What a nightmare.

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #295,125 by Another Scott 10/25/07 10:55:10 PM Reply	What a nightmare. I assume you've checked Pete Norloff's site for the fixes? If it's available and OS/2 related, he should have it. [link\|http://www.os2bbs.com/download/index.html\|http://www.os2bbs.co...wnload/index.html] (Note you may need to use Telnet to download the files if you're not a subscriber. Instructions are there.) I keep hoping that Virtualization will make it possible for people to keep running OS/2 apps without worrying about drivers or special networking mojo, but it sounds like that's too much to hope for. Good luck. Cheers, Scott.
Post #295,128 by Andrew Grygus 10/25/07 11:16:15 PM Reply	No, it's not to be found there. Problem is, IBM released the TCP/IP upgrade for distribution then immediately declared that was a mistake, withdrew it, demanded it not be distributed, put a price tag on it and sold it for awhile, then it became unavailable at any price. [link\|http://www.aaxnet.com\|AAx]
Post #295,308 by n3jja 10/29/07 12:25:50 PM Reply	What version of TCP/IP stack?
Post #295,309 by Andrew Grygus 10/29/07 1:59:35 PM Reply	The stack isn't the problem part . . . . . since stacks higher than 5.12.2 (fixpack 15 level) are easily downloadable from IBM - they just won't work right without the rest of the upgrade. The package "IBM TCP/IP for Warp" to go along with the stack so it works right has to be 4.1 or 4.3. Fixpack 15 leaves it at 4.0. [link\|http://www.aaxnet.com\|AAx]
Post #295,311 by n3jja 10/29/07 2:31:46 PM Reply	check your email to continue discussion. ;-)
Post #295,320 by Andrew Grygus 10/29/07 5:59:38 PM Reply	Reply sent. [link\|http://www.aaxnet.com\|AAx]

The horrors of Open Office - (Andrew Grygus) - (23) - Oct. 25, 2007, 10:40:05 PM EDT

What a nightmare. - (Another Scott) - (5) - Oct. 25, 2007, 10:55:10 PM EDT

No, it's not to be found there. - (Andrew Grygus) - (4) - Oct. 25, 2007, 11:16:15 PM EDT

What version of TCP/IP stack? -NT - (n3jja) - (3) - Oct. 29, 2007, 12:25:50 PM EDT

The stack isn't the problem part . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (2) - Oct. 29, 2007, 01:59:35 PM EDT

check your email to continue discussion. ;-) -NT - (n3jja) - (1) - Oct. 29, 2007, 02:31:46 PM EDT

Reply sent. -NT - (Andrew Grygus) - Oct. 29, 2007, 05:59:38 PM EDT

why on earth is an office tool tied to an IP stack? -NT - (boxley) - (9) - Oct. 26, 2007, 09:54:50 AM EDT

Ain't got a clue . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (1) - Oct. 26, 2007, 12:21:19 PM EDT

hmmm, any way to make it think that it found it? - (boxley) - Oct. 26, 2007, 12:40:32 PM EDT

That's what *she* said :-D -NT - (imqwerky) - Oct. 26, 2007, 01:04:34 PM EDT

Why on earth is an office tied to OS/2? ;) -NT - (Meerkat) - (5) - Oct. 26, 2007, 07:38:32 PM EDT

Because . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (4) - Oct. 26, 2007, 08:13:06 PM EDT

Could you drop a nix server in? - (bepatient) - (3) - Oct. 26, 2007, 08:37:19 PM EDT

He already has a Linux server . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (2) - Oct. 26, 2007, 11:42:16 PM EDT

Can't be any more complicated than this problem :-) -NT - (bepatient) - Oct. 27, 2007, 12:24:02 AM EDT

Hoblink is not bad at all for that. - (jake123) - Oct. 27, 2007, 12:28:22 PM EDT

Working now. - (Andrew Grygus) - (6) - Oct. 30, 2007, 10:04:12 AM EDT

Oh, so it was that easy? Then WTH took you so long? -NT - (CRConrad) - Oct. 30, 2007, 06:37:09 AM EDT

It's a good thing you get paid by the hour, isn't it? ;-) - (Another Scott) - (4) - Oct. 30, 2007, 07:24:35 AM EDT

on jobs like that you never bill all yer hours - (boxley) - (3) - Oct. 30, 2007, 07:40:07 AM EDT

Concur - (jbrabeck) - Oct. 30, 2007, 08:20:22 AM EDT

Depends - (crazy) - Oct. 30, 2007, 08:20:41 AM EDT

Yup, they'll get billed for some development time . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - Oct. 30, 2007, 10:12:35 AM EDT

Shock the monkey!
50 ms