And we all know
that we pick and choose the laws we adhere to.
At least some of us do.
Based on our own perceived likelyhood of harm of the act, combined with harm of getting caught, and then roll the dice.
And we certainly look at the law of other countries with a mixture of awe and contempt.
So you feel that a non US citizen should adhere to some type of ruleset that makes him beholden to US laws, laws that we don't even enforce against our own citizens? And in this case, they still haven't come up with a law he's broken. So now non-US citizens have to be concerned about the random political implications of their acts when a random powerful person can cause them indirect damage through back channels.
Holy shit. This sounds like a scenario that we should document and send to wikileaks. It's an obvious case of power abuse.
Beep, this is the exact reason what he is doing is important and good. Thanks for clarifying it for me.
