[link|http://www.nytimes.com/2005/04/03/national/03boston.html|NY Times]. He certainly was a major force in the fall of Communism in Eastern Europe and that is a proud legacy. His efforts to improve relations with Judaism were also very important. But his lack of action against Cardinal Law (and his effective promotion of him to an important position in Rome,) and his lack of oversight in the abuse of children by priests was a big black mark against him.
It will be interesting to see who replaces him. We have to assume that it will be another conservative person, but will the European bias make its last stand, or will a Brazilian or Nigerian make it? My guess is that [link|http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A22639-2005Apr3.html|Tettamanzi] has the inside track - but it's just a guess based on no evidence. I would expect that an African or Central or South American will be next in line.
Cheers,
Scott.