Democrats Trusted More Than Republicans on 10 Key Issues - (lincoln) - (88) - May 28, 2007, 08:54:25 PM EDT
         sounds like the sheeple are truly stupid - (boxley) - (87) - May 28, 2007, 09:53:35 PM EDT
             Sure they are; they voted for Bush AGAIN in '04. - (CRConrad) - (86) - May 29, 2007, 03:06:28 AM EDT
                 read me in my posts suomi boy :-) -NT - (boxley) - (85) - May 29, 2007, 09:47:18 AM EDT
                     I did. You keep defending him. That *scares* me. -NT - (CRConrad) - (84) - May 29, 2007, 10:36:11 AM EDT
                         go back further, I explicitely stated who I would vote for - (boxley) - (83) - May 29, 2007, 11:00:48 AM EDT
                             What,you saying you *don't* defend him at every opportunity? - (CRConrad) - (82) - May 29, 2007, 03:38:22 PM EDT
                                 I dislike the " I's hates bush so It must be impeachable" - (boxley) - (81) - May 29, 2007, 03:44:10 PM EDT
                                     Good nutshell -NT - (bepatient) - May 29, 2007, 04:04:43 PM EDT
                                     Not speaking for anyone else, but I think GWB has committed - (Seamus) - (79) - May 29, 2007, 06:35:32 PM EDT
                                         of course the idiot is impeachable - (boxley) - (71) - May 29, 2007, 06:50:56 PM EDT
                                             Actually if you read the document - (Seamus) - (68) - May 29, 2007, 08:10:41 PM EDT
                                                 wrong on both counts - (boxley) - (57) - May 29, 2007, 08:21:34 PM EDT
                                                     No not wrong. - (Seamus) - (56) - May 29, 2007, 08:56:24 PM EDT
                                                         again, I said Jackson vs supreme court - (boxley) - (55) - May 30, 2007, 09:56:05 AM EDT
                                                             Yes you did but it is less relevant to this than you think - (Seamus) - (53) - May 30, 2007, 05:03:42 PM EDT
                                                                 I can name quite a few presidents who did more harm to this - (boxley) - (52) - May 30, 2007, 05:53:54 PM EDT
                                                                     Oh Well, Then - - - - (Ashton) - (2) - May 30, 2007, 06:09:38 PM EDT
                                                                         re-read my post - (boxley) - (1) - May 30, 2007, 06:43:18 PM EDT
                                                                             Everyone does Bill - (Seamus) - May 30, 2007, 06:56:30 PM EDT
                                                                     Where to begin - (Seamus) - (48) - May 30, 2007, 06:49:42 PM EDT
                                                                         nope, there is a laundry list of impeachable items - (boxley) - (47) - May 30, 2007, 07:12:24 PM EDT
                                                                             We have been over this - (Seamus) - (46) - May 30, 2007, 07:24:56 PM EDT
                                                                                 Im curious about your stance on signing statements - (boxley) - (45) - May 30, 2007, 07:33:34 PM EDT
                                                                                     In his signings statements he has basically said he isn't - (Seamus) - (44) - May 30, 2007, 07:55:18 PM EDT
                                                                                         I beleive you as I have read the same - (boxley) - (43) - May 30, 2007, 07:58:37 PM EDT
                                                                                             Impeachment isn't the first response but I added them - (Seamus) - (42) - May 30, 2007, 08:38:34 PM EDT
                                                                                                 the democrats are too concerned about getting the whole hog - (boxley) - May 30, 2007, 08:44:06 PM EDT
                                                                                                 Signing statements go back to Monroe - (bepatient) - (40) - May 30, 2007, 09:10:36 PM EDT
                                                                                                     Minor nit - (Simon_Jester) - (4) - May 30, 2007, 10:19:29 PM EDT
                                                                                                         John Dean had an interesting commentary on them. - (Another Scott) - (3) - May 30, 2007, 10:31:44 PM EDT
                                                                                                             GWB has taken this... - (bepatient) - May 31, 2007, 05:56:00 AM EDT
                                                                                                             Rats and constitutional law dont exactly go together -NT - (boxley) - (1) - May 31, 2007, 09:21:11 AM EDT
                                                                                                                 Shooting the messenger (Dean) doesn't help the argument... -NT - (Another Scott) - May 31, 2007, 09:28:27 AM EDT
                                                                                                     There is a line item veto. - (hnick) - (34) - May 31, 2007, 07:27:32 AM EDT
                                                                                                         2 things - (bepatient) - (33) - May 31, 2007, 08:09:43 AM EDT
                                                                                                             Heh! - (hnick) - (3) - May 31, 2007, 12:18:15 PM EDT
                                                                                                                 as a country we have survived worse -NT - (boxley) - (2) - May 31, 2007, 01:00:27 PM EDT
                                                                                                                     Think Hookes modulus - (hnick) - (1) - May 31, 2007, 06:32:11 PM EDT
                                                                                                                         +5 Originality - an apt scienterrific application of Hooke! - (Ashton) - May 31, 2007, 06:52:37 PM EDT
                                                                                                             Signing statements - (Seamus) - (27) - May 31, 2007, 05:26:23 PM EDT
                                                                                                                 another rat reference, why is he an authority on anything? -NT - (boxley) - (26) - May 31, 2007, 05:40:08 PM EDT
                                                                                                                     Why is he a rat? Because he felt a greater loyalty to the - (Seamus) - (25) - May 31, 2007, 05:53:18 PM EDT
                                                                                                                         yeah, right. He had a greater loyalty to his - (boxley) - (24) - May 31, 2007, 06:00:58 PM EDT
                                                                                                                             So there is nothing he has done since then to redeem himself - (Seamus) - (23) - May 31, 2007, 06:08:36 PM EDT
                                                                                                                                 what has he done? - (boxley) - (22) - May 31, 2007, 06:37:05 PM EDT
                                                                                                                                     So he shouldn't have told the truth? -NT - (Another Scott) - (14) - May 31, 2007, 06:51:55 PM EDT
