IWETHEY v. 0.3.0
|
TODO
1,095 registered users | 0
active users
| 0 LpH |
Statistics
Login
|
Create New User
Welcome to IWETHEY!
IWETHEY Home
/
IWETHEY Board
/
Open Forum
/
An acceptable response
Post #337,017
by
crazy
12/9/10 6:38:33 PM
Reply
An acceptable response
We live in the real world after all.
Truer colors, perhaps?
- (
beepster
)
- (70)
- Dec. 6, 2010, 09:27:13 AM EST
What, you mean he's defending himself? What a surprise
-NT
- (
drook
)
- (26)
- Dec. 6, 2010, 10:35:52 AM EST
Ah, I see. At any cost
- (
beepster
)
- (24)
- Dec. 6, 2010, 10:45:36 AM EST
I'll try, once
- (
drook
)
- (22)
- Dec. 6, 2010, 11:20:29 AM EST
Thats not my argument at all.
- (
beepster
)
- (21)
- Dec. 6, 2010, 11:39:29 AM EST
no, he is just a well known leaker
- (
boxley
)
- Dec. 6, 2010, 12:01:43 PM EST
Why do you trust him less than the government?
- (
drook
)
- (19)
- Dec. 6, 2010, 12:44:35 PM EST
Excuse me?
- (
beepster
)
- (18)
- Dec. 6, 2010, 03:52:48 PM EST
Just this
- (
drook
)
- (17)
- Dec. 6, 2010, 07:45:10 PM EST
That you know of...
- (
beepster
)
- (16)
- Dec. 7, 2010, 06:32:57 AM EST
Theoreticals VS actuals
- (
crazy
)
- (15)
- Dec. 7, 2010, 07:38:19 AM EST
You are back to binary argument
- (
beepster
)
- (14)
- Dec. 7, 2010, 08:58:18 AM EST
It IS binary
- (
crazy
)
- (1)
- Dec. 7, 2010, 10:13:20 AM EST
No, I don't and no its not.
- (
beepster
)
- Dec. 7, 2010, 02:48:37 PM EST
Ahh, we agree
- (
drook
)
- (11)
- Dec. 7, 2010, 12:15:51 PM EST
Not quite.
- (
beepster
)
- (10)
- Dec. 7, 2010, 02:50:49 PM EST
You're strawmanning a bit there, Beep
- (
jake123
)
- (7)
- Dec. 7, 2010, 03:08:39 PM EST
Threat made
- (
beepster
)
- (6)
- Dec. 7, 2010, 03:22:43 PM EST
Is that any different from what's happening now?
- (
jake123
)
- (5)
- Dec. 7, 2010, 03:44:35 PM EST
a lot of info is for sale
- (
boxley
)
- Dec. 7, 2010, 04:04:19 PM EST
Lest I continue to have to repeat myself...
- (
beepster
)
- (3)
- Dec. 7, 2010, 05:18:15 PM EST
legitimate double standards
- (
crazy
)
- (2)
- Dec. 9, 2010, 03:44:54 AM EST
change legitimate to real then...if it suits you
-NT
- (
beepster
)
- (1)
- Dec. 9, 2010, 03:16:13 PM EST
An acceptable response
- (
crazy
)
- Dec. 9, 2010, 06:38:33 PM EST
BeeP uses a strawman ... news at 11
- (
drook
)
- (1)
- Dec. 7, 2010, 03:26:25 PM EST
Yep,
- (
beepster
)
- Dec. 7, 2010, 03:27:44 PM EST
Re: Ah, I see. At any cost. | this-all has been >Novelized<
- (
Ashton
)
- Dec. 8, 2010, 01:40:48 AM EST
There are ALWAYS checks and balances
- (
mhuber
)
- Dec. 6, 2010, 01:48:23 PM EST
try defense
-NT
- (
boxley
)
- Dec. 6, 2010, 10:45:42 AM EST
From the comments, interesting point
- (
crazy
)
- (1)
- Dec. 6, 2010, 02:10:38 PM EST
unanticipated side effects
-NT
- (
boxley
)
- Dec. 6, 2010, 02:39:52 PM EST
what law did he break?
- (
boxley
)
- (34)
- Dec. 6, 2010, 02:50:03 PM EST
Receipt of stolen goods? Dunno. There's always "conspiracy".
-NT
- (
Another Scott
)
- (29)
- Dec. 6, 2010, 05:28:08 PM EST
Same thing that convicted Steve Rosen
- (
beepster
)
- (28)
- Dec. 6, 2010, 06:15:11 PM EST
So, we have officially declared war then?
