Okee dokee.

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #337,020 by beepster 12/9/10 6:52:02 PM Reply	Okee dokee. Sure, understanding today's complex world of the future is a little like having bees live in your head. But...there they are.
Post #337,029 by folkert 12/9/10 8:33:02 PM Reply	Answer me on question. Are you familiar with the "Pentagon Papers" from 1971?
Post #337,073 by beepster 12/10/10 5:38:01 AM Reply	Yes dear. But you appear to still be missing my point if you think this is relevant. Sure, understanding today's complex world of the future is a little like having bees live in your head. But...there they are.
Post #337,097 by drook 12/10/10 1:43:10 PM Reply	People seem to miss your point pretty frequently Why do you think that is? -- Drew
Post #337,129 by beepster 12/11/10 1:10:39 PM Reply	Too busy with hero worship, perhaps? Sure, understanding today's complex world of the future is a little like having bees live in your head. But...there they are.
Post #337,074 by beepster 12/10/10 5:38:02 AM 12/10/10 5:38:30 AM Reply	Mouse gone haywire...dupe Sure, understanding today's complex world of the future is a little like having bees live in your head. But...there they are. Edited by beepster Dec. 10, 2010, 05:38:30 AM EST Expand All History

Truer colors, perhaps? - (beepster) - (70) - Dec. 6, 2010, 09:27:13 AM EST

What, you mean he's defending himself? What a surprise -NT - (drook) - (26) - Dec. 6, 2010, 10:35:52 AM EST

Ah, I see. At any cost - (beepster) - (24) - Dec. 6, 2010, 10:45:36 AM EST

I'll try, once - (drook) - (22) - Dec. 6, 2010, 11:20:29 AM EST

Thats not my argument at all. - (beepster) - (21) - Dec. 6, 2010, 11:39:29 AM EST

no, he is just a well known leaker - (boxley) - Dec. 6, 2010, 12:01:43 PM EST

Why do you trust him less than the government? - (drook) - (19) - Dec. 6, 2010, 12:44:35 PM EST

Excuse me? - (beepster) - (18) - Dec. 6, 2010, 03:52:48 PM EST

Just this - (drook) - (17) - Dec. 6, 2010, 07:45:10 PM EST

That you know of... - (beepster) - (16) - Dec. 7, 2010, 06:32:57 AM EST

Theoreticals VS actuals - (crazy) - (15) - Dec. 7, 2010, 07:38:19 AM EST

You are back to binary argument - (beepster) - (14) - Dec. 7, 2010, 08:58:18 AM EST

It IS binary - (crazy) - (1) - Dec. 7, 2010, 10:13:20 AM EST

No, I don't and no its not. - (beepster) - Dec. 7, 2010, 02:48:37 PM EST

Ahh, we agree - (drook) - (11) - Dec. 7, 2010, 12:15:51 PM EST

Not quite. - (beepster) - (10) - Dec. 7, 2010, 02:50:49 PM EST

You're strawmanning a bit there, Beep - (jake123) - (7) - Dec. 7, 2010, 03:08:39 PM EST

Threat made - (beepster) - (6) - Dec. 7, 2010, 03:22:43 PM EST

Is that any different from what's happening now? - (jake123) - (5) - Dec. 7, 2010, 03:44:35 PM EST

a lot of info is for sale - (boxley) - Dec. 7, 2010, 04:04:19 PM EST

Lest I continue to have to repeat myself... - (beepster) - (3) - Dec. 7, 2010, 05:18:15 PM EST

legitimate double standards - (crazy) - (2) - Dec. 9, 2010, 03:44:54 AM EST

change legitimate to real then...if it suits you -NT - (beepster) - (1) - Dec. 9, 2010, 03:16:13 PM EST

An acceptable response - (crazy) - Dec. 9, 2010, 06:38:33 PM EST

BeeP uses a strawman ... news at 11 - (drook) - (1) - Dec. 7, 2010, 03:26:25 PM EST

Yep, - (beepster) - Dec. 7, 2010, 03:27:44 PM EST

Re: Ah, I see. At any cost. | this-all has been >Novelized< - (Ashton) - Dec. 8, 2010, 01:40:48 AM EST

