[link|http://www.washtimes.com/metro/20040426-011701-7078r.htm|http://www.washtimes...-011701-7078r.htm]
[link|http://www.fairus.org/site/PageServer?pagename=iic_immigrationissuecenters0173|http://www.fairus.or...nissuecenters0173]
[link|http://www.city-journal.org/html/14_1_the_illegal_alien.html|http://www.city-jour...llegal_alien.html]
Sanctuary laws and rules are a direct result of the immigration lobby. Its not a conservative lobby by any stretch of the imagination. That is the "liberal" culture that I am talking about.
Its not about expanding the prisons. We should not be jailing them here. And these articles directly contradict your assertion that its about lack of manpower. The manpower in place catches illegals all the time..and that manpower is forced to ignore immigration status.
Its not about border guards. Sure there aren't enough...but what these cities are doing are building walls in the opposite direction. It basically guarantees that once they're in, they're in.
I have no comments regarding corporal punishment and the school systems..as it is completely irrelevant to any points I have raised. Drug use in Kansas also has nothing to do with it.
The main point there is a problem with the "characterization" of anyone opposing amnesty for illegal immigrants as racist. that characterization has been used by some and linked to by others in these forums.
And obviously its not enough to catch an illegal dealing drugs, (he was in possession with enough to distribute) regardless of who he is dealing to...we can trust the immigrant more because those 5th graders are notoriously unreliable. *boggle*