IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New We who Care the Most
never mention that, because..

..because once we got started, and the bawling ... the humanity, the zeitgeist and all the Upanishads with dual overhead camshafts on a side-valev einstpritzmotoren all wonky and finding out that the Weebl about pie music is from a Bach invention and,

and well, it would all soon get just too - too too.

Me? I could care less that the careless are so uncaring.. to speak carefully - -
- well maybe not -'fully': care-someWhat-fully? that is to say: not half-assed -'fully' but something interpolated twixt that and [pi \ufffd(1-epsilon) d(caring) dt + k],
k being of course -- the Universal Knockwurst constant,
(presuming that the knockwurst temp flow is 0 ... adiabatic.)

I hope this clears it up for you Peter, especially the day after that (Glorious? I trust) Birthday - wouldn't want your care-otid artery to be all athrob or even athwart.


ie Here's your CARE Package :-)



New :-D
     The Caring Continuum - (pwhysall) - (24)
         arnt you being as little careless with that assertion? -NT - (boxley)
         In spoken American, the "n't" is silent. HTH! ;-) -NT - (Another Scott) - (1)
             Innovative! - (pwhysall)
         How about this interpretation - (Steven A S) - (18)
             Or - (Silverlock) - (17)
                 The real question about this issue is - (jake123) - (2)
                     Well, there is that. -NT - (Silverlock)
                     Not you. - (pwhysall)
                 Riiight. - (pwhysall) - (13)
                     We who Care the Most - (Ashton) - (1)
                         :-D -NT - (Another Scott)
                     Not to belabor the obvious - (Silverlock) - (10)
                         Riiight. - (pwhysall) - (9)
                             Who couldn't care less about your opinion on this matter? - (Lily) - (3)
                                 If you're not interested, don't post. - (pwhysall) - (2)
                                     Can post where and when I want - (Lily) - (1)
                                         No kidding! - (imqwerky)
                             If the correct meaning is understood, how is it wrong? - (Silverlock) - (4)
                                 Alas, you're only correct in the US - (warmachine) - (3)
                                     Only correct in the US? - (Andrew Grygus) - (1)
                                         Stupid American language (new thread) - (warmachine)
                                     Stop it? No. - (Silverlock)
         Sorry, I think your prescriptivist stance here is wrong. - (CRConrad)
         Ancient Mayans could care less. - (Another Scott)

A marvelous break-through in purest Digital-Think.
85 ms