It's not "non-physical", though, is it?

IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #279,749

by pwhysall

3/27/07 12:04:04 PM

It's not "non-physical", though, is it?

The whole point of ghosties and ghoulies is that we can see them - with our eyes, we can feel them - with our heat-sensitive skin, and we can have things thrown at us. We even take pictures of them!

That's some pretty darned physical phenomena right there, isn't it?

Peter
[link|http://www.no2id.net/|Don't Let The Terrorists Win]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Home]
Use P2P for legitimate purposes!
[link|http://kevan.org/brain.cgi?pwhysall|A better terminal emulator]
[image|http://i66.photobucket.com/albums/h262/pwhysall/Misc/saveus.png|0|Darwinia||]

Why do you believe in ghosts? - (pwhysall) - (86) - March 27, 2007, 01:49:58 AM EDT

Of course all those proofs or disproofs would fail. - (Andrew Grygus) - (2) - March 27, 2007, 06:28:18 AM EDT

Sort of like proving Photography to a Blind person! -NT - (folkert) - March 27, 2007, 10:22:59 AM EDT

It's not "non-physical", though, is it? - (pwhysall) - March 27, 2007, 12:04:04 PM EDT

I grew up in a haunted house. - (imric) - (28) - March 27, 2007, 06:53:16 AM EDT

Naturally, the answer is "ghosts". - (pwhysall) - (27) - March 27, 2007, 11:59:20 AM EDT

ROFL - (imric) - (24) - March 27, 2007, 01:34:23 PM EDT

Re: ROFL - (pwhysall) - (15) - March 27, 2007, 01:44:06 PM EDT

*shrug* whatever. - (imric) - (2) - March 27, 2007, 03:16:36 PM EDT

You have no evidence. - (pwhysall) - (1) - March 27, 2007, 05:16:43 PM EDT

Uh huh. Whatever. Don't blow a fuse. -NT - (imric) - March 27, 2007, 05:38:20 PM EDT

Ah, your faith is touching . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (11) - March 27, 2007, 04:56:20 PM EDT

Will it? - (pwhysall) - (10) - March 27, 2007, 05:16:58 PM EDT

Oh, you'll know. - (Andrew Grygus) - (9) - March 28, 2007, 12:58:07 AM EDT

Faith is belief in the absence of evidence. - (pwhysall) - (8) - March 28, 2007, 09:07:35 AM EDT

you have as much faith as the rest of us by yer standard -NT - (boxley) - (1) - March 28, 2007, 09:47:12 AM EDT

That's quite right. - (pwhysall) - March 28, 2007, 10:08:42 AM EDT

Every logical argument . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (4) - March 28, 2007, 12:45:03 PM EDT

However. - (mmoffitt) - March 28, 2007, 01:10:15 PM EDT

<homer> - (pwhysall) - (1) - March 28, 2007, 01:17:15 PM EDT

And, you do :) -NT - (Andrew Grygus) - March 28, 2007, 02:12:04 PM EDT

Sure. - (Another Scott) - March 28, 2007, 01:42:08 PM EDT

You also have no evidence. - (jb4) - April 3, 2007, 03:33:00 PM EDT

sorry, thats anecdotal evidence :-) -NT - (boxley) - March 27, 2007, 01:46:04 PM EDT

Could have been infrasound, perhaps. - (Another Scott) - (6) - March 27, 2007, 06:42:10 PM EDT

It could have been - (imric) - (5) - March 27, 2007, 08:54:36 PM EDT

I'm not doubting what you saw. - (Another Scott) - (4) - March 27, 2007, 10:01:37 PM EDT

Oh, I applaud skepticism. - (imric) - (3) - March 27, 2007, 10:22:39 PM EDT

might have been electronic field fluctuations - (boxley) - (2) - March 28, 2007, 09:48:59 AM EDT

That's EXACTLY what I was thinking! -NT - (bionerd) - March 28, 2007, 10:53:29 AM EDT

Heheh. - (imric) - March 28, 2007, 02:33:14 PM EDT

Oh ye of little nonfaithlessness.. - (Ashton) - (1) - March 27, 2007, 05:23:06 PM EDT

You're right. There is no out there - (bionerd) - March 27, 2007, 05:35:11 PM EDT

No. - (warmachine) - (4) - March 27, 2007, 08:02:25 AM EDT

nit - (boxley) - (3) - March 27, 2007, 09:44:57 AM EDT

How so? -NT - (pwhysall) - (2) - March 27, 2007, 12:06:23 PM EDT

start with this link - (boxley) - (1) - March 27, 2007, 12:49:19 PM EDT

From advanced geometry to Star Trek. - (pwhysall) - March 27, 2007, 01:47:34 PM EDT

I don't know why some people do - (Seamus) - March 27, 2007, 08:46:47 AM EDT

Whadda ya mean science doesnt support "Ghosts"? - (bionerd) - (10) - March 27, 2007, 03:51:44 PM EDT

