IWETHEY v. 0.3.0
|
TODO
1,095 registered users | 0
active users
| 0 LpH |
Statistics
Login
|
Create New User
Welcome to IWETHEY!
IWETHEY Home
/
IWETHEY Board
/
Politics Forum
/
No, You Are!
Post #278,684
by
Another Scott
3/18/07 11:29:53 AM
3/18/07 11:41:11 AM
Reply
No, You Are!
[link|http://snltranscripts.jt.org/00/00bbostonteens.phtml|ObSLN reference]
Mutual Admiration Societies are pretty boring.
Thanks for stirring things up a little, though I still don't understand you too well on these topics...
:-)
Cheers,
Scott.
Edited by
Another Scott
March 18, 2007, 11:41:11 AM EDT
Hey, I didn't say nuthin'. :-)
Collapse All History
"They did it too" only works if, ya know, they did it too
- (
Silverlock
)
- (77)
- March 15, 2007, 09:04:15 AM EDT
Please point me to something...
- (
bepatient
)
- (71)
- March 15, 2007, 09:51:11 AM EDT
Re: Please point me to something...
- (
Seamus
)
- (2)
- March 15, 2007, 02:11:48 PM EDT
So now ppl in Washington can't read
- (
bepatient
)
- (1)
- March 15, 2007, 02:15:37 PM EDT
Re: So now ppl in Washington can't read
- (
Seamus
)
- March 15, 2007, 03:36:06 PM EDT
I already said that he has the legal authority.
- (
Silverlock
)
- (4)
- March 15, 2007, 03:38:10 PM EDT
Who lied about it? Prez? Gonzo?
- (
bepatient
)
- (3)
- March 15, 2007, 03:52:29 PM EDT
You should learn more about what you are defending.
-NT
- (
Silverlock
)
- (2)
- March 15, 2007, 04:03:06 PM EDT
You should learn to clarify use of pronouns
-NT
- (
bepatient
)
- (1)
- March 15, 2007, 04:28:32 PM EDT
And I was incorrect.
- (
bepatient
)
- March 15, 2007, 04:33:07 PM EDT
I'm lost....
- (
Simon_Jester
)
- (61)
- March 15, 2007, 09:57:15 PM EDT
nit
- (
boxley
)
- (58)
- March 15, 2007, 09:59:42 PM EDT
Nope...
- (
Simon_Jester
)
- (57)
- March 15, 2007, 10:18:21 PM EDT
Point missed
- (
bepatient
)
- (56)
- March 15, 2007, 10:28:49 PM EDT
I don't think so.
- (
Simon_Jester
)
- (55)
- March 15, 2007, 10:42:02 PM EDT
bingo
- (
boxley
)
- March 16, 2007, 08:55:38 AM EDT
Hillary did it and had no authority
- (
bepatient
)
- (53)
- March 16, 2007, 10:32:15 AM EDT
Then who let her?
- (
drewk
)
- (22)
- March 16, 2007, 11:14:31 AM EDT
Thats why they call it TravelGate.
- (
bepatient
)
- (19)
- March 16, 2007, 11:32:06 AM EDT
And Rove gave the order, and it was followed.
- (
jb4
)
- (18)
- March 17, 2007, 09:10:44 PM EDT
No, he didn't. And there's sworn testimony that >she< did.
-NT
- (
bepatient
)
- (17)
- March 17, 2007, 09:44:17 PM EDT
Which, of course, they're frantically backpeddaling on.
- (
jb4
)
- (2)
- March 17, 2007, 09:48:46 PM EDT
Who is backpedaling on what.
- (
bepatient
)
- March 17, 2007, 09:51:19 PM EDT
You're forgetting the other part of the analogy ....
- (
Simon_Jester
)
- March 18, 2007, 01:05:03 PM EDT
Sworn testimony from this crowd
- (
Silverlock
)
- (13)
- March 17, 2007, 09:53:35 PM EDT
Look it up yourself if you must
- (
bepatient
)
- (12)
- March 17, 2007, 10:24:53 PM EDT
Missed point
- (
Silverlock
)
- (11)
- March 18, 2007, 07:48:21 AM EDT
Make me laugh
- (
bepatient
)
- (10)
- March 18, 2007, 11:18:10 AM EDT
Then why do you get upset when they get called on it?
-NT
- (
Another Scott
)
- (9)
- March 18, 2007, 11:23:16 AM EDT
Huh?
- (
bepatient
)
- (8)
- March 18, 2007, 11:27:45 AM EDT
real governing
- (
Seamus
)
- (7)
- March 18, 2007, 11:38:31 AM EDT
Pessimist, remember?
- (
bepatient
)
- (2)
- March 18, 2007, 11:41:47 AM EDT
What kind of pessimist?
- (
Seamus
)
- (1)
- March 18, 2007, 01:07:52 PM EDT
Like what?
- (
bepatient
)
- March 18, 2007, 01:11:57 PM EDT
Wouldn't be surprised if that provision was added in conf.
- (
Another Scott
)
- (3)
- March 21, 2007, 12:23:42 AM EDT
Wow, you're a genius!
