Why do you believe in ghosts? - (pwhysall) - (86) - March 27, 2007, 01:49:58 AM EDT
         Of course all those proofs or disproofs would fail. - (Andrew Grygus) - (2) - March 27, 2007, 06:28:18 AM EDT
             Sort of like proving Photography to a Blind person! -NT - (folkert) - March 27, 2007, 10:22:59 AM EDT
             It's not "non-physical", though, is it? - (pwhysall) - March 27, 2007, 12:04:04 PM EDT
         I grew up in a haunted house. - (imric) - (28) - March 27, 2007, 06:53:16 AM EDT
             Naturally, the answer is "ghosts". - (pwhysall) - (27) - March 27, 2007, 11:59:20 AM EDT
                 ROFL - (imric) - (24) - March 27, 2007, 01:34:23 PM EDT
                     Re: ROFL - (pwhysall) - (15) - March 27, 2007, 01:44:06 PM EDT
                         *shrug* whatever. - (imric) - (2) - March 27, 2007, 03:16:36 PM EDT
                             You have no evidence. - (pwhysall) - (1) - March 27, 2007, 05:16:43 PM EDT
                                 Uh huh. Whatever. Don't blow a fuse. -NT - (imric) - March 27, 2007, 05:38:20 PM EDT
                         Ah, your faith is touching . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (11) - March 27, 2007, 04:56:20 PM EDT
                             Will it? - (pwhysall) - (10) - March 27, 2007, 05:16:58 PM EDT
                                 Oh, you'll know. - (Andrew Grygus) - (9) - March 28, 2007, 12:58:07 AM EDT
                                     Faith is belief in the absence of evidence. - (pwhysall) - (8) - March 28, 2007, 09:07:35 AM EDT
                                         you have as much faith as the rest of us by yer standard -NT - (boxley) - (1) - March 28, 2007, 09:47:12 AM EDT
                                             That's quite right. - (pwhysall) - March 28, 2007, 10:08:42 AM EDT
                                         Every logical argument . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (4) - March 28, 2007, 12:45:03 PM EDT
                                             However. - (mmoffitt) - March 28, 2007, 01:10:15 PM EDT
                                             <homer> - (pwhysall) - (1) - March 28, 2007, 01:17:15 PM EDT
                                                 And, you do :) -NT - (Andrew Grygus) - March 28, 2007, 02:12:04 PM EDT
                                             Sure. - (Another Scott) - March 28, 2007, 01:42:08 PM EDT
                                         You also have no evidence. - (jb4) - April 3, 2007, 03:33:00 PM EDT
                     sorry, thats anecdotal evidence :-) -NT - (boxley) - March 27, 2007, 01:46:04 PM EDT
                     Could have been infrasound, perhaps. - (Another Scott) - (6) - March 27, 2007, 06:42:10 PM EDT
                         It could have been - (imric) - (5) - March 27, 2007, 08:54:36 PM EDT
                             I'm not doubting what you saw. - (Another Scott) - (4) - March 27, 2007, 10:01:37 PM EDT
                                 Oh, I applaud skepticism. - (imric) - (3) - March 27, 2007, 10:22:39 PM EDT
                                     might have been electronic field fluctuations - (boxley) - (2) - March 28, 2007, 09:48:59 AM EDT
                                         That's EXACTLY what I was thinking! -NT - (bionerd) - March 28, 2007, 10:53:29 AM EDT
                                         Heheh. - (imric) - March 28, 2007, 02:33:14 PM EDT
                 Oh ye of little nonfaithlessness.. - (Ashton) - (1) - March 27, 2007, 05:23:06 PM EDT
                     You're right. There is no out there - (bionerd) - March 27, 2007, 05:35:11 PM EDT
         No. - (warmachine) - (4) - March 27, 2007, 08:02:25 AM EDT
             nit - (boxley) - (3) - March 27, 2007, 09:44:57 AM EDT
                 How so? -NT - (pwhysall) - (2) - March 27, 2007, 12:06:23 PM EDT
                     start with this link - (boxley) - (1) - March 27, 2007, 12:49:19 PM EDT
                         From advanced geometry to Star Trek. - (pwhysall) - March 27, 2007, 01:47:34 PM EDT
         I don't know why some people do - (Seamus) - March 27, 2007, 08:46:47 AM EDT
         Whadda ya mean science doesnt support "Ghosts"? - (bionerd) - (10) - March 27, 2007, 03:51:44 PM EDT
             Become one with the universe - (JayMehaffey) - (4) - March 27, 2007, 04:28:05 PM EDT
                 care to prove that? - (boxley) - March 27, 2007, 05:22:42 PM EDT
                 Re: Become one with the universe - (bionerd) - (2) - March 27, 2007, 05:23:12 PM EDT
                     Not bad, Grasshopper - (Ashton) - (1) - March 27, 2007, 05:41:27 PM EDT
                         Thanks. I'm getting there. -NT - (bionerd) - March 27, 2007, 05:45:11 PM EDT
