
                                         Again... you skipped the question. - (folkert) - (2) - Dec. 8, 2010, 05:36:58 PM EST
                                             didnt skip. - (beepster) - (1) - Dec. 8, 2010, 06:23:28 PM EST
                                                 If anyone should be prosecuted... - (folkert) - Dec. 8, 2010, 08:04:41 PM EST
             Good question - (jay) - (3) - Dec. 7, 2010, 10:53:43 AM EST
                 Assange is the equivelant of the NYT - (boxley) - (2) - Dec. 7, 2010, 11:11:07 AM EST
                     You say that like it's a bad thing - (drook) - (1) - Dec. 7, 2010, 12:15:36 PM EST
                         "I" didnt say anything - (boxley) - Dec. 7, 2010, 12:29:04 PM EST
         Counterpoint. - (Another Scott) - (4) - Dec. 7, 2010, 10:59:13 PM EST
             +6 -- Scale & Relativity! - (Ashton) - (3) - Dec. 8, 2010, 02:16:19 AM EST
                 Doubt it matters - (crazy) - (2) - Dec. 9, 2010, 04:17:11 AM EST
                     Pretty close... - (beepster) - (1) - Dec. 9, 2010, 03:19:16 PM EST
                         Oh, that's easy - (crazy) - Dec. 9, 2010, 06:57:01 PM EST

Sittin' on the Group W bench.
748 ms