- (
folkert
)
- (27)
- Dec. 6, 2010, 07:11:08 PM EST
You should read it...
- (
beepster
)
- (26)
- Dec. 6, 2010, 07:37:01 PM EST
But it *DOES* require intent.
-NT
- (
folkert
)
- (25)
- Dec. 7, 2010, 03:35:54 AM EST
Can you tell me his intent?
- (
folkert
)
- (24)
- Dec. 8, 2010, 08:28:41 AM EST
Wait, let me weep.
- (
beepster
)
- (23)
- Dec. 8, 2010, 11:08:38 AM EST
Is it OK that the NYT has reprinted what he released?
- (
drook
)
- (19)
- Dec. 8, 2010, 11:25:23 AM EST
Where did they get it?
- (
beepster
)
- (18)
- Dec. 8, 2010, 11:50:53 AM EST
Huh?
- (
drook
)
- (17)
- Dec. 8, 2010, 12:52:09 PM EST
Re: Huh?
- (
beepster
)
- (16)
- Dec. 8, 2010, 06:21:06 PM EST
The original sin...
- (
folkert
)
- (15)
- Dec. 8, 2010, 08:05:28 PM EST
So..
- (
beepster
)
- (14)
- Dec. 9, 2010, 01:46:19 AM EST
"Convinced"?
- (
crazy
)
- (9)
- Dec. 9, 2010, 03:57:25 AM EST
Nah, the first one is pretty close
- (
beepster
)
- (8)
- Dec. 9, 2010, 03:17:31 PM EST
And we all know
- (
crazy
)
- (7)
- Dec. 9, 2010, 06:48:19 PM EST
Okee dokee.
-NT
- (
beepster
)
- (5)
- Dec. 9, 2010, 06:52:02 PM EST
Answer me on question.
- (
folkert
)
- (4)
- Dec. 9, 2010, 08:33:02 PM EST
Yes dear.
- (
beepster
)
- (2)
- Dec. 10, 2010, 05:38:01 AM EST
People seem to miss your point pretty frequently
- (
drook
)
- (1)
- Dec. 10, 2010, 01:43:10 PM EST
Too busy with hero worship, perhaps?
-NT
- (
beepster
)
- Dec. 11, 2010, 01:10:39 PM EST
Mouse gone haywire...dupe
-NT
- (
beepster
)
- Dec. 10, 2010, 05:38:30 AM EST
Think you've got it
- (
Ashton
)
- Dec. 11, 2010, 02:56:58 AM EST
Re: So..
- (
lincoln
)
- (3)
- Dec. 9, 2010, 08:51:40 PM EST
chuckle
- (
beepster
)
- (2)
- Dec. 10, 2010, 05:42:16 AM EST
Not Fox News, Fox Network
- (
lincoln
)
- (1)
- Dec. 11, 2010, 07:38:21 PM EST
bookmarked, thanks
-NT
- (
boxley
)
- Dec. 11, 2010, 08:26:28 PM EST
Again... you skipped the question.
- (
folkert
)
- (2)
- Dec. 8, 2010, 05:36:58 PM EST
didnt skip.
- (
beepster
)
- (1)
- Dec. 8, 2010, 06:23:28 PM EST
If anyone should be prosecuted...
- (
folkert
)
- Dec. 8, 2010, 08:04:41 PM EST
Good question
- (
jay
)
- (3)
- Dec. 7, 2010, 10:53:43 AM EST
Assange is the equivelant of the NYT
- (
boxley
)
- (2)
- Dec. 7, 2010, 11:11:07 AM EST
You say that like it's a bad thing
- (
drook
)
- (1)
- Dec. 7, 2010, 12:15:36 PM EST
"I" didnt say anything
- (
boxley
)
- Dec. 7, 2010, 12:29:04 PM EST
Counterpoint.
- (
Another Scott
)
- (4)
- Dec. 7, 2010, 10:59:13 PM EST
+6 -- Scale & Relativity!
- (
Ashton
)
- (3)
- Dec. 8, 2010, 02:16:19 AM EST
Doubt it matters
- (
crazy
)
- (2)
- Dec. 9, 2010, 04:17:11 AM EST
Pretty close...
- (
beepster
)
- (1)
- Dec. 9, 2010, 03:19:16 PM EST
Oh, that's easy
- (
crazy
)
- Dec. 9, 2010, 06:57:01 PM EST
i
we
they
.org
LRPD Who Must Be Obeyed.
188 ms