Become one with the universe - (JayMehaffey) - (4) - March 27, 2007, 04:28:05 PM EDT

care to prove that? - (boxley) - March 27, 2007, 05:22:42 PM EDT

Re: Become one with the universe - (bionerd) - (2) - March 27, 2007, 05:23:12 PM EDT

Not bad, Grasshopper - (Ashton) - (1) - March 27, 2007, 05:41:27 PM EDT

Thanks. I'm getting there. -NT - (bionerd) - March 27, 2007, 05:45:11 PM EDT

You're falling prey to the woo-woos. - (pwhysall) - (1) - March 27, 2007, 05:21:44 PM EDT

I dont have to prove anything - (bionerd) - March 27, 2007, 05:29:02 PM EDT

The energy dissipates as heat - (warmachine) - (2) - March 27, 2007, 05:29:45 PM EDT

what absolute rubbish - (boxley) - (1) - March 27, 2007, 07:33:23 PM EDT

The Mac is NOT a PC... - (pwhysall) - March 27, 2007, 11:03:50 PM EDT

pope chimes in - (boxley) - (5) - March 27, 2007, 07:26:20 PM EDT

He needs to get out more. - (Another Scott) - March 27, 2007, 07:39:19 PM EDT

And how many former popes are burning brightly there? -NT - (Andrew Grygus) - March 27, 2007, 07:39:37 PM EDT

Like he knows anything -NT - (tuberculosis) - (2) - March 27, 2007, 08:06:47 PM EDT

he is a licensed exorcist - (boxley) - (1) - March 27, 2007, 09:13:54 PM EDT

Those need psychiatry, not hocus pocus -NT - (tuberculosis) - March 28, 2007, 12:32:53 AM EDT

Define ghost - (orion) - (25) - April 2, 2007, 09:58:07 PM EDT

Go and investigate what entropy is... - (pwhysall) - (24) - April 3, 2007, 02:31:27 AM EDT

Entropy means - (orion) - (23) - April 3, 2007, 03:25:20 PM EDT

The part you seem to have missed - (JayMehaffey) - (22) - April 3, 2007, 03:47:27 PM EDT

Then quantum mechanics breaks down reversibility? - (orion) - (2) - April 3, 2007, 04:21:06 PM EDT

Re: Then quantum mechanics breaks down reversibility? - (JayMehaffey) - (1) - April 3, 2007, 09:51:48 PM EDT

Re: Then quantum mechanics breaks down reversibility? - (orion) - April 3, 2007, 10:05:58 PM EDT

Maybe not. - (Another Scott) - (18) - April 3, 2007, 04:27:15 PM EDT

Re: Maybe not. - (orion) - (17) - April 3, 2007, 05:19:04 PM EDT

This requires reversing time - (warmachine) - (16) - April 3, 2007, 08:07:22 PM EDT

wrong idea - (boxley) - (10) - April 3, 2007, 08:10:21 PM EDT

It just doesn't make sense to me. - (Another Scott) - (8) - April 3, 2007, 08:32:35 PM EDT

Individual souls . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - April 3, 2007, 08:57:56 PM EDT

but I do believe I existed before birth - (boxley) - (5) - April 3, 2007, 09:09:52 PM EDT

I agree - (Lily) - (4) - April 3, 2007, 11:21:08 PM EDT

I wish it were so - (orion) - (3) - April 3, 2007, 11:56:42 PM EDT

It absolutely is so - (Lily) - (2) - April 4, 2007, 06:49:48 AM EDT

Re: It absolutely is so - (orion) - (1) - April 4, 2007, 07:32:11 AM EDT

You can. - (pwhysall) - April 4, 2007, 07:58:31 AM EDT

What it could be - (orion) - April 3, 2007, 09:55:35 PM EDT

Interesting idea - (orion) - April 3, 2007, 09:34:50 PM EDT

From what I heard - (orion) - (4) - April 3, 2007, 09:41:14 PM EDT

Why are there no ghosts at traffic accident blackspots? -NT - (pwhysall) - (3) - April 4, 2007, 12:41:15 AM EDT

Re: Why are there no ghosts at traffic accident blackspots? - (orion) - (2) - April 4, 2007, 07:33:51 AM EDT

What "neural net"? "Recycled" how? -NT - (pwhysall) - April 4, 2007, 07:57:54 AM EDT

Neural net in air? - (warmachine) - April 4, 2007, 08:24:41 AM EDT

what does Peter and Malaysian Muslims have in common? - (boxley) - (4) - April 15, 2007, 12:41:19 PM EDT

I suppose that means the're not all bad! :) - (a6l6e6x) - (1) - April 15, 2007, 02:16:39 PM EDT

Every Humanist I've heard of agrees - (JayMehaffey) - April 15, 2007, 05:29:26 PM EDT

Still banging the "science is a religion" drum, eh? - (pwhysall) - (1) - April 16, 2007, 07:37:39 AM EDT

Im not claiming that, heh, its an measured observation -NT - (boxley) - April 16, 2007, 08:43:05 AM EDT

iwethey.org