             You're falling prey to the woo-woos. - (pwhysall) - (1) - March 27, 2007, 05:21:44 PM EDT
                 I dont have to prove anything - (bionerd) - March 27, 2007, 05:29:02 PM EDT
             The energy dissipates as heat - (warmachine) - (2) - March 27, 2007, 05:29:45 PM EDT
                 what absolute rubbish - (boxley) - (1) - March 27, 2007, 07:33:23 PM EDT
                     The Mac is NOT a PC... - (pwhysall) - March 27, 2007, 11:03:50 PM EDT
         pope chimes in - (boxley) - (5) - March 27, 2007, 07:26:20 PM EDT
             He needs to get out more. - (Another Scott) - March 27, 2007, 07:39:19 PM EDT
             And how many former popes are burning brightly there? -NT - (Andrew Grygus) - March 27, 2007, 07:39:37 PM EDT
             Like he knows anything -NT - (tuberculosis) - (2) - March 27, 2007, 08:06:47 PM EDT
                 he is a licensed exorcist - (boxley) - (1) - March 27, 2007, 09:13:54 PM EDT
                     Those need psychiatry, not hocus pocus -NT - (tuberculosis) - March 28, 2007, 12:32:53 AM EDT
         Define ghost - (orion) - (25) - April 2, 2007, 09:58:07 PM EDT
             Go and investigate what entropy is... - (pwhysall) - (24) - April 3, 2007, 02:31:27 AM EDT
                 Entropy means - (orion) - (23) - April 3, 2007, 03:25:20 PM EDT
                     The part you seem to have missed - (JayMehaffey) - (22) - April 3, 2007, 03:47:27 PM EDT
                         Then quantum mechanics breaks down reversibility? - (orion) - (2) - April 3, 2007, 04:21:06 PM EDT
                             Re: Then quantum mechanics breaks down reversibility? - (JayMehaffey) - (1) - April 3, 2007, 09:51:48 PM EDT
                                 Re: Then quantum mechanics breaks down reversibility? - (orion) - April 3, 2007, 10:05:58 PM EDT
                         Maybe not. - (Another Scott) - (18) - April 3, 2007, 04:27:15 PM EDT
                             Re: Maybe not. - (orion) - (17) - April 3, 2007, 05:19:04 PM EDT
                                 This requires reversing time - (warmachine) - (16) - April 3, 2007, 08:07:22 PM EDT
                                     wrong idea - (boxley) - (10) - April 3, 2007, 08:10:21 PM EDT
                                         It just doesn't make sense to me. - (Another Scott) - (8) - April 3, 2007, 08:32:35 PM EDT
                                             Individual souls . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - April 3, 2007, 08:57:56 PM EDT
                                             but I do believe I existed before birth - (boxley) - (5) - April 3, 2007, 09:09:52 PM EDT
                                                 I agree - (Lily) - (4) - April 3, 2007, 11:21:08 PM EDT
                                                     I wish it were so - (orion) - (3) - April 3, 2007, 11:56:42 PM EDT
                                                         It absolutely is so - (Lily) - (2) - April 4, 2007, 06:49:48 AM EDT
                                                             Re: It absolutely is so - (orion) - (1) - April 4, 2007, 07:32:11 AM EDT
                                                                 You can. - (pwhysall) - April 4, 2007, 07:58:31 AM EDT
                                             What it could be - (orion) - April 3, 2007, 09:55:35 PM EDT
                                         Interesting idea - (orion) - April 3, 2007, 09:34:50 PM EDT
                                     From what I heard - (orion) - (4) - April 3, 2007, 09:41:14 PM EDT
                                         Why are there no ghosts at traffic accident blackspots? -NT - (pwhysall) - (3) - April 4, 2007, 12:41:15 AM EDT
                                             Re: Why are there no ghosts at traffic accident blackspots? - (orion) - (2) - April 4, 2007, 07:33:51 AM EDT
                                                 What "neural net"? "Recycled" how? -NT - (pwhysall) - April 4, 2007, 07:57:54 AM EDT
                                                 Neural net in air? - (warmachine) - April 4, 2007, 08:24:41 AM EDT
         what does Peter and Malaysian Muslims have in common? - (boxley) - (4) - April 15, 2007, 12:41:19 PM EDT
             I suppose that means the're not all bad! :) - (a6l6e6x) - (1) - April 15, 2007, 02:16:39 PM EDT
                 Every Humanist I've heard of agrees - (JayMehaffey) - April 15, 2007, 05:29:26 PM EDT
             Still banging the "science is a religion" drum, eh? - (pwhysall) - (1) - April 16, 2007, 07:37:39 AM EDT
                 Im not claiming that, heh, its an measured observation -NT - (boxley) - April 16, 2007, 08:43:05 AM EDT