- (
drewk
)
- (2)
- March 21, 2007, 12:40:12 AM EDT
You can call me "Mr. Obvious" if you'd like.
-NT
- (
Another Scott
)
- (1)
- March 21, 2007, 12:43:56 AM EDT
ICLRPD (new thread)
- (
Silverlock
)
- March 21, 2007, 06:12:38 AM EDT
pro/con link
- (
boxley
)
- (1)
- March 16, 2007, 11:56:35 AM EDT
If that page is basically accurate ...
- (
drewk
)
- March 16, 2007, 12:38:16 PM EDT
Re: Hillary did it and had no authority
- (
Seamus
)
- (29)
- March 16, 2007, 01:49:58 PM EDT
What emails are you talking about?
- (
bepatient
)
- (28)
- March 16, 2007, 02:05:15 PM EDT
Copy of email
- (
bepatient
)
- (26)
- March 16, 2007, 02:18:11 PM EDT
Plausible deniability
- (
drewk
)
- (6)
- March 16, 2007, 02:27:40 PM EDT
Yup.
- (
Another Scott
)
- (5)
- March 16, 2007, 03:36:52 PM EDT
This is exactly what starts it
- (
bepatient
)
- (4)
- March 16, 2007, 04:05:35 PM EDT
Isn't it *also* possible
- (
drewk
)
- (2)
- March 16, 2007, 04:22:21 PM EDT
On this matter
- (
bepatient
)
- (1)
- March 16, 2007, 04:33:37 PM EDT
Shut your mouth
- (
drewk
)
- March 16, 2007, 04:57:03 PM EDT
Miers did not start it
- (
Seamus
)
- March 16, 2007, 05:46:51 PM EDT
E-Mails show Rove's Role in Attorny Firings
- (
lincoln
)
- (3)
- March 16, 2007, 03:09:16 PM EDT
They don't show that at all. Thats why I attached the email.
-NT
- (
bepatient
)
- (2)
- March 16, 2007, 03:25:51 PM EDT
You must have better sources than ABC News, right?
- (
lincoln
)
- (1)
- March 17, 2007, 01:04:45 PM EDT
I guess I do.
- (
bepatient
)
- March 17, 2007, 01:55:33 PM EDT
Rove was the person people were looking to ok this
- (
Seamus
)
- (14)
- March 16, 2007, 03:29:58 PM EDT
BS
- (
bepatient
)
- (13)
- March 16, 2007, 03:32:33 PM EDT
It is not BS
- (
Seamus
)
- (12)
- March 16, 2007, 05:36:11 PM EDT
Guesswork, guesswork and more guesswork
- (
bepatient
)
- (11)
- March 16, 2007, 06:17:33 PM EDT
If I was a reporter
- (
Seamus
)
- (10)
- March 16, 2007, 06:53:59 PM EDT
Define "involved"
- (
bepatient
)
- (9)
- March 16, 2007, 08:14:31 PM EDT
like this
- (
Seamus
)
- (6)
- March 17, 2007, 10:00:10 AM EDT
then no.
- (
bepatient
)
- (5)
- March 17, 2007, 11:02:45 AM EDT
We may know more next week.
- (
Another Scott
)
- March 17, 2007, 11:21:54 AM EDT
Can you point me to the scathing email
- (
Seamus
)
- (3)
- March 17, 2007, 06:39:52 PM EDT
So now you agree with me?
- (
bepatient
)
- (2)
- March 17, 2007, 09:46:39 PM EDT
No I don't
- (
Seamus
)
- March 18, 2007, 06:38:19 AM EDT
If not Rove, who *did* push it?
-NT
- (
drewk
)
- March 18, 2007, 09:23:03 AM EDT
is /iz/ - verb
- (
jb4
)
- (1)
- March 17, 2007, 09:20:49 PM EDT
It'd be funny if it wasn't sad.
-NT
- (
bepatient
)
- March 17, 2007, 09:47:47 PM EDT
They are already backtracking on Harriet
- (
JayMehaffey
)
- March 16, 2007, 02:33:35 PM EDT
Tradition
- (
JayMehaffey
)
- (1)
- March 15, 2007, 10:31:13 PM EDT
I think this is the section of the renewed Patriot Act.
- (
Another Scott
)
- March 15, 2007, 11:07:13 PM EDT
Welcome to the fight, comrade.
-NT
- (
mmoffitt
)
- March 16, 2007, 01:08:18 PM EDT
Dan Froomkin says don't be distracted, keep an eye on Rove.
- (
Another Scott
)
- (4)
- March 17, 2007, 11:23:28 PM EDT
Thats right. Hear the bells?
- (
bepatient
)
- (3)
- March 18, 2007, 11:19:37 AM EDT
We'll see.
-NT
- (
Another Scott
)
- (2)
- March 18, 2007, 11:22:37 AM EDT
hell of a guy! :-)
-NT
- (
bepatient
)
- (1)
- March 18, 2007, 11:33:08 AM EDT
No, You Are!
- (
Another Scott
)
- March 18, 2007, 11:41:11 AM EDT
i
we
they
.org
Phrasers on
STUN
er SHUN!
140 ms