IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 1 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New point=missed
traditionally it was oil brokers and companies that drove the oil commodity markets with mild swings when it got tight and loose. Now every 2 bit money manager who doesnt have the vaguest clue about supply and demand is plunging in oil. Our last price respite came when a largish firm that diddled with pension funds lost 100's of millions in the oil market and the other gamblers got scared. If pension funds lose a ton that is taxpayers picking up the tab.

The main point is instead of taxing the oil companies 10% lets tax commodity profits in essential sectors, oil water and electricity natural gas coal at %50. In the case of oil the government would capture the same profit margins as the oil companies at the current rates while the oil companies tax bill would remain the same as today. What I was AAAARRRGGING about is that people think it is exxon bp shell etc that is the cause of these high prices when actually its every steamboat highroller with a top hat who has discovered tulips. Get those fuckers out of the market and we would have 1.85 gas at the pumps.
thanx,
bill
Any opinions expressed by me are mine alone, posted from my home computer, on my own time as a free american and do not reflect the opinions of any person or company that I have had professional relations with in the past 51 years. meep

reach me at [link|mailto:bill.oxley@cox.net|mailto:bill.oxley@cox.net]
New I could go along with some of that.
But restricting who can play in the market would be difficult to do in such a way that doesn't make it easier for big players to manipulate it.

Pension funds, insurance companies, etc., should be investing in less risky things than the commodity markets. I have no problem with regulating things like that.

Personally, I think that cheap gasoline has been a disaster for the US. The price is almost certainly going to go up substantially over the next 20 years and a lot of people are going to be hurt. (Hi Beep! ;-) If, 30 years ago, gas taxes had been slowly raised so that they were [link|http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000085&sid=aQ_oXusAQaWU&refer=europe|75% of the pump price] rather than dimes on the gallon, we probably wouldn't be importing so much of the stuff to feed 10 mpg, 6000 pound commuting vechicles. Our foreign policy wouldn't be tied as strongly to the Saudis and other undemocratic regimes, either.

Cheers,
Scott.
(Who thinks that [link|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Bayard_Anderson|John Anderson] was ahead of his time, but still about 10 years too late. He advocated a $0.50/gal gasoline tax in 1980, IIRC.)
New You'll not hear a peep from me on this.
I've paid $4/gallon and driven sub 2 litre cars and agree with the Nat Security implications.
Too much of today's music is fashionable crap dressed as artistry.Adrian Belew
     Oh sure, it sounds great - (bepatient) - (33)
         I'm sure she just mis-spoke. - (Another Scott) - (30)
             Then you haven't paid attention - (bepatient) - (29)
                 Evidence, please. - (Another Scott) - (1)
                     Off the top of my head - (bepatient)
                 I'm sure she mispoke - (JayMehaffey) - (5)
                     Comfort yourself that way if you like. -NT - (bepatient) - (4)
                         Odd view of reality - (JayMehaffey) - (3)
                             she believes its all hers, thats a core belief -NT - (boxley) - (2)
                                 Yeah, those evil left-wingers! - (CRConrad) - (1)
                                     :-) -NT - (Another Scott)
                 I don't think it was a mistake either - (andread) - (20)
                     Sen Clinton is going to be the only reason a Repo is elected -NT - (boxley) - (3)
                         Yep -NT - (bepatient)
                         Or Obama. - (mmoffitt) - (1)
                             Well it's the only way the Party has figured out . . . - (Andrew Grygus)
                     Really? - (bepatient) - (15)
                         2006 National Press Club speech. - (Another Scott)
                         No and you know it - (andread) - (13)
                             but those taxes apply to the customers - (Simon_Jester) - (7)
                                 Just keep in mind . . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (6)
                                     Well, there's always sugar cane. - (Another Scott) - (1)
                                         Lula OpEd at the Washington Post. - (Another Scott)
                                     Not only that - (jake123) - (3)
                                         Nit: not farm belt -- *corn* belt - (drewk) - (2)
                                             not corn belt, conagra daniels belt -NT - (boxley)
                                             Hey, I thought it was - (bepatient)
                             AAAAARRRRGGGGGHHH!!!!!!! - (boxley) - (4)
                                 No, that's not a good idea. - (Another Scott) - (3)
                                     point=missed - (boxley) - (2)
                                         I could go along with some of that. - (Another Scott) - (1)
                                             You'll not hear a peep from me on this. - (bepatient)
         Yeah, but... - (Simon_Jester)
         Taxing tobacco to pay for health care/anti-smoking campaigns - (tuberculosis)

There are some who call me... LRPD.
79 ms