There are ALWAYS checks and balances - (mhuber) - Dec. 6, 2010, 01:48:23 PM EST

try defense -NT - (boxley) - Dec. 6, 2010, 10:45:42 AM EST

From the comments, interesting point - (crazy) - (1) - Dec. 6, 2010, 02:10:38 PM EST

unanticipated side effects -NT - (boxley) - Dec. 6, 2010, 02:39:52 PM EST

what law did he break? - (boxley) - (34) - Dec. 6, 2010, 02:50:03 PM EST

Receipt of stolen goods? Dunno. There's always "conspiracy". -NT - (Another Scott) - (29) - Dec. 6, 2010, 05:28:08 PM EST

Same thing that convicted Steve Rosen - (beepster) - (28) - Dec. 6, 2010, 06:15:11 PM EST

So, we have officially declared war then? - (folkert) - (27) - Dec. 6, 2010, 07:11:08 PM EST

You should read it... - (beepster) - (26) - Dec. 6, 2010, 07:37:01 PM EST

But it *DOES* require intent. -NT - (folkert) - (25) - Dec. 7, 2010, 03:35:54 AM EST

Can you tell me his intent? - (folkert) - (24) - Dec. 8, 2010, 08:28:41 AM EST

Wait, let me weep. - (beepster) - (23) - Dec. 8, 2010, 11:08:38 AM EST

Is it OK that the NYT has reprinted what he released? - (drook) - (19) - Dec. 8, 2010, 11:25:23 AM EST

Where did they get it? - (beepster) - (18) - Dec. 8, 2010, 11:50:53 AM EST

Huh? - (drook) - (17) - Dec. 8, 2010, 12:52:09 PM EST

Re: Huh? - (beepster) - (16) - Dec. 8, 2010, 06:21:06 PM EST

The original sin... - (folkert) - (15) - Dec. 8, 2010, 08:05:28 PM EST

So.. - (beepster) - (14) - Dec. 9, 2010, 01:46:19 AM EST

"Convinced"? - (crazy) - (9) - Dec. 9, 2010, 03:57:25 AM EST

Nah, the first one is pretty close - (beepster) - (8) - Dec. 9, 2010, 03:17:31 PM EST

And we all know - (crazy) - (7) - Dec. 9, 2010, 06:48:19 PM EST

Okee dokee. -NT - (beepster) - (5) - Dec. 9, 2010, 06:52:02 PM EST

Answer me on question. - (folkert) - (4) - Dec. 9, 2010, 08:33:02 PM EST

Yes dear. - (beepster) - (2) - Dec. 10, 2010, 05:38:01 AM EST

People seem to miss your point pretty frequently - (drook) - (1) - Dec. 10, 2010, 01:43:10 PM EST

Too busy with hero worship, perhaps? -NT - (beepster) - Dec. 11, 2010, 01:10:39 PM EST

Mouse gone haywire...dupe -NT - (beepster) - Dec. 10, 2010, 05:38:30 AM EST

Think you've got it - (Ashton) - Dec. 11, 2010, 02:56:58 AM EST

Re: So.. - (lincoln) - (3) - Dec. 9, 2010, 08:51:40 PM EST

chuckle - (beepster) - (2) - Dec. 10, 2010, 05:42:16 AM EST

Not Fox News, Fox Network - (lincoln) - (1) - Dec. 11, 2010, 07:38:21 PM EST

bookmarked, thanks -NT - (boxley) - Dec. 11, 2010, 08:26:28 PM EST

Again... you skipped the question. - (folkert) - (2) - Dec. 8, 2010, 05:36:58 PM EST

didnt skip. - (beepster) - (1) - Dec. 8, 2010, 06:23:28 PM EST

If anyone should be prosecuted... - (folkert) - Dec. 8, 2010, 08:04:41 PM EST

Good question - (jay) - (3) - Dec. 7, 2010, 10:53:43 AM EST

Assange is the equivelant of the NYT - (boxley) - (2) - Dec. 7, 2010, 11:11:07 AM EST

You say that like it's a bad thing - (drook) - (1) - Dec. 7, 2010, 12:15:36 PM EST

"I" didnt say anything - (boxley) - Dec. 7, 2010, 12:29:04 PM EST

Counterpoint. - (Another Scott) - (4) - Dec. 7, 2010, 10:59:13 PM EST

+6 -- Scale & Relativity! - (Ashton) - (3) - Dec. 8, 2010, 02:16:19 AM EST

Doubt it matters - (crazy) - (2) - Dec. 9, 2010, 04:17:11 AM EST

Pretty close... - (beepster) - (1) - Dec. 9, 2010, 03:19:16 PM EST

Oh, that's easy - (crazy) - Dec. 9, 2010, 06:57:01 PM EST

iwethey.org

Thank GOD you finished that sentence.
87 ms