                                                                                                                                         he should have been building a case to get all of them - (boxley) - (13) - May 31, 2007, 08:01:40 PM EDT
                                                                                                                                             Has anyone else in the US government ever done that? - (Another Scott) - (11) - May 31, 2007, 08:42:23 PM EDT
                                                                                                                                                 scooter did the right thing - (boxley) - (10) - May 31, 2007, 08:54:41 PM EDT
                                                                                                                                                     Scooter lied to FBI, obstructed justice, comitted perjury. - (Another Scott) - May 31, 2007, 09:35:44 PM EDT
                                                                                                                                                     "The courage of their convictions, even if they are wrong"? - (CRConrad) - (8) - June 1, 2007, 09:34:25 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                                         principled!=good in any case - (boxley) - (7) - June 1, 2007, 10:50:58 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                                             Because you, and people like you, get to vote over there. - (CRConrad) - (6) - June 2, 2007, 07:33:48 PM EDT
                                                                                                                                                                 Given that the Ohio elections were probably rigged . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (5) - June 2, 2007, 07:48:18 PM EDT
                                                                                                                                                                     Sorry, not good enough; shouldn't have been even close. - (CRConrad) - (4) - June 2, 2007, 08:27:54 PM EDT
                                                                                                                                                                         yer saying it was better in the old days? - (boxley) - (3) - June 3, 2007, 10:28:23 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                                                             WTF are you gibbering about? Yes, of course it was! In... - (CRConrad) - (2) - June 3, 2007, 11:21:10 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                                                                 clinton didnt trample the WHAT! - (boxley) - (1) - June 3, 2007, 01:29:28 PM EDT
                                                                                                                                                                                     OK, so read it as "Clinton didn't *shatter* it" in stead. - (CRConrad) - June 3, 2007, 04:45:37 PM EDT
                                                                                                                                             No you tell everything you know and take the consequences - (Seamus) - June 1, 2007, 06:22:56 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                     What I see in this analysis is - - (Ashton) - (2) - May 31, 2007, 07:04:02 PM EDT
                                                                                                                                         so a trained lawyer is no better than a street punk? - (boxley) - May 31, 2007, 08:00:03 PM EDT
                                                                                                                                         We were talking about RATS - (Ashton) - May 31, 2007, 09:45:21 PM EDT
                                                                                                                                     Liddy was/is psycho - (Seamus) - (3) - May 31, 2007, 07:09:02 PM EDT
                                                                                                                                         why dont you read a real constitutional scholar - (boxley) - (2) - May 31, 2007, 07:58:38 PM EDT
                                                                                                                                             Constitutional scholars - (Seamus) - (1) - June 1, 2007, 06:17:32 AM EDT
                                                                                                                                                 just for grins, what decade of life are you in? - (boxley) - June 1, 2007, 09:12:00 AM EDT
                                                                                                             duplicate -NT - (Seamus) - May 31, 2007, 05:27:10 PM EDT
                                                             The pre-impeachment hearings re Nixon - (Ashton) - May 30, 2007, 05:03:55 PM EDT
                                                 Just to be clear - (Seamus) - (9) - May 29, 2007, 09:00:27 PM EDT
                                                     the inteligence estimates need to be publicised - (boxley) - (8) - May 30, 2007, 10:00:13 AM EDT
                                                         There is a lot to the intelligence side than just the PDB - (Seamus) - (7) - May 30, 2007, 05:45:49 PM EDT
                                                             absolutely, you just pointed out the problem - (boxley) - (6) - May 30, 2007, 05:56:40 PM EDT
                                                                 Yes he can - (Seamus) - (5) - May 30, 2007, 06:58:29 PM EDT
                                                                     not without evidence you cant -NT - (boxley) - (4) - May 30, 2007, 07:14:44 PM EDT
                                                                         This is the crux of the matter - (Seamus) - (3) - May 30, 2007, 07:52:12 PM EDT
                                                                             I would expect future presidents to - (boxley) - (2) - May 30, 2007, 08:04:34 PM EDT
                                                                                 And vis a vis a Congress that is a rubber stamp for... - (inthane-chan) - (1) - May 30, 2007, 11:09:30 PM EDT
                                                                                     yup, strong beleiver in tight gridlock -NT - (boxley) - May 31, 2007, 09:29:05 AM EDT
                                             He is exactly who he was when he was elected -NT - (Seamus) - May 29, 2007, 08:16:15 PM EDT
                                             The "not for"s are bs. - (Silverlock) - May 29, 2007, 08:23:05 PM EDT
                                         He's impeachable...but he won't be impeached. - (Simon_Jester) - (3) - May 29, 2007, 06:52:23 PM EDT
                                             Sure! - (jb4) - (2) - May 30, 2007, 09:10:45 AM EDT
                                                 s /Al Gonzales/Jeb Bush/ :-/ -NT - (Another Scott) - (1) - May 30, 2007, 09:34:48 AM EDT
                                                     Jeb ain't **that** stupid! -NT - (jb4) - May 30, 2007, 09:35:35 AM EDT
                                         one other thing, there isnt 60 votes so by your definition - (boxley) - (2) - May 29, 2007, 07:44:10 PM EDT
                                             Not yet there isn't, but there's still time - (Seamus) - May 29, 2007, 08:14:41 PM EDT
                                             Technically speaking - (Simon_Jester) - May 30, 2007, 08:21:47